no. the head design of an sr is pretty good to begin with. a p&p will only bring minimal gains.thang nguyen wrote:I had an idea, but after reading all the posts and looking at the diagrams, I got disoriented and scrambled it all up. Thanks for clearing it up, Oh are you porting the head also? To rev so high, doesn't the head need some porting to allow for a better flow of intake air?
See below...DrifterProdigy85 wrote:Was wondering why your going BC Hydraulic cams instead of HKS/Tomei/Jun Solid cams? I know hydraulic cams can be used but wouldnt more power be had from Solid cams because of the more aggressive cam lobe ramping?
Wait, so solid lifters need reshimmed every 5k miles? I think I will stick with my HL's for street use.ILikeMy240sx wrote:no you will still have to do it but I doubt that after the first 5000 miles or so, you have to change out many shims.
You will probably need to replace one or two but not many every 5000 miles after the first 5000 miles.
I know for fact that they need to be adjusted because GTI-R motors are notorious for making tappeting noise due to people not adjusting shims. They have solid lifters so thats one of the things they have to keep in check.
BTW, I just finished translating that Tomei manual... Just gotta put it into PDF now.
yes approxiamatelynonvtecaccord wrote:Wait, so solid lifters need reshimmed every 5k miles?
Probably 270s... I dont want my powerband shifted too much to the right.S13FASTBACKSR wrote:lol i feel you man..im the saaame way I love that power..im power hungry..well what size are you going with from tomei? you were going with 272's correct? the next size up from that (in tomei sizes is 280s) BC also makes a 280 from what i was told..what will 280's and the .86 look like together throughout the powerband
not going to stagger?ILikeMy240sx wrote:Probably 270s... I dont want my powerband shifted too much to the right.
in my old setup, i had HKS 256in 264out step 1 cams and loved it. In the setup I am putting together now I have 264in 272out step 2 cams.S13FASTBACKSR wrote:karmakaze what do you think the best staggered setup would be with that turbo..264/272? do you always prefer staggered over the same size cams with any turbo?
think of it like this, your engine is a air pump. it flows so many lbs of air per minute and this number varies based on RPM. Theoretically speaking, (disclaimer: these are all made up numbers! i did no real math or research) lets assume that an engines cams allow for a max flows of 25lbs per minute @7000RPM and you are running a small t28 that puts out 20lbs per minute @7000RPM. Lets say that @ 6500 your engine is pumping air at 20lbs per min. this mean that above 6500 your not going to be gaining anything except for damage to your turbo by being out of its effenciency range. lets say you throw some bad *** cams in that flow 45lbs per min. This changes the "range" of your flow. so instead of having a range of 0-25lbs that corresponds to your RPM of 0-7000 you have a range of 0-45lbs in that same 0-7000 RPM range. If you plot this on a graph you will see that the engine will now be able to flow that 20lbs at like 4000RPM (thats a guess) so you will not really see any gains above that.S13FASTBACKSR wrote:256/264 step 1 with one turbo? i am a bit confused with something though if you dont mind answering..why does a high duration cam say 272 "overkill" a small turbo say a t28..wouldnt it just make for power all throughout the powerband..the t28 spools and boosts in low to mid rpms and then it starts dying out around higher rpms..but the 272's have already kicked in a little before the t28 dies out which causes for top end power..why is that wrong? this has been boggling my mind forever now
Idk man..above 6500rpms your not gaining anything accept turbo damage b/c the the turbo is out of its efficency range? 25lbs per min cams and a 20lbs per min turbo at a 500krpm difference sounds like a close enough efficiency range to me lol ..how close do you have to be?!?! idk though im sure im looking at it wrongkarmakaze wrote: lets assume that an engines cams allow for a max flows of 25lbs per minute @7000RPM and you are running a small t28 that puts out 20lbs per minute @7000RPM. Lets say that @ 6500 your engine is pumping air at 20lbs per min. this mean that above 6500 your not going to be gaining anything except for damage to your turbo by being out of its effenciency range.
Those are not real numbers. I was just using it as an example. that 500RPM may not make any difference. but that little bit was irrelivent to the point i was trying to make. Maybe someone else will chip in and explain it better, or correct me.S13FASTBACKSR wrote:Idk man..above 6500rpms your not gaining anything accept turbo damage b/c the the turbo is out of its efficency range? 25lbs per min cams and a 20lbs per min turbo at a 500krpm difference sounds like a close enough efficiency range to me lol ..how close do you have to be?!?! idk though im sure im looking at it wrong
is that all, they hardly took anything off huh?ILikeMy240sx wrote:Got my rocker arms back from the machine shop.
They tried with a mill and couldnt do it so they did it with a grindstone instead.
Total cost $45 for all 8 rocker arms.
Oh and I placed an order for Tomei Solid 270s god I cant wait to get those.