If they punched the guy Im sure a legit charge of obstructing an officer would see it self in the court system and for a judge to pass punishment.numbnuts240 wrote:i'm brown and they get none of my sympathy. hitting women is one thing. a cop subduing an unruly perp, who happens to be female, is another. what if they started punching him. should he have just stood there, getting pummeled? call for backup and request a female officer? naive vigorous is naive.
Your assumption of "mental instability" is "weak".VigorousZX wrote:Your assumptions of the girls holding up traffic in your previous statement is weak I forgot to add.
i never said they held up traffic, i said it's a possibility that they crossed at an inopportune moment. when i walk around downtown new haven, i jaywalk. but i also wait until the coast is clear and i have ample time to cross without causing anyone to have to even touch their brakes. if i ever got cited, sure i'd be annoyed, but i'm not going to argue and piss the cop off.VigorousZX wrote:Has this happened in the past? America would be more appalled I bet.
If they punched the officer Im sure a legit charge of obstructing an officer would see it self in the court system and for a judge to pass punishment.numbnuts240 wrote:i'm brown and they get none of my sympathy. hitting women is one thing. a cop subduing an unruly perp, who happens to be female, is another. what if they started punching him. should he have just stood there, getting pummeled? call for backup and request a female officer? naive vigorous is naive.
What if you had two daughters that were mentally unstable for what ever reason (being held of their free will), should they be punched in the face for resisting arrest over and giving the officer their names?
Your assumptions of the girls holding up traffic in your previous statement is weak I forgot to add.
what else do i have to do?snwbrdr435 wrote:Tito its not worth your time
suspended for what? doing his job? ha. haha. HAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA.VigorousZX wrote:The girls looked pretty dam distressed, but like I said before, unless his ball sack was threatened, then he could have punched to his hearts content, but this is a clear use of disproportional force in my opinion. Just wait a few weeks, unfortunately, at most the guy will get suspended.
Maybe you're not seeing this right. Now wait, you're not seeing this right. As a police officer, you have to confront a bunch of strangers every day. You don't know how these people act, what their reactions are, or if they are armed, so you have to assume the worst relative to the situation. There is a reason cops get pissed off when you're all lounging in your car when they pull you over. Placing my keys on the roof of my car, telling the officer every move I'm making, making sure my hands are in full view at all times, and showing full cooperation have gotten me out of a few tickets.VigorousZX wrote:The girls looked pretty dam distressed, but like I said before, unless his ball sack was threatened, then he could have punched to his hearts content, but this is a clear use of disproportional force in my opinion. Just wait a few weeks, unfortunately, at most the guy will get suspended.
Distressed and agressive are two different things.VigorousZX wrote:The girls looked pretty dam distressed
QFTMinisterofDOOM wrote:People aren't afraid of cars. They NEED to be, or they need something else to get their brains in gear and keep them from strolling out in front of them. The commonly held (and legally supported) idea that "pedestrians always have the right of way" has led pedestrians to believe they have no responsibility for their own safety when crossing traffic. The reality is that whatever the laws may be, my car can only make certain maneuvers.
could of? first, it's could have. second, as a cop, everyone is a potential threat. what's to say that the punched girl didn't exit stage left and come back with a weapon? s***, when my mother was growing up in the bronx, her and my aunts would go out with razors in their hair in case they got into a fight (my mom's hardcore, btw). anything is possible.VigorousZX wrote:If the girls could of been dangerous, his best option would have been not to punch one in the face and try to control the other with his hands, he could have simply followed them and have backup arrive with more fire power.
right, because cracking your skull on concrete is a much better option over a swollen lip.VigorousZX wrote:I used to play rugby in high school, all this guy had to do was reach down and hold up one of the girls legs so that she'd trip to the ground.
trust me when i say i'm the last to be a grammar nazi, but this just shows your lack of education. seriously. this post has absolutely zero relevance to the points you have been aimlessly pursuing in this thread.VigorousZX wrote:If the girls could of been dangerous, his best option would have been not to punch one in the face and try to control the other with his hands, he could have simply followed them and have backup arrive with more fire power.
I used to play rugby in high school, all this guy had to do was reach down and hold up one of the girls legs so that she'd trip to the ground.
