i agree, 100%Death Star all the wayMinisterofDOOM wrote:Death star. Not even a fair match. The cube wouldn't even stand a chance against a super star destroyer.
They also have those viral machines that convert others into Borg.Dasoupdude wrote:I know nothing of star trek and the borg, but don't they have teleporters(?) where they can materialize themselves on board the death star?
They do. They can also adapt to energy weapons at a very fast rate, so blasters wouldn't be much use for long. But one shot from the deathstar would finish off a cube completely. Of course, if Borg were on the deathstar when the cube was destroyed, they could trying and set up a base there. In First Contact, borg beamed to the Enterprise as it destroyed their sphere and began taking over the enterprise and its crew.Dasoupdude wrote:I know nothing of star trek and the borg, but don't they have teleporters(?) where they can materialize themselves on board the death star?
What about the Picard maneuver?MinisterofDOOM wrote:Ships from both universes can travel at faster than light speeds. But neither of them use it for anything but long distance travel. You don't use warp or transwarp in combat unless you're pursuing someone else going that fast. For fighting a stationary object, warp is useless.
Sure, whatever you say there chief.BusyBadger wrote:Size matters not.
I don't think you can fire at a non-transwarp object from transwarp. Transwarp is like "hyperspace"...you'd be on a different "level" of space from your target.Dattebayo wrote:Transwarp has nothing to do with light speed. Quit confusing the issue.
Fixed.MinisterofDOOM wrote:Picard maneuver was done at warp, not transwarp.
Not exactly, but this singular tactic is close enough to cite - Picard Manuever. There's just a huge technological disparity and Star Wars just happens to be on the lower tech end. The sensors and ingress/egrees speeds available in the Trek universe alone really make this outcome very one-sided and obvious to all but the most strident fanboys.MinisterofDOOM wrote:It's not like you have time to react to a laser canon firing and warp out of the way.
Actually, the Borg don't even need to use the weapons on the Cube. Just transport a few clones through the DS shields and start assimilating stormtroopers. Sure the Borg would lose a few (say three or four) clones before they adapted to the blasters wielded by the troopers but they don't care - they're relentless. It'd be over without the Borg firing any shots. A Borg Death Star, now that's a thought.MinisterofDOOM wrote:The cube's weapons would be like mosquitos to the death star. It'd take ages of constant damage to inflict damage worthy of notice.
Funny you say this, that's just what the Imperials thought in the first Star Wars movie and look how well that turned out for them.MinisterofDOOM wrote:Doesn't matter how technologically advanced the cube is: it's still an ant attacking an elephant. The Elephant can endure for a long time and only has to get lucky once.
The fail is strong with this one...BusyBadger wrote:Not exactly, but this singular tactic is close enough to cite - Picard Manuever.
Get back to us when you understand the intricacies of transwarp drive.Dattebayo wrote:The fail is strong with this one...
There you go. Get in through the armor and you're good. But that's not death star vs borg cube, it's death star vs shuttlecraft. If you want to start throwing other craft into the mix, the Death Star was designed to house star destroyers and tie fighter squadrons. As I said before: the cube isn't even a match for a super star destroyer. Get a fleet of them on it and they're boned.BusyBadger wrote:Maybe the Borg just need to assault the Death Star with a shuttlecraft.
Let's be clear here: I won. So yeah.numbnuts240 wrote: