J-Spec Tuner wrote:Im not saying i nessecarily disagree with this person, but i cannot stand fanaticle s*** like this:
Yes, in the day of laser guided bombs the american army randomly lobs bombs into civilian towns.
bush earns money from this how?
anybody else have trouble swallowing this?
im glad we have these wepons, When you know how something works, the beter prepared you are to fight against it. And we all know our government has a big reputation for using chemical wepons on our enemies :rolleyes
so i guess the stock piles of french armerment illigally sold to hussein were all just figments of our imagination.
well because the tens of thousands of civilians that hussein murderd might stand out a bit more to some people.
im not even going to continue to point out what i concider large falacies in his completely one sided argument. He goes on to talk about civilian casualties as if the american army is making no effort to prevent them, while at the same time is condoning that the pro-saddam militia is dressing in civilian clothing and fighting americans. He equates bush to a moddern day hitler, something that i take massive offense to. Hitler was out to erradicate an entire creed and expand the third reich over the entire world. Do you see america waging war with entire continants and setting up deathcamps for iraqis? "war is hell" and a war without civilian or soldier casualies has never existed.
Im sorry if some of you dont agree with me, there is nothing i can do about it.
Jesda wrote:
Did the US have to fight in WW2? No.Did the US have to send 200 marines to Africa to save 500,000 people from the control of rebels? No.Did the US have to remove Saddam and his sons, who throw people live into woodchippers and put children in hard prisons? No.Did the US have to save South Korea from Chinese and North Korean communists? No.
-Jesda
Jesda wrote:Wow, thanks for the conspiracy theories and other useless bull****. My IQ has increased zero points from this thread. Much of the garbage spewed is no better than typical knee-jerk vernacular used to tug at emotional heart strings at the expense of logical and coherent thought.
Guess what kids, there are only TWO companies on this freaking planet that can do the oil infrastructure repair and service that Halliburton does. ONLY TWO! And other oil companies like BP outsource such jobs to... HALLIBURTON! The US government picked a company with vast experience, and Cheney, having had a FORMER position at the company, knows this best. Cheney's finances by the way, are kept in a private trust he has no access to or control over, as required by law, to avoid conflict of interest.
When you whiners drop the clever one-liners and come up with some research and have hard truths, check back with me.
By the way, I'm thankful for the past US presence in Thailand. It saved my birth country from communist control and is probably the reason my relatives are ALIVE. They are out in the rural areas that are prone to communist propaganda and/or brutal recruiting techniques. If not for the US, I'd probably be in Thailand living under a communist regime, or dead along with the rest of my family.
Dissent is a necessary part of a free market of ideas, but emotionally driven propaganda is an unfortunate downside (like the essay presented to us here), so we take the bad with the good and enjoy free speech.
Fighting brutal regimes, saving the world over and over and OVER... the world owes the US many thank yous.
Did the US have to fight in WW2? No.Did the US have to send 200 marines to Africa to save 500,000 people from the control of rebels? No.Did the US have to remove Saddam and his sons, who throw people live into woodchippers and put children in hard prisons? No.Did the US have to save South Korea from Chinese and North Korean communists? No.
We're hard-working, generous people.
Its one of thousands of reasons I'm proud to be a US citizen.
-Jesda
Cold_Zero wrote:Yes,The world is a horrible place now that Saddam Hussein is gone! We should just give the country back now that we have not found Weapons of Mass Destruction. "Sorry Saddam" we really didn’t mean to take over your country.
Why the hell do people think that GW invaded Iraq for money and oil? It’s costing the American Tax payers money to keep that country going and no oil is flowing out of it? Makes no damn sense.
yashin wrote:while were on the line
Did the US have to back and support a overthrow of the popularly elelcted marxist of regime of Salvador Allende and replace him with dictator Augusto Pinochet who went on to kill tens of thousands of innocent people? No. Did it? yes
Did the US have to financially/economically/politically back the Shah of Iran as he retook power from a popularly elected democratic government that had taken power from the Shah, the same Shah who was well known for being a tyrant, murderer and oppresor of free speech?? No. Did it? yes
Did the US have to support Ferdinand Marcos a brutal dictator, and tyrant who killed thousands and stole money from his own people? No. Did it? yes
Did the US have to support the Duvalier family dictatorship for 30 years in Haiti, and then oppose reformers in Haiti? No. Did it? yes
Did the US have to support a military overthrow of the democratically elected Venezualan President Hugo Chavez (this happened around 2 years ago)? No. Did it? yes
Did the US have to support Saddam Hussein and give him the money, and military hardware, and support and chemical weapons that he needed to fight a war against Iran. Which allowed Saddam to gain even more power?? No. Did it? YesI could go for a very very long time. But i beleive my point has been made.
Jesda wrote:Wow, thanks for the conspiracy theories and other useless bull****. My IQ has increased zero points from this thread. -Jesda