It's not a moon. Endor's a planet. It is Endor's moon that the death star orbits. Where's YOUR geek status now?BusyBadger wrote:(and don't get into some semantic debate citing Endor as a moon).
It's not a moon. Endor's a planet. It is Endor's moon that the death star orbits. Where's YOUR geek status now?BusyBadger wrote:(and don't get into some semantic debate citing Endor as a moon).
So you're using physics in a sci-fi discussion (SW is more sci-fantasy)? I could understand invoking physics if you're talking about Star Trek as the franchise mentions various sciences frequently, but Star Wars ignores everything and just uses sci-fantasy as a setting and disregards the "messiness" of reality.Dattebayo wrote:It's a fact of physics that a moon cannot have a moon. The pull of the host planet is too great, a course correction would have to be made in order to fake an orbit like that.
Odd, the movie (Admiral Ackbar specifically) refers to it as the "forest moon of Endor", while even most SW geeks call it Endor. And while it is called a moon there is no planet shown in the movie but the novel (I've read it) mentions that the planet was actually destroyed. Furthermore, the Ewok TV series shows the moon orbiting a gas giant while the Ewok cartoon shows it orbiting a binary star. Clearly, even the Star Wars franchise can't get its story straight, is it any wonder why most Star Wars geeks simply refer to it as Endor.MinisterofDOOM wrote:It's not a moon. Endor's a planet. It is Endor's moon that the death star orbits.
Firmly in place between my comics collection and a box full of D&D books (1st Edition, of course).MinisterofDOOM wrote: Where's YOUR geek status now?
They're clarifying WHICH of Endor's moons they're referring to. Not the other moon, the forest moon. That's how I always took it anyway. How often do you use that kind of working for nomenclature? Do you say "That's the planet of Saturn." No. You say "That's saturn." But "That's the larger moon of Mars" would refer to Phobos as opposed to Deimos.BusyBadger wrote:Odd, the movie (Admiral Ackbar specifically) refers to it as the "forest moon of Endor", while even most SW geeks call it Endor.
swirlies are where it's at. right after you collect some lunch money.themadscientist wrote:I want to give this thread a wedgie for some reason....
lol my mom and i continue an on-going wet willie battle of biblical proportions. which reminds me, she hasn't been one-upped in some time nowmarlin29311 wrote:Wet-willie FTW.
Sounds like we're on the same page. In the movie when Ackbar says "The forest moon of Endor" it sounds like the moon's name is Endor and he's using "forest" to describe the geography and climate. The only reason I knew the difference is because I had read the book before I saw the movie (yeah, I know - big geek).MinisterofDOOM wrote:
They're clarifying WHICH of Endor's moons they're referring to. Not the other moon, the forest moon. That's how I always took it anyway. How often do you use that kind of working for nomenclature? Do you say "That's the planet of Saturn." No. You say "That's saturn." But "That's the larger moon of Mars" would refer to Phobos as opposed to Deimos.
No, that's what my Western tactics are for.charlieo wrote:The Great Wall of Semantics can't protect against the Mongolian Horde!
Here's how that fight would play out:Chaotic_Warlord wrote:So in a battle between Emperor Palpatine and Q who would win? Q is omnipotent and can only be destroyed by other Q's but at the same time Palpatine is a Sith Lord. The only reason Vader was able to take him down was by committing suicide in the process.
