Yeah whp is less than crank hp , that's normal. The thing to look at is the diff between the baseline stock and the v2 y-pipeblackteam02 wrote:245hp WTF?! learn-me guys, Learn me! what are we lookin @?
I don't know why it would be half, but I could definitely see it being lower than stock at the low end due to loss of back pressure. There has got to be some sort of reason that Nissan designed the original Y-pipe with such a dramatic "kink" in the pipe. I love how much low end torque my car has, I would hate to lose all of it for high end gains.mcheddadi wrote:at low end is there half the torque and HP or is that like a glitch ?
l was referring to the dyno chart just above...emprbasist wrote:
I don't know why it would be half, but I could definitely see it being lower than stock at the low end due to loss of back pressure.
From looking at the dyno it says "Stock" for the first pull, was this completely stock?(No intake, no exhaust nothing)Racingline wrote:Here is the dyno graph, I apologize ahead of time for the grainy image. the shop no longer had the original runfiles do to a computer crash so I was forced to MS paint the 2 together. I'll post an updated back to back dyno when we have the chance to run a new one
there is no dramatic drop off. the dyno operator doesn't go WOT until somewhere between 3k and 3.5k rpm. The differences you are seeing all depend on when he hits the gas. on each pull.blackteam02 wrote:. . . i dunno man, im puttin' my purchase on hold for now because of the DRAMATIC drop in HP and TQ @ the lower end of the charts. . .
We'll have to wait and see the results when everyone gets theirs installed, & i hope someone has the Artisan exhaust already cuz im curious if this Y-pipe remedies the (((droning))) issue!
He hit WOT before 3k on the stock pull but not on the Y-piped pulls? Why the difference in test parameters? I guess its hard to compare the dyno results then. I would think you would need to run all dyno pulls at the exact same condition, WOT at the same RPM, same temp and conditions and same operator, in order to be able to compare these. For max power and torque they work just fine as they are shown, but the full powerband comparison would be nice to see.Racingline wrote:
there is no dramatic drop off. the dyno operator doesn't go WOT until somewhere between 3k and 3.5k rpm. The differences you are seeing all depend on when he hits the gas. on each pull.
Racingline wrote:now that they are out and on thier way to everybody, we'll try to set up a time with another local ( stock) car for a new test. that way we can get a cleaner looking dyno graph.
+1 on these questionsrcboy514 wrote:hey rich, are you running the stock exhaust? also did you notice any fall in torque off the line?
Think you could shoot a little vid? I love the sound of my Borla right now and I'm curious as to what it sounds like after the y pipe. I don't want to ruin that beautiful sound.rich2342 wrote:Ive got the borla axle back, but with the y-pipe and intake my car sounds beastly...
everything is increased hp/tq it feels right through the entire rpm range.
Only thing is the rasp. its similar to the z's with test pipes. It ruins the sound of the borla somewhat.. Definately added a few decibals of sound over the stock y-pipe. May have to throw a resonator on
Thanks bro, those were great . Especially at the end of the second one, I was waiting to hear the sound at high RPM. It did change a little bit but not too much, so that's good to hear (no pun intended). Looks like I will be ordering mine shortly. Thanks again!rich2342 wrote:Enjoy...!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v..._page
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v...annel
rich2342 wrote:Thanks man,
I want to get it up to New england dragway a do a few runs.. Never been want to see if i can break 13's probably will require practice