I dont get out too much... if these two girls were rough housing me like that, I would've definitely pulled a renob.
Oh my English teacher has revisited me, but with a gutter mouth now.RobPaulson wrote:trust me when i say i'm the last to be a grammar nazi, but this just shows your lack of education. seriously. this post has absolutely zero relevance to the points you have been aimlessly pursuing in this thread.
let me get this straight, trying to understand your vomit of the english language in a post.
1. He should have walked away.
2. Called for backup, who would have came with guns drawn.
3. Somehow you playing rugby is relevant to your argument.
4. He should have just grabbed one of the girls legs... even though it was not a ground altercation.
5. You are sheltered.
Now that we have broken this down. Lets analyze.
1. Walking away is not an option. You have no idea how law enforcement works. Just shut up.
2. You preach this guy used unnecessary force in a punch, however calling in a SWAT team is cool. Right.
3. You are confused.
4. They were standing, the only way to go to a leg attack from standing is to shoot in like a wrestler. Which could have hurt the girl even more than what happened. Shooting in on someone on pavement is a BAD IDEA. Cop socked the one girl LIGHTLY, let me say this again, LIGHTLY. He could have KNOCKED HER THE FUK OUT. Seriously, look at that cops shoulders and arms, he hit her WITH RESTRAINT, because he knew he just wanted to get her to back off.
5. True story.
GTFO you stupid hippie.
Then they should probably be punched in the face every dayVigorousZX wrote:teenage girls have hissy fits every day
AppleBonker wrote:Then they should probably be punched in the face every dayVigorousZX wrote:teenage girls have hissy fits every day
VigorousZX wrote: Oh my English teacher has revisited me, but with a gutter mouth now.
1&2 , this is on the members perceived notion of "what if the sky is falling"
no way, my horse is amazing, y0. not to mention, i do believe i have a much better understanding of this thread, and the situation that you ever could.VigorousZX wrote: 3 get off your high horse or actually read this thread before opening your mouth
Did you see how the cop did not put ANY of his body weight into that punch? Have you ever been trainer how to fight or even throw a punch you artsy hippie fairy boy? Let me reiterate, that punch was RESTRAINED.VigorousZX wrote: 4 he could of tripped her while still holding one leg up, stop being so anal and no it wasnt a light punch, did you see how her head snapped back.
Why? Because I am going to smack my kid if he/she does something as stupid as this? cause I would, and will.VigorousZX wrote: 5 teenage girls have hissy fits every day, I feel sorry for your future children already.
Clever, how's that working out for you?VigorousZX wrote:tard
False, I just don't believe in hissy fits slowing down the prevention of crime. I believe in listening to crime-fighters. And if you don't you get socked in the jaw, regardless of sex, age, physical/mental disabilities, etc.VigorousZX wrote:Your a Splinter in a turtle shell body, traitor.
RobPaulson wrote: Did you see how the cop did not put ANY of his body weight into that punch? Have you ever been trainer how to fight or even throw a punch you artsy hippie fairy boy? Let me reiterate, that punch was RESTRAINED.Clever, how's that working out for you?VigorousZX wrote:tard
Correct, you are now being trolled, because you have yet to present a single logical and reasonable argument to back up your opinion. You also lack the ability to convey your points in plain english. Therefore, you will be trolled. You are not worth a logical discussion because you are incapable of one.VigorousZX wrote:So you pulled the old I know you are but what am I.
welcome to amurrcah. leave your vagina at the door and enjoy your stay. oh, i'm sorry, bonjour?VigorousZX wrote:peoples rationing in this thread is disturbing to say the least.
... and should have!VigorousZX wrote:Sure he could have hit her harder
Who made you judge, I find your logic unreasonable. Your lack of tolerance for unperfect (oh no is that even a word?) english just goes to show how arrogant you are.RobPaulson wrote:Correct, you are now being trolled, because you have yet to present a single logical and reasonable argument to back up your opinion. You also lack the ability to convey your points in plain english. Therefore, you will be trolled. You are not worth a logical discussion because you are incapable of one.VigorousZX wrote:So you pulled the old I know you are but what am I.
HAkrash wrote:Your face is unreasonable.