How is abortion unconstitutional under the 14th A? You mean protected under the 9th and 14th?s13sr20chris wrote: abortion(which is unconstitutional according to the 14th ammendment, but dont tell the supreme court to stop legislating), etc.
I'll give you an example where you are wrong in an area. When talking about how people in the project areas are surrounded by drugs and crime and are unable to escape their situation, you are neglecting the possibility of them still being able to decide on their own that they don't want to follow that path. My friend Buddy, is a prime example. He lived in a Welfare home. His mom had 5 kids altogether. Each one to different fathers. She might have been married once. MAYBE. She did drugs, she drank, she was off with her boyfriends while he came home from school and took care of his siblings. It took him another semester to graduate High School, but he did it. True he hasn't gone to college, but he's been working full time. He's got a girlfriend he's stuck with for the past 7 years(since senior year for crying out loud), and he's doing well for himself. Meanwhile his siblings are all in seperate homes now as they were taken away from the mother when buddy moved out and are adjusting to the changes before them. People can improve their lives if they want to. But they have to want to.fluidmotion wrote:The main reason why bush won the presidency, according to the polls, is because of moral values. The only reason why people think bush has more moral values than kerry is that people who are conservative generally are considered to have more moral values. But is this true? Is a liberal person less moral than a conservative? I think in the end, both the candidates should have been equal in moral value, but because of the stereotype, people believe that bush should be more moral.
So basically, Bush won not on any issues, local or foreign, but just because of the stereotype.
For the war in iraq, in some ways I would blame bush, but in some ways I don’t. After 9-11, I think that the US needed to blame someone and maybe the US had some side motivations for attacking iraq specifically instead of other countries (oil), but just the fact that someone needed to take the blame, iraq just happened to be the one that did. Everything is always about the mob mentality, if everyone wants to see something happen, or blame someone, someone has to take the fall. But, on the other hand, you would think that the president of the United States of all people would be able to control himself and wait until ALL the right information is correct before starting a war.
This is where I support kerry, because kerry is a man who didn’t just hide behind his father. When bush served in the military, I’m sure he had his father pull some strings in which he could get an easy job as a paper pusher. Bush never saw anything even close to war, while Kerry would be more hesitant because he actually served in a war.
But on the issue of war, I think bush should still be in office to just finish what he started, even though he did a bad job throughout the first part, changing plans in the middle of a war may cause even more chaos.
In the end, I voted for kerry because I think the United States deserves some change. Bush has cause so many problems, including violation of people’s civil rights. The US should learn from its mistakes in the past of violating people’s civil rights (Japanese internment camps and etc) and not continually break people’s civil rights.
I’ve read some of the posts, and I just think that some of them are very narrow minded.
It is true that in America you can become whatever you want, but to what degree do some people have it easier than others? Obviously it is not anyone’s fault for being born into a richer family, but you should at least help the others to gain the same opportunities or try to even the playing field a little bit.
If you consider someone who lives in the projects, they are surrounded by drugs and violence. How do you possibly expect someone to succeed in those conditions. Again, if you want to succeed, you obviously need to at least have the necessities of life, and many people don’t even know where their next meal is coming from, and you expect them to go to college and have all these aspirations? If I was that poor, my first concern would be where I’m going to sleep next, when I’m going to get my next meal, etc. There are just so many different factors that may effect different people that you can not account for all of them. You can’t expect it to be so black and white, that as long as people try, they can succeed.
Besides all of that, the issues should be someone’s main concern. A lot of them really are just based upon opinion though.
It seems to me that the biggest arguments on this forum is generalizing democrats and republicans. In the end, once a president is in office, they must be quite moderate. So in the end, the concern for democrat or republican isn’t that big of a deal, because the president must stay moderate.
Personally, I have it fairly easy, but I work very hard still. I am going to the University of Minnesota full time and my major is Electrical Engineering, and I work more than full time right now. I pay for all my own expenses. Not because my parents aren’t well off, but because I choose to pay for my own stuff. Both my parents are college graduates, one with their doctorate, and the other with their masters. We all chose to vote for kerry, because we thought that the United States deserved a change.
Sorry, tons of grammar errors, not a lot of time to write it, heh. wrote it very informally. and sorry, it's probably very disorganized.
So you feel society should pay for your poor planning? You can't be saying that I should have to pay for the fact that you were selfish enough to screw without a rubber.Radian wrote:You need to take a step back and try to empathize with people. Instead of automatically blaming someone for problems in their life put yourself in their shoes. What would you do if you got your girlfriend pregnant at 16? You may think you have the awnsers but you don't. People have to deal with situations like that every day. Situations like that lead to an inability to afford healthcare, not lazyness or appathy. .
yeah you're right, the average person can't do it.JustinStrife wrote: The fact is, he still served, was a fighter pilot(which the average person can't do),
really? show my some documented proof of that please. I thought he was in London making out with O'reillyJustinStrife wrote: while Clinton ran off to Canada.
