jEzTeR wrote:Thats a crazy low price!Is that with the 6-speed and Brembos?I priced the G35c with 6-speed ,Brembos,Nav,Areo package w/ 4 piece spoiler,power sunroof, premimum package,and a few othere options at..Total Configured MSRP† $38,645.00
If you compare it to a BMW 330Ci Sport, it's cheap.
All 6MT G35s come with 18ins and Brembo brakes. Drop the Nav and it'll be a little more affordable. hatebobbarker has a G35 himself (it's for sale if anybody's intrested) and it was everything but nav. 38k out the door
creophus wrote:..few of them offer turbo charged vehicles that offered them in the past. Nissan, Mazda, and Toyota used to have turbo charged vehicles, none of them do now. I do recognize the EVO, WRX & SRT4 are new (at least to us) cars that are turbo charged, but turbo charged cars cost the company a lot of money. The parts have to be forged and because they generate a lot of heat, there are more problems with warranty issues, and its tough to meet CARB regulations with these cars.
Turbocharged cars have the most difficulty with cold start. That's why the WRX has a cat right before the turbo, which chokes the car. A simple eighteen inch pipe makes the stock WRX immensely more driveable.Also, we get the "truck motors" because they're already good to go in this country. I think you'll agree with me when I theorize that the Nissan/Infiniti GT-R that we'll recieve will have a form of the V8 found in the FX45. With the way Nissan tunes their exhaust music, it wouldn't be too bad of an idea.
creophus wrote:AREITU brought up the fact that the R34 would have cost like $40,000 if it came over, but I believe it would have been more like $50,000+ because of the emissions laws. The turbo supras were extremely expensive when you could buy them new. Even an S14 would have ran you $24,000 in 1996!
Used Supra prices were grossly inflated after Fast and Furious. I saw a showroom new Supra with only six miles on the odometer selling for $65,000. Nobody bought Supras when they were still new because it was too expensive for a Toyota. Might as well buy a Lexus. I'm suprised they didn't sell those things to us with a 1UZ-FE in it. By the same logic, the Skyline would have sold in ridiculously small numbers because of "only" 280hp. Car mags don't test cars with mods.For example, removing GM's skip-shift is a $30 deal. They ***** about Skip-shift because they only test stock cars.And if you think about it, even before the RWD craze, Honda was having a very hard time selling the 5th gen Preludes, which aside from the FWD part, is in the same price and performance category and it was aimed roughtly at the same demographic as the 240SX. If the S15 came out, it would not only have a KA, it would have cost around $24,000.
creophus wrote:If anything the cars are getting cheaper compared to the performance that you can get now. I believe that the sports car is coming back. No company wants to loose money on a vehicle :rolleyes so they're cautious about introducing new models. But soon I believe Toyota will have to have an answer for the 350Z, just like Mitsubishi had to have an answer for the WRX...
I totally agree! The sports car era is coming back due to generated intrest in the sports compact world. In fact, Toyota may be considering an "affordable" low-power RWD car in the spirit of the AE86 Corolla, because they recognize the demand for it. The "Big Three" concentrate more on their truck sales than anything. At the LA Auto Show, their new compacts were either badge-engineered, or it wasn't based on an American designed chassis (So they can spend R&D $$$ on trucks). The new Cobalt is more European than American. As a quick and unofficial answer to the 350Z, Pontiac is giving us the GTO (Holden Monaro). It's so badge engineered, it dosen't even really resemble any other wedgy-looking Pontiac.