lolChaotic_Warlord wrote:If a nerd, dork, or geek can think of a vs. match it's probably there.
That site is old as hell, the list there is just the current list of battles, search a character or check their forums their are some REAALLLLLY good matchups.Dattebayo wrote:
lol
"Children of the Corn vs. The Stepford Wives"
HA!
James Blond?snwbrdr435 wrote:James Fail!
Dude you are Epic fail, I copied and pasted that link in and it took me to a google search with this thread being the only result. Wow what a dumbass.Mr1der wrote:Buck Rogers gonna handle this s***.
[img]http://www.buck-rogers.com/film_and_ser ... buck01.jpg[/]
Yeahps, I've seen some of them before. I just thought it would be interesting to hear nerds who also show an interest in Nissans.Chaotic_Warlord wrote:Dasoupdude, this discussion is the kind of debate that makes SW and ST geeks jizz in their pants. It's been discussed to death all over the interwebz, their are actually sites built and dedicated about who would win in a ST vs SW battle not just the borg vs ds but also Enterprise vs DS, Force vs Q Continuum, ect... Actually if you search on youtube there are some decently made videos with various scenarios using clips from each.
pfft those are simply Bobba Fett, and Batman win via CurbstompChaotic_Warlord wrote:If you want a good topic for your