Thank you jEsTeR!!! That is perhaps the single most intelligent political-related comment I have seen here on NICO.jEzTeR wrote:The important thing in my mind now is for everyone to realize that It is over and Bush is in charge for 4 years. We need to make sure the country is unified as much as possible so that we can get things accomplished. The people of the country have spoken. Relax and take a few cleansing breaths.
My take on the whole thing is that the majority of the country just did not feel that Kerry was going to lead the country in the right manner. There were a bunch of people that I talked to who hate Bush but would still not vote Kerry because he doesn't stand for anything. They said that he seamed to change his stand depending on how the situation was going to effect him.
The other issues were just not enough to make the difference.
I hope that we can all move past this and get along.
Best thing I have heard all year.ChunkiDori wrote:unbelivable.
california seceding from the union. let all the half wits east of california do whatever they want.
really, i know a smart political guy like you has a copy. its the part about no person having their life taken without a trial(paraphrase) and yes i believe you are right on the 9th. forgot that one. but hey, if one amendmant isnt good enough for those nutty justices then two wont either.NY94J30 wrote:
How is abortion unconstitutional under the 14th A? You mean protected under the 9th and 14th?
you my friend are quite right. "The Lord loves a cheerfull giver." if you give charitably of your free will that is admirable. if the govt takes your money by force and redistributes it, that is not.gabossie wrote:I agree with alot of this (SHOCK!). I'm very liberal, but I'm also very much a believer in a survival of the fittest sort of philosophy. All the tools that anyone needs to succeed at leat to a moderate, comfortable level are there in a capitalist system, it's the desire to use them that somepeople lack. Yes, it is more difficult for some people, but that's just how it is, and always will be. The govt really has no place in taking care of all of us, I'll take care of myself, and would prefer to keep the money that I make, that is being used to take care of others. When I want to take care of others, I volunteer or donate to charities, and that's my choice to spend my time and or money that way.
Please, stop generalizing about libs and democrats in such a demeaning manner. If for no one else, but yourself. I don't do it to you. I can ignore the occasional ignorant poster, but when trying to discuss things with those of you that I believe are intelligent, and simply have different views that myself, it really makes it hard to respect you or what you're saying when you finish your post w/ some ignorant stereotypical insult.
Oh boy.s13sr20chris wrote:you bring me to another thought. why must we try to fix everything? i think it is secular humanism come home to roost. people try to play god and level the playing field. what do you get when you attempt to circumvent the Lord and his will?
Oh....THAT "A" word. I see what you mean. Things could get ugly...Jesda wrote:Actually I was referring to the A-word that ends with "ortion".
Yesterday several of my friends made comments about how could people over in America want to re-elect W. And went off about how Bush has no morales, unless you consider the killing of innocent people a good thing.
mmm, my point was more that, with some sort of programs, you could at least help even the playing field and take such a large burden off disadvantaged people. Don't other people deserve that much? I mean, I don't support giving out money to people who don't deserve it, but there are plenty of people who work hard and try hard, and will never get out of the hole their in. I think that evening the playing field out a little bit could be beneficial to those people.JustinStrife wrote:
I'll give you an example where you are wrong in an area. When talking about how people in the project areas are surrounded by drugs and crime and are unable to escape their situation, you are neglecting the possibility of them still being able to decide on their own that they don't want to follow that path. My friend Buddy, is a prime example. He lived in a Welfare home. His mom had 5 kids altogether. Each one to different fathers. She might have been married once. MAYBE. She did drugs, she drank, she was off with her boyfriends while he came home from school and took care of his siblings. It took him another semester to graduate High School, but he did it. True he hasn't gone to college, but he's been working full time. He's got a girlfriend he's stuck with for the past 7 years(since senior year for crying out loud), and he's doing well for himself. Meanwhile his siblings are all in seperate homes now as they were taken away from the mother when buddy moved out and are adjusting to the changes before them. People can improve their lives if they want to. But they have to want to.
As for Bush getting favors from his dad while he was in the National Guard. Maybe he did, maybe he didn't. You and i don't know that. The fact is, he still served, was a fighter pilot(which the average person can't do), while Clinton ran off to Canada. And for Kerry's service in Vietnam, he dishonored that service by his actions once he returned to the states. As my dad was a 2 tour Vietnam Veteran, can vouch for, Kerry turned his back on the soldiers he served with. That is NOT commander in chief material.
You and Nathan both totally missed the point on that. I was using teen pregnancy as an example of something bad that happened beyond their control. Lets say that in this hypothetical situation they were using a condom and it broke...MaineExport wrote:
So you feel society should pay for your poor planning? You can't be saying that I should have to pay for the fact that you were selfish enough to screw without a rubber.
I don't think it should be the government's responsibility to pay for your mistakes.