That's a good one.KDashy wrote:A new s chassis wont make money.
Just another thing broke *** 240sx owners have to dream about.
Soravia wrote:V6 Twin-Turbo for smoking the Mustang and Corvettes. AWD option for snowy areas and wet roads. Different LSD options for drifters and muscles.
Fvcking idiot.Soravia wrote:Add in about $8K for V6 from 350Z. Not as good on handling but the car will make power to beat any Honda or Mitsubishi or Mustang.
Tell me, are you smoking something ? This topic better be a joke.Soravia wrote:possibility to outsell Honda Civic.
Although the 240sx did end up a huge failure in the US, I'm sure Nissan realizes the new gain in popularity the S-chassis has found. It depends on if this turns out to be just a fad or are the drivers going to be loyal to the S-chassis. Because a few years from now when these 240 drivers graduates from school and starts working full time, they will have the money. The question is, will they be loyal enough to buy a new S-chassis?karmakaze wrote:sorry, Nissan has people who's job is to perform market analysis and they are pretty accurate when it comes to determining what will make money and what won't. If these ludicrous ideas for an s16 could make money, they would of already gone down that path.
and you do realize that in 98 they only sold 2178 240sx in the united states right? they would be stupid to bring that back.
Modified by karmakaze at 10:05 AM 11/9/2007
Soravia wrote:They could just use the 350Z design on chassis with less aluminum parts and amount of stiff steel to reduce price and weight.
just a little bit ago u said it would be as heavy as if not heavier than the Z, but now u want it to be lighter? u need to make up your mindSoravia wrote:They could just use the 350Z design on chassis with less aluminum parts and amount of stiff steel to reduce price and weight.
you think a 500hp $30k car wont replace itSoravia wrote:That's the whole point I've been saying. the NEW S16 cannot replace 350z even if it has the same engine.
Soravia wrote: Infunity
there is not enough of an s-chassis fan base to justify bringing it out ever again.S14toRPS13 wrote:
Although the 240sx did end up a huge failure in the US, I'm sure Nissan realizes the new gain in popularity the S-chassis has found. It depends on if this turns out to be just a fad or are the drivers going to be loyal to the S-chassis. Because a few years from now when these 240 drivers graduates from school and starts working full time, they will have the money. The question is, will they be loyal enough to buy a new S-chassis?
well said.BusyBadger wrote:Casette tapes and parachute pants? Laugh Out Loud funny there!
First, lets see a show of hands on how many people here can actually qualify for a car loan for a car that costs say $25K
Everyone that doesn't have their hands raised - shut up and get back to your paper routes, lawn mowing and algebra homework.
Now that we have all the dreamers gone lets look at just three of the cars that a new S-chassis would be competing against:Mazda Miata, Pontiac Solstice, Saturn Sky
All go for $25K +/- all 4 cylinder N/A engines - decent suspensions - NO TURBO - two of them are convertibles and one of them is one of the most dependable cars ever made. Suggesting that Nissan would roll out an un-established model without knowing how successful the GTR release is (doubtless it will be a success but car companies are a little conservative, they aren't quite as loose as Phil Ivey going all in on facing two over cards on the flop).
Now look at what the same $25k can get you in a lightly used car, 350Z, STi, Evo, RX8 (despite its lemon rep), and if you want to look further back and RX7, MR2, 300Z - wow, I can't understand what Nissan is thinking not doing another S chassis. The closest thing to a new S chassis came out this year, its the new Alitma coupe - and the sporty 270HP version of that costs what - $35K?
Most of the S-petitioners wouldn't be happy with what came out if Nissan decided to put something out: too slow, too expensive, not sporty enough. Car manufacturers produce for the masses, not the minority and they have stockholders and a bottom line to be responsible to. If you really want to petition Nissan, wait until the rwd Hyundai coupe comes out and buy one - if it sells well enough Nissan may decide its a market worth getting back into.
Yep. Think about it. Say everyone active on this board, key word active, goes and buys an S16. You have an outstanding first, second, maybe even third year. Then what? Car companies are looking to establish long lasting brands, not a car that all the niche people buy and then that's it. The masses propel car sells, not the enthusiasts excluding supercars.karmakaze wrote:
there is not enough of an s-chassis fan base to justify bringing it out ever again.
It will not happen. Period. Get over it. Who cares.
Add TT Supra to that list.BusyBadger wrote:
Now look at what the same $25k can get you in a lightly used car, 350Z, STi, Evo, RX8 (despite its lemon rep), and if you want to look further back and RX7, MR2, 300Z - wow, I can't understand what Nissan is thinking not doing another S chassis. The closest thing to a new S chassis came out this year, its the new Alitma coupe - and the sporty 270HP version of that costs what - $35K?
oh no he didnt...smurf13 wrote:...will most likely sell them as soon as they get out and get good jobs
same carZippy69 wrote:The Saturn Sky is available with a turbo and I think so is the Soltace.
Both of them are available with in a turbocharged version, but I didn't list them due to price. The Sky Redline weighs in at a touch under $29K and the Solstice GXP just a shade under $28K. That's the base tc'ed model, no sport tuned suspension or leather wrapped steering wheel - the little touches (well, the sport suspension isn't little) that make a decent car much nicer. I think Pontiac even has you buy a package just to get cruise control.Zippy69 wrote:The Saturn Sky is available with a turbo and I think so is the Soltace.