240cp wrote:well if you read the FAQ it goes in explanation about the worry of lag. they explain it as heat does not create velocity volume does and at a furher distance the exhaust gasses are denser and with a smaller ar those denser gasses create a faster spool time.
they say that there turbos have full spool at under 3000 rpm. i wathced the build of the c6 corvette on power block tv a while back and that thing was wicked, barely no lag at all! also it would save you from buying a manifold and a intercooler. which i already have so wont save on that .
was just wondering what everyone thought i think im gone try it. there wouldnt be alot of fab work involved just piping. also fab work doesnt scare me at all abviously as i have already supercharged and intercooled my 240!
The FAQ is misleading. Yes, it will work. I can attach a shop vac or leafblower to a turbine and it will spin it. But turbines have higher efficiency areas of operation like compressors do. Using a smaller turbine will generally mean it's efficient operation areas occur at lower airflows and perhaps higher shaft speeds. Not ideal when you still have to feed the motor with the same compressors as you would want to with a manifold mounted turbo. Larger sized compressors tend to have higher efficiencies at higher airflows and pressures. They also run at lower speeds. Hybrid turbos already compromise this. Running an even larger mismatch between the turbine and the compressor makes the situation worse. These remote mount systems will make decent power and can be tuned for decent response/boost threshold, but they can never have the potential to make as much power as traditional turbo layouts would. Perhaps if a turbo manufacturer started designing and building turbos that were engineered to match efficiencies between the turbine and compressor for this type of use, there may be more potential.