any reputable exhaust shop should be able to do it. Take into consideration that for a stock n/a ka you don't need to go that big. 2 1/2 should be more than sufficient. You can go 3" but you will pay more and most likely not benefit from it anymore than going 2 1/2".Night_Stalker wrote:Can i bolt up a 3inch cat back exhaust to my stock 240sx exhaust, without a conversion piece after the cat?
kouki s13? what kinda conversion are we talking about?Scuffed_ChukiCoupe wrote:what is necessary to do a kouki conversion on an s13, other than the obvious body parts.
If you tightened your muffler bearings... you wouldn't be saying that.Kckouki wrote:Hey guys, whats better an sr or ka ?
My ka-t from the factory isnt cutting it.
leaking oil. check under the car or anywhere near the radiator if it is excessively black and dirty, due to dirt and oil. everything else is pretty much like looking for 240s (i.e. rust)Scuffed_ChukiCoupe wrote:Hey papa, any little details that one may want to look at when buying an fc3s? Common problems with these cars?
5 speed shops should cost around $500 (give or take 100), including parts and labor. as far as 240s, it really depends on where you live and what condition its in. I wouldn't spend more than $2,000 on an s13, and more than $4000 on an s14lobstermagnet88 wrote:Hey folks. my name is Kyle, and i live in Northern Va.. yes thats much different from southern Va.. lol..i dont have a car right now. my last one was totaled by a fed ex truck, it was a pos neon.. i just started working again, and im savin all of it for my car.. im really likin the 240's now, but alot of the ones i like are auto... so just wonderin how much trouble/money it would be for the transmission swap, and how much do ya think a good 240 might cost me?.. thanks much for your help
91 octane manufacturer recommended (says so on the manual). If your running turbo, 91/93 octane required.rakers wrote:What is the Nissan recommended octane level for the 1993 240sx coupe?
I bought one used a few months ago and have been trolling these forums for a while learning this and that. What a great resource!
Mine is bone stock and has 198,000 miles on the original engine. The previous owners took good care of it and it has no problems that I know of (knock on wood) other than an unsightly few dents.
I've read various things about octane levels, but haven't heard a definitive answer for somebody running a completely non-modified high mileage 240. Unless a K&N air filter counts...
Anyway, I look forward to hearing back from you guys.
Thanks.
The previous owner of my coupe said he only ran 91 for one tank, and ran 87 every other tank for the 5 years he owned the car. I've tried 91/93 as well as 89 and 87. For some strange reason, it runs best on 87, but I think it's because it's an abused old engine that's about to die.rakers wrote:Thanks. What should I expect to happen if I put in 87, or 89?
I do like to push the car occasionally.
Woot ! Someone put that KA in its OG habitat. (truck)PapaSmurf2k3 wrote:
But seriously... your S10 didn't really come with a KA-T from the factory. Someone must have removed that junk chevy motor and put one in.
BULL**** !qat727 wrote:
My hatch
You've got to be kidding me here. Chevrolet has made better engines than the KA ever aspired to be. Iron Duke for the win.Kckouki wrote:Woot ! Someone put that KA in its OG habitat. (truck)
Kckouki wrote:BULL**** !
Well, the reason yours probably ran best, is that the previous owner could have run 87 octane at the point that he got it inspected or got a tuneup. If he did that, lots of times they adjust the timing and stuff based on what fuel you have in it. So, he brought it in with 87 octane, and they saw that it was putting out too much NOx, and therefore had to retard the timing. After that (without changing the timing back) it would probably run best on 87 octane, although if you put in 91 or 93 octane, and adjusted the timing after that, it would then get better mileage/performance.qat727 wrote:
The previous owner of my coupe said he only ran 91 for one tank, and ran 87 every other tank for the 5 years he owned the car. I've tried 91/93 as well as 89 and 87. For some strange reason, it runs best on 87, but I think it's because it's an abused old engine that's about to die.
My hatch, on the other hand, has KA24E pistons in the KA24DE (= high compression). I was still experiencing detonation with 93 octane, although I believe it may have had something to do with the timing, considering the car doesn't run at all now.
Easiest way to check is to run a tank of each, check your fuel economy and how it acts, then run whatever acts the best.
Are you really serious? Show me more than a handful of chevrolets, especially 4-bangers, that can go 200k+Take your iron dookie with 200k and slap a turbo on it running 12psi and see what happens.qat727 wrote:
You've got to be kidding me here. Chevrolet has made better engines than the KA ever aspired to be. Iron Duke for the win.