If you run at an incline, it increases your workout substantially.EZcheese15 wrote:Ok, I started on 1/4 at 232 lbs. My goal is 200 by summer, and able to run a 5k no problem.
So I'm 6 weeks in, and as of tonight I'm at 216. So my weight is half way there, so I'm doing good and ahead of my goal. I'm up to 2.4 mi in 24 mins on the treadmill (0 incline for now), so that's coming along well too.
one question: when was the last time you drank 24 sodas in a 5 hour period?PapaSmurf2k3 wrote:I've never woken up after a "hard night of drinking soda".
Similar to what I had last night, only sans pasta and cheese.PapaSmurf2k3 wrote:^hahah. I can't stand celery, but carrots are A-OK in my book. Side note: I actually prefer running on an incline, it seems to be much much better on my knees. Probably why I did so much running when I was in Germany. I lived on the side of a freaking mountain ridge or something, and I used to run up it all the time, and walk back down (it was BRUTAL on the knees on the way down). I worked at Bosch and the building was at the top of the mountain thingy, along with a bunch of kick a** bike trails... everything was in place for me to lose massive amounts of weight, and I did. I wish I had a setup like that around here.
Update for me: 172.6 lb today. I can't really seem to crack 170... but I'm sure it will come.
I pulled a Bex last night and made food that actually tastes good. Lightly Saute'd onions and mushrooms with garlic and chicken, then dumped in a few shots of rum and some grated cheese (Alcohol helps it to bond together for some reason), and tossed it in pasta... sooo kinda garlic butter cheese chicken pasta with onions and shrooms. It was bangin.
PapaSmurf2k3 wrote:I pulled a Bex last night and made food that actually tastes good.
Good question... I don't know if it was 24, but I've definitely had a lot in a 5 hour period nursing a hangover (in Germany), as well as back in the day when I was a kid and didn't drink. I used to slam some Dr Thunders. I can honestly say I've had more than 12 in a 12 hour period for sure... like I said, I went an entire week drinking nothing but soda, while working in a kitchen sweating my balls off, so my intake was pretty huge.numbnuts240 wrote:
one question: when was the last time you drank 24 sodas in a 5 hour period?
That's a lot of kosher salt and I don't think anyone would be eating that much. Kosher salt is great because you need very little and opposed to masking the flavor of food it helps enhance it.nissangirl74 wrote:It's in EVERYTHING! I would definitely keep an eye on labels. also, eat tons of fresh fruit and veggies (without the salt). You can't go wrong there.
Last fact of the day before I go start on supper
There are 1,920 mg of sodium in one level teaspoon of kosher salt.
FYI - eating an apple or of a celery stalk burns more calories than you will gain from the fruitEmpty V wrote:You have to be careful because there's lots of sugars and carbs in fruit so eating fruit as a replacement isn't necessarily beneficial
I think that's true for Celery and Lettuce (and maybe some other veggies), but I'm almost positive that's not true for apples.nissangirl74 wrote:
FYI - eating an apple or of a celery stalk burns more calories than you will gain from the fruit
Congrats! It's always nice seeing hard work pay off, and I truly believe that changing eating habits is hard work.nissangirl74 wrote:I finally went and bought myself a scale today. I've lost four pounds since last month (if my scale and the doctor's weigh the same). I've also lost an inch around my waist. All this has been from changing my diet. Exercise has been nil. I've got too much to do to devote the time i need to to help the progress along. Hopefully things will ease up in the next month or so and I can start a walking regimen.
FYI - eating an apple or of a celery stalk burns more calories than you will gain from the fruit
I think my mom told me that at some point. Nurses hear all sorts of stuff.PapaSmurf2k3 wrote:
I think that's true for Celery and Lettuce (and maybe some other veggies), but I'm almost positive that's not true for apples.
Yeah, I didn't see apple on that list. There are definitely more foods listed than I thought were catabolic though. It makes sense. Apples are just really high in sugar. Bananas (from what I understand) are high in potassium, but also kinda fatty and suggary. We should get Ray in here.nissangirl74 wrote:
I'm not sure how reliable the source is, but I found this.
http://www.burningbodyfat.com/....html
Not sure if my numbers are the same for enlisted soldier, but they're very close.nchopp wrote:Right now I'm working on building up my Army Physical Fitness Test scores. For a perfect 300, you need:77 pushups in 2 minutes82 situps in 2 minutes2 mile run in 13:18
PapaSmurf2k3 wrote:
Yeah, I didn't see apple on that list. There are definitely more foods listed than I thought were catabolic though. It makes sense. Apples are just really high in sugar. Bananas (from what I understand) are high in potassium, but also kinda fatty and suggary. We should get Ray in here.
PapaSmurf2k3 wrote:
Don't be so concerned with this catabolic food thing. Its all relative. For instance, one apple contains just as much carb (I'm going to say carb, not sugar, and will explain later) as 3/4 of a cup of pineapple. There is no "apples are higher in sugar than oranges." You have to look at it relative to the serving size. If you want to compare apples to oranges (excuse the PUN) 1, 4oz apple has the same amount of carbohydrates and calories as 1, 6.5oz orange or a 1/2 cup of fresh or unsweetened 100% orange juice.
So you have the "why?", how about the "how?" The reason I say "carb" instead of "sugar" is because there are different forms of sugar- all of them playing a different role in energy, calorie density, and digestion & formation of "energy."The three simplest, and by default, easiest and best forms of "sugar" for you to consume are monosaccharides. You may have heard these terms before: - glucose. "Blood sugar", the immediate source of energy at the cellular level - galactose. The sugar in milk and yogurt - fructose. Found in honey and fruit. This is the sweetest of all sugars. High Fructose Corn Syrup (HCFS) contains a lot of this *in unnecessary amounts I might add*The other "sugars" are disaccharides aka, 2 sugars: - sucrose. Glucose + fructose = Common table sugar. Table sugar is made by refining the juices of sugar cane and sugar beets and becomes granulated. Depending on the extent of refining, it becomes brown, white, and powdered sugars that you're familiar with. - lactose. glucose + galactose = Major sugar in milk. Depending on the milk's far content, lactose contributes 30-50% of milk's energy. This is why skim milk and 1% milk are best for you when dieting. - maltose. glucose + glucose = Product of starch/carbohydrate digestionThese are the most basic and common forms of sugars that you will hear about most often. There are many, many more, but these will serve our purposes well. Basically, the sugar that you are trying to eat when losing weight should be simple and derived from sources where it isn't added. I could go on and on about complex carbohydrates, the amount of carbs in starch, fruit, milk, and vegetables, and how they interact with your blood and insulin, but thats another lesson for another time.
The lesson I want to teach today, based on the confusion I see, is the Glycemic Index. In simple terms, Glycemic Index (GI) is the effect of various sugars in the blood. wakopedia actually puts it quite well. You'll be well served to read this article for a better understanding.http://en.wakopedia.org/wiki/G...foodsThe provided table on the site is actually very useful, too.Basically, what you want to do is consume more items that are low GI foods than high GI foods. Not coincidentally, these are usually less calorie dense too. However, these foods will release glucose more slowly and steadily, and serve to keep you FULLER LONGER, thus preventing you from snacking on high GI foods that will not satisfy your hunger quite as long.
Also, bananas ARE NOT FATTY, and cabbage does not have that much sodium unless its been added. http://oto2.wustl.edu/men/sodium.htm (When reading/research, its also advisable to check for a .edu in the website name)
And saying apples are high in sugar is 50% true. When you guys say "sugar" I think you mean sucrose, aka table sugar. Which makes that statement false to me because apples contain fructose, a very simple and easy form of sugar to digest and use for basic building blocks of body processes.
As always, please feel free to post and ask nutritional and diet questions. Like James' "I'm new to 240's and I have a question" thread," I'll try to get to this post daily and see what I can help out with. Good luck, and keep up the hard work, guys!