Wow... you'll find a fault in anything (even if it means contradicting yourself) and argue about it.charlieo wrote:Oh, you should know that was sarcasm. I'm suspicious they're paid off.infiniti_lineup wrote:Thanks, most people are.
Plus, life isn't completely about money. It's about experiences. Of which the Lunds appear hilariously lacking in. And don't give me that "joy of raising a child" bullsh*t. They don't even have a dog!
Ok dude! You're really, really bad with satire.infiniti_lineup wrote:It's not a matter of being trumped, I've obviously trumped you in this thread already. It's more of a social order related thing.
Stop saying white-knighting, all these words "brah" "white-knighting" whatever else you said in this thread...it makes you seem like you're some fat, pimply kid that surfs 4chan.
I wouldn't say only!Otto MCR wrote: Wow... you'll find a fault in anything (even if it means contradicting yourself) and argue about it.
Where do you find happiness? Only in judging other people and pointing out THEIR flaws? Are you really that miserable?
charlieo wrote:infiniti_lineup wrote:
They're white bread. Microwave oatmeal- plain. Damn, I should go make dinner.
Whoa. Whoa whoa. You can take my love, take my land, take me where I cannot stand. But, you can't lump me in with Datte.alms24sebring wrote:
![]()
I guess I see your point but it its alittle extreme and critical. The only thing that bothered me was when he asked the brother what it was like having so many sisters, and he reacted like he fudged them all secretely on a daily basis.
I think Charlio and Dattabayo are brothers. Both like insulting and always have something critical to say about something.. no offense
I've made one ninja edit (two counting this one), and one regular edit.infiniti_lineup wrote:I just noticed how many ninja edits you made on your posts in this thread.
And I'll stake my reputation against saying that you're not anywhere as critical in real life as your are on this forum. Sure, you can say that I'm wrong, but I know that I'm not.![]()
You're a keyboard kiddie.
In order:infiniti_lineup wrote:That's two more than me. I know what I'm saying when I post it and don't have to go back and correct it.
So you've again proved two things that I've said in my previous posts:
"You're a close-minded judgmental bastard."
"In my viewpoint, you aren't better because your making fun of those who have less than you."
You don't criticize or pass judgement on your bosses or those above you in this world because you know that you're viewpoints would be rejected and cause you to be cast off your job/relationships/etc.
Common knowledge and societal order states that people that are above you in a professional capacity or personal capacity are smarter than you.
What does that make you?
If by horn you mean my pen15, I sure hope I don't lose it either!dre1507 wrote:Charlieo has a Unicorn mentality. He's better than us horses and donkeys. Don't even mention the mules. better hope he never loses those long legs, white hair and horn.
Indeed. Dude tried to make a joke about beige A-B mobiles and fat wives, gets jumped.ADDirishboy wrote:This thread sucks.
You're reaching at straws now. Just trying to get that last word in!infiniti_lineup wrote:
Still. Say what you mean and mean what you say...but don't say it mean!![]()
If I was given a reason to change something, then I would. But, if I'm not, then theres no need to change. That's not close-mindedness, that's convenience and comfortability. What don't you get about that?
That's societal order for you. Your bosses didn't get to their position by being stupid. They know what they needed to do to get to that position, and they keep doing it to keep that position. That's s-m-a-r-t.
You're not a very bright person, huh? The kind of person you'd expect to be at a KKK meeting.
I just Control-Fed both pages. You didn't mention straw ONCE.infiniti_lineup wrote:Nice copying what I said earlier!
I don't have bosses, my friend.
infiniti_lineup wrote:What's your judgement on these people charlieo?
[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0DUPQbz-F_M[/youtube]
They're terrible actors, and the "mom" is on the chubby side. So, JUDGEMENT.infiniti_lineup wrote:What's your judgement on these people charlieo?
