Because even if I had a 350Z, Supra, GT-R, insert bad@ss car here_______, there'll still be a part of me that won't be fully happy because I don't have a 240/s-chassis. Then again, I also have some extreme obsession with these cars that probably isn't very normal.hpmachine wrote:If all you guys would buy a new s-chassis if it came out for 20 grand... why don't you buy a used 350z right now for 18 grand? hmmmm....
well seeing as I lost traction last night and screwed my DD up, I wouldn't mind traction control, since re-engaging the clutch in a wet turn broke loose the wheels causing me to understeer into a curb in the wet. I wouldn't have minded anti-lock brakes, either.3r1c wrote:
I laughed so hard because it's so true. Like seriously who the F!@# needs traction control and stability control and all that nonsense. I don't mind side airbags and airbags that is secretly hidden lols. Your rant just made my day.
Zippy69 wrote:Except mine, it smells like grape
Yes, that makes a lot of sense. I can agree to that. Although I'll need the kg conversion as I live in the US and only care about lbs, feet, and whatever it is that only we use.Soravia wrote:
If we can't agree on what should be OPTION for the new car I think we can at least agree on what should NOT be on the S16.
- No more than 1200kg on weight.- No iron block engine.- No less than 150lb torque.- No traction control w/o turn-off switch.- No ugly Sentra or Maxima coupe look.- No wide seat for fat people.- No 2 seaters.- No more 4 lug wheels.- No Drum brakes.- No FWD.- No Beam or Torsion Axle.- No Small wheels.- No narrow wheel wells.- No more than 60 on F/R weight ratio.- No 4 Door.
Probably but freakin' Nissan had to market it to the mainstream crowd by calling it a Z. Just so they could sell a couple 10's of thousands more. How dare they?!!hpmachine wrote:I mean seriously if the 350z had come out and been labeled 's16' would you guys have gone ape over it?
ive never had traction control and never needed it. ive driven rwd every year in teh snow, no probssommmatt wrote:
well seeing as I lost traction last night and screwed my DD up, I wouldn't mind traction control, since re-engaging the clutch in a wet turn broke loose the wheels causing me to understeer into a curb in the wet. I wouldn't have minded anti-lock brakes, either.
Lol greatest idea of this thread. LolNinjamasta wrote:I got a solution! Revive the S15 chassis with KA24DE engine. That would defenitely make the 20k goal. After that I would simply throw in SR in it.
im sorry but worst idea in this thread. u cant take a somewhat iconic car and cut the power in halfNinjamasta wrote:I got a solution! Revive the S15 chassis with KA24DE engine. That would defenitely make the 20k goal. After that I would simply throw in SR in it.
Ninjamasta wrote:I got a solution! Revive the S15 chassis with KA24DE engine. That would defenitely make the 20k goal. After that I would simply throw in SR in it.
wrong. they had a DIY on their site a while back on the topic of EPIC FAILURE. it was really well written and easy to follow. at the end of the tutorial, you ended up with re-used old@ss DSM motors and shoddy build quality. its a good read.White Comet wrote:^ hyundai has nothing they can teach nissan