infiniti_lineup wrote:Giant Wall-o-text.
For you I could be a chick...MinisterofDOOM wrote:If you were a chick I'd propose right now.charlieo wrote:Any family who voluntarily subjects themselves to 19 years of Camry ownership deserves all scorn and ridicule heaped on them.
At least they weren't all beige!
dre1507 wrote:It's kind of stupid to call a family bland because of their tastes in cars. there are plenty of other camry owners out there that do not lead bland lives, and until you've sat down with this family and gone through their history member by member, your point will remain illogical. For example, a rock-climber who possibly drives a camry or any of the other cars you may judge as bland. Cars are not his/her passion. they are simply a means of transportation. It's not logical to say s/he lacks living experiences. i'm with infinity dude 100% on this one.
I guess great minds think alike.dre1507 wrote:bubba. that's exactly the point infinty lineup made on page 1.
that's right, for all you know, that mom might wear a leather dominatrix outfit with a whip and the dad wears a spiked dog collar and a tutu, which would make them blend in with Nala's car club.dre1507 wrote:a 2 minute commercial about a family's tastes in cars could not have told you everything about them. so to call them bland will remain a stupid opinion IMO. i too, find their tastes in cars to be bland, but i wouldn't go about calling the people themselves bland just because of that. it's your opinion though. so i guess it ends there.
Of course it did. THAT is the source of the horror.Bubba1 wrote:Did it occur to you that Toyota's ad was aimed at their target demographic? Middle class, multicar families that view cars as appliances. Whether Toyota hired actors or used an actual family is irrelevent. There are a whole lot more people like the ones portrayed than there are enthusiasts who care more about the driving experience as opposed to reliability/functionality.
And I "could be" the Sultan of Brunei. Sadly, that isn't helping me find a 456 Shooting Brake in my garage. Or helping me find a garage for that matter.charlieo wrote:For you I could be a chick...
LOL Awesome man. You think like i do...which scares me.charlieo wrote:I watch a lot of Hulu.
Recently, Toyota has been producing shorts called "AutoBiographies". A recent one centers on the Lunds family, and is about Camrys.
The Lunds: Are all overweight. The mother, especially, has ballooned from attractive in the wedding photo to potential Biggest Loser candidate. The husband has owned a Camry for 19 years... 19 years. Of Camrys. I'll get that sink in. The livingroom which they were "interviewed" in is bland, and the wall is covered in pictures of their family. COVERED. And not exciting vacation photos... studio shots. Oh, and the son's wife is a TROLL.
I suspect these people also subscribe to the New York Times, and view Olive Garden as a fine Italian restaurant.
In short, Toyota has correctly captured a situation that if I found myself in, I'd shot myself in the face.
For your repulsion...
charlieo wrote:You keep up with your little utopia, but even PMQ, who is the master of this sort of silliness, will not say you have to be better to be promoted.
infiniti_lineup wrote:No. They've found a vehicle that suits their needs and hasn't failed them for all those years. More props to them for that, not scorn and ridicule.charlieo wrote:Any family who voluntarily subjects themselves to 19 years of Camry ownership deserves all scorn and ridicule heaped on them.
At least they weren't all beige!
Hmm, let's see - how many years have you voluntarily owned your '88 Land Cruiser? Should I start insulting you now or later?
In your world of "variety" there would be no fat people, right? GOOD ONEcharlieo wrote:Variety is the spice of life, man! The spice! And the spice must flow!
Oh boy! A fatty who can run. Tell you what, next NICOfest that's in Omaha, come on up. I'll be there. We'll get raging drunk and I'll slap you around a little. Oh and I like fatties existing... they cheer me up.Dattebayo wrote:Huge fatty makes me laugh, but quit trying to start a fight. This particular fatty lifts weights 4 times a week and can run and likes to climb. If and when he wants to say these things to my face, then I'll have it out.
He's not sick...because he didn't eat the rat poisoninfiniti_lineup wrote:I'll ignore your other unfounded attacks on me.charlieo wrote:Original point, one last time, maybe you'll finally get it:
The Lunds, with their ever-increasing beltlines, Wal-Mart furniture, multiple Camrys, and most telling, a wall full of nothing but sterile, studio portraits of their family, sure have the life. I'm jealous! Jealous of the fact they could live that life without eating rat poison.
You're a sick human being.
No way you act like this in real life. You'd be dead or in prison already if you did.

infiniti_lineup wrote:Don't you ever wonder if someone is thinking/hoping the same about you?
The 2002 WRX Wagon, 2004 SV650, 1988 Land Cruiser you all own sure aren't anything special. So, according to your mentality, you should be enjoying some rat poison too?
Car drivers are generally the slayer of motorcyclists, not the riders themselves. No-notice left hand turns by cagers across traffic are the Holocaust for bikers, not riding one.infiniti_lineup wrote:I guess. But the dangerous factor of riding a motorcycle really lies in the driver, which could be applied to a regular sedan and be compared to being of equal danger.
Who the hell is Looney? Making up fake quotes now?
And I sure hope you aren't that obnoxious motorcycle driver that lets his fat rolls and crack fall out of his pants and make people behind you throw up.
No. Remember when you said grasping for straws was incorrect? Well, calling the operator of a motorcycle a "driver" is actually incorrect. Motorcycles are ridden, like a horse or a bicycle. If you want to try an play King of Semantics (Don't play MoD, he actually is the king), you better get these little details right. I've bolded your misuse below.infiniti_lineup wrote:What are you saying? Sorry, just trying to be clear.charlieo wrote:Also, you ride a motorcycle, like one rides a horse. I know Google suggests that driving a motorcycle is an option, but it's just not right.
You're saying that riding a motorcycle is an inherited right? Not an option? Or the opposite?
Leather is the top-tier choice for protection against long slides on the pavement. You're damn right that's what you should expect from me.infiniti_lineup wrote: But then you have the motorcyclists that choose to swerve between lanes with vehicles IN those lanes and, of course, that annoying one that sneaks up to the beginning of the line at a red light. Those situations cause accidents, and that's the fault of the motorcyclist - not the drivers around them. I'd imagine that motorcycle accidents are 75% caused by the driver of such motorcycle.
Oh. Thought you might have been referring to George Clooney or something. Werd.
Leather? Should have expected that from you.
Valentino Rossi. Won MotoGP a handful of times... wearing leathers.infiniti_lineup wrote: Leather is also a fad that ended in the early 1960s. Only greased-up slimeballs (or hot women) wear them now.
"Here's an astonishing fact. If you were injured in a motorcycle accident chances are it was your fault only 20% of the time. That means that in 80% of the accidents involving a motorcycle, it was due to the negligence of another."
Whopsie - my estimate was off. Just took a guess after remembering the horrible experiences I've had with dumbass motorcycle drivers in Florida.

You're not a rider. What you're talking about are referred to as "textiles." They do not offer the impact and abrasion protection leathers do. Textiles are are superior against wetness and often better ventilated in the heat (though they make perforated leathers that flow excellent amounts of air), and they are popular with adventure riders (aka BMW GS owners).infiniti_lineup wrote:Hello, have you never heard of nylon or Kevlar? Codura? Lycra? All good alternatives that aren't passé. And offer better protection from the weather's elements than leather.
Last time: rider. If you get anal retentive about "pulling at strings," you're going to have to suffer the consequences of being pedantic.infiniti_lineup wrote:.....You're not a professional motorcycle driver. You don't need leather. Plus, you're killing cows. Good job.