Grasping at straws is correct as well. To say otherwise is grasping at threads. You're making no headwind with the "oh I'm so much better because I haven't admitted to editing anything" shtick either. I'm going to say you've made 4 ninja edits. That's one more than me! Look how awesome I am! Prove me wrong, bucko.infiniti_lineup wrote:
Three more edits than me now. And I actually said "pulling at strings" which is the correct way to say that statement, but that's beside the point.
Not really self-employed either, it's more of family money/business. You get a lot further higher in the ranks in that type of organization.
Ok, so you're stating that everyone of your past bosses "flipped flipped burgers or slung newspapers", but then you contradicted your entire point by stating "at one point". Obviously, they don't do that anymore. Now, they've become more successful/SMARTER than before and have achieved the rank that they had before.
VERY rarely have I ever seen someone who has achieved their position only thru seniority only. Some combination of achievements, success in their position, and approval/performance ranks have to be around in order for them to receive a higher position.
infiniti_lineup wrote:That doesn't seem to be a normal reaction. They're just a young family with children. How does that make you come to the conclusion that they are self-centered, selfish, and disgusting people? You're taking the commercial far out of context and applying stereotypical, invalid thought processes.gammer_ghn wrote:When i saw this two first appear i wanted to stab their eyes out with a sword and feed it to my dog, my x gf is so stuck up and self loving like these people they are so full of them selves wooooww, as far as i know and seen California and toyota doesn't match! it makes me want to hurt these self centered selfish disgusting people that drive side by side others and smirk when they see you mad and do everything in their power to piss you off while you are driving!
And, not in relation to your judgement on the young couple, what's wrong with a self-love? If you don't like yourself then you are greatly reducing your change of achieving happiness.
Care to explain your irrational, unproven statement with founded factual information that would have some substance and relevance to this thread?asoomal wrote:lol @ Lund...
Otherwise, GTFO
Prove it. You're dealing with regional colloquialisms and broad statements such as that are on thin ice. Or skating on thin ice, either is correct. I'll also accept tugging at threads.infiniti_lineup wrote:
Grasping at straws, grasping at threads, ANYTHING other than "pulling at strings" is incorrect. Just because they pop up on Google's suggestion list doesn't make them correct.
I have faith.infiniti_lineup wrote: And how can you prove that I've made four ninja edits? I don't see any substance behind that accusation. Prove ME wrong.![]()
More intellectually smarter. Well, with statements like that she's probably smarter than you! And no, again you're confusing success with intelligence. One can be inferior and more successful. Take you for example. You claim to make more than me. Does that make you more intelligent, and more superior? Vastly suspect. I sacrificed financial gains for a life of service to country and flying big-a** airplanes.infiniti_lineup wrote: Believe it or not, Paris Hilton is a much more intellectually smarter than either one of us, I'm afraid.
Your attempts to muddy the waters with talk of stock options, car dealerships, and tossing out phrases like "basic economics" is pathetic. You have no ground to stand on anymore, and it's showing.infiniti_lineup wrote: Back on topic - you're assuming that the event a fry cook becoming employed as a Wal-Mart assistant manager would happen. First off all, what are the salaries on each? Management position comparison, stock holding differences? All of that information is relative to even begin considering that situation. But, even if that information was provided, your assuming that the event would even occur. Basic laws of economics state that, that would never happen. You cannot move up in rank without showing some form of achievement/continuing education/etc.
Simply because I'm more relative towards a family business environment doesn't lead one to assume that I have no experience or understanding of a public/private corporation's ethics, inner-workings, and policies. Take Infiniti, for example, I've been subjected to their corporate and retailer structure for seven years and have learned almost all of their policies and inner-workings. Infiniti Corporate would never hire a Service Technician, that was fired at a BMW Dealership, as a CFO (position is open, by the way) for their company. BOOM! You're example - it's now shot down and thrown out.
Nope. It's completely possible that given two equal personnel, a promotion would be decided based solely on time-in-grade. In fact, it happens all the time. Ask union autoworkers. Nice try, though.infiniti_lineup wrote:
I won't even tackle your other example. You were stated a completely un-qualitative example as the older TSA employee is two years the older of the younger TSA employee. Either both will be promoted or outside hiring would take place (especially since the TSA is a government agency), else a workplace dispute would ensue with potential for a equal employment lawsuit.
Can you read i said toyota drivers in general in my area and seeing their spokes people acting like oh we are so cool cuz we drive a toyota omg omg omg pisses me off, im sure u havent seen their music video and all. Conservative part comes from the whole its reliable look at us we have toyotas, i dont like posers. dude you need to wake up and see what these advertisements are feeding you. Take a trip to La and you will develop the same frustration! I have friends who drive toyotas and wooow they annoy they crap out of me and that is one of the main reasons i don't associate my self with them unless i run into them. I also hate ford but i work at a ford dealer, selling fords... These commercials are annoying to the people who dislike the types of people and vehicles they drive and i am entitled to my own opinion last i checked, you seem like an intelligent man so think outside the box and put your self in others perspective to help you understand where they are coming from before your 2 cents, you are also entitled to your opinion but don't be a prophet when you try to make your point get across.infiniti_lineup wrote:So you got all of that from a 2 minute, 27 second Toyota commercial documenting the family's happy experiences with a Toyota vehicle? Who mentioned being conservative? They could be left-wing extremists for all you know.gammer_ghn wrote:What i was getting at is that they feel so highly of them selves, like oh im above you cuz im a conservative... Its like who gives a f*** i dont need to put up with you get out of my way or get in the right lane and stop driving side by side the other guy so i cant get passed and look back in ur rear view with an evil smile. They feel they can enforce their own laws of 5 miles below speedlimit. I get to a stop light they give me a lecture for passing them when they dont want to share the road. I have a very bad drive to work people are so stuck up and out of 10 cars 6 are toyotas so it raises their average therefore the bad apples are seen.
Also, you determined that the parents in the commercial drive in the left lane? I don't recall the camera showing which lane the vehicle was traveling in. They were traveling at 5mph below the speed limit? I don't recall the camera showing the speedometer.
You're subjecting unsupported and unfounded stereotypes that you've developed because of your daily work drive onto ALL Toyota drivers - or, for that matter, drivers from ALL manufactures.
So we should be OK with the fact that the "average" American is overweight and accept it?infiniti_lineup wrote:
And she isn't chubby in relation to factual information on the United State's average weight and obesity weight average. So, WRONG.
the more you post.... the more i like you....charlieo wrote:
At least they weren't all beige!
LOL. You guys are rough. Did it occur to you that Toyota's ad was aimed at their target demographic? Middle class, multicar families that view cars as appliances. Whether Toyota hired actors or used an actual family is irrelevent. There are a whole lot more people like the ones portrayed than there are enthusiasts who care more about the driving experience as opposed to reliability/functionality. FYI, if Toyota used supermodels and professional stunt drivers, none of you would purchase a camry anyway.PoorManQ45 wrote:The first two daughters shown appear to have a nice thickness...
Bubba1 wrote:LOL. You guys are rough. Did it occur to you that Toyota's ad was aimed at their target demographic? Middle class, multicar families that view cars as appliances. Whether Toyota hired actors or used an actual family is irrelevent. There are a whole lot more people like the ones portrayed than there are enthusiasts who care more about the driving experience as opposed to reliability/functionality. FYI, if Toyota used supermodels and professional stunt drivers, none of you would purchase a camry anyway.PoorManQ45 wrote:The first two daughters shown appear to have a nice thickness...
If you were a chick I'd propose right now.charlieo wrote:Any family who voluntarily subjects themselves to 19 years of Camry ownership deserves all scorn and ridicule heaped on them.
At least they weren't all beige!

bubba. that's exactly the point infinty lineup made on page 1.Bubba1 wrote:Did it occur to you that Toyota's ad was aimed at their target demographic? Middle class, multicar families that view cars as appliances. Whether Toyota hired actors or used an actual family is irrelevent. There are a whole lot more people like the ones portrayed than there are enthusiasts who care more about the driving experience as opposed to reliability/functionality.