No, my 2008 AWD never did it before and after the TCM/ECM reflash, it still not doing it.maverick_rogue wrote:Noticed this morning that after CVT TCM/ECM re-programming , it slightly lurches/ jerks while coming to a stop. I noticed it a number of times at traffic signals stop. Did you or any one who had this reflashing done experienced something similar? Its not an issue as such but just a minor thing.
Not sure where you got this information? I don't believe this reflash should change the top gear ratio used at highway speeds, you're already using the highest gear ratio of the transmission so I don't think it's possible for the rpms to reduce, and it doesn't appear that this was the intent of the reprogram anyway, it's more geared toward lower speed performance. Or perhaps I've missed something?whatmorecanyousay wrote:Hey this news is encouraging. I just added the TCM/ECM reflash to my service call on Monday.
If the rpm at 70 comes down to 2100 that is an improvement of 500 rpm'sless on my wifes car. My 2008 ford with a 6spd transmission turns at 2000 rpmat 80 MPH and I get better millage on the road (27mpg+) than the Rogue.This could improve the road end but might diminish the lower speed benny on the Rogue as discribed. whatmorecanyousay
kerrton:kerrton wrote:
Not sure where you got this information? I don't believe this reflash should change the top gear ratio used at highway speeds, you're already using the highest gear ratio of the transmission so I don't think it's possible for the rpms to reduce, and it doesn't appear that this was the intent of the reprogram anyway, it's more geared toward lower speed performance. Or perhaps I've missed something?
Actually I am quite happy that Nissan took the time to carefully research the problem and fully test any software updates before releasing them.maverick_rogue wrote:Overall, I am happy I did it. Why didn't they release this software update patch earlier?
I presume the software they used was copied from any other model (May be Murano) and they scaled down load parameters.It might have worked well in road tests but certain driving conditions might be putting too much strain on the CVT resulting in reported noise issues. This meant extra long time to rebuild the software and testing approval and so on.....Again this is just a hypothesis and I am glad to see Nissan standing behind its product by extending its warranty to 10 years.philipa_240sx wrote:
Actually I am quite happy that Nissan took the time to carefully research the problem and fully test any software updates before releasing them.
I too believe they have done thorough testing this time. In a couple of months we will get to know the results in this forumphilipa_240sx wrote:I go back to my story about the MINI CVT... they were releasing software updates continuously. My friend must have had the CVT programming updated a dozen times or more... it was a joke! Just test it 100% and be done with it!
Is this for sure... not trying to doubt anyone. Just want to know for sure to make sure the wifes driving style is kept as conservative as possible. Thankskerrton wrote:Just something to keep in mind, when you had the new reflash/reprogram, your computer was reset and should now be in learn mode again.
Today I was told that the TCM for my Rogue was unavailable and on backorder, and they couldn't get ahold of anyone to find out when they expected to get them in. I hope nobody else has this problem when they get the software update. Now my Rogue is sitting at the dealers, and I am driving a used Chevy Cobalt loaner car that they were nice enough to give me.....IdaCrue wrote:Went in to get my TCM reprogrammed yesterday. After about an hour the service manager came out and told me that the TCM kept hanging up while they were reprogramming it. They contacted Nissan Technical Services and were informed that, from all indications, the TCM was bad (fried). They have a new one on order, and I have a Chevy Cobalt loaner car. They had done several before mine without a problem, and I know the Tech they had work on it, he is one of the best in the shop.......I don't know what happened, but I am without my Rogue
Thanks Phil for clarifying, I apologize for not being completely clear from the start.philipa_240sx wrote:The TCM (transmission) and ECU (engine) computer both have a 'learning mode'. It's primary purpose is to compensate for component wear/tolerances... fine tuning if you will. Different drivers using the same vehicle will not 'screw' things up. Here is why:
1) The self learning features are continuously running and small adjustments are made over a long time period. It occurs very slowly, not in hours but rather the total life of the vehicle.2) The adjustment range is very narrow, in many cases you will not even notice it occurring.
If anything, the more conditions you drive under (cruising, sporty driving, etc) the more data the computer can gather and actually tune the systems quicker and more accurately. So get out there, drive your Rogue and enjoy it!
Yep, layers of bureaucracy lining the pockets of people is not an exclusive American idea. Apparently it happens in Japanese companies as well.BigPapi’sRogue wrote:Got mine re-programmed (on transmission # 2) yesterday morning, and the noise is gone. Amazing how much money Nissan ate on transmission replacements, isn't it. Of 6 Rogue owners that I either know personnally or "know of", 3 have had their CVT's replaced (including me). 1 of those 3 is even on his third transmission.
Anyways, ...
Can someone please either point me to a link or give some more detail on what previous posters have described as the TCM being in "learning mode?" On the surface, this doesn't make much sense to me because both my wife and I alternate between who drives which car. When I drive, its mostly highway driving over long distances, high speeds, with little braking, and when my wife drives its just about the opposite: short distances, lots of stop and go, low speeds. Seems to me it could get good and screwed up.
Well this one is out of left field, and kinda over my head, what are you getting at here?RogueGuy45 wrote:
Yep, layers of bureaucracy lining the pockets of people is not an exclusive American idea. Apparently it happens in Japanese companies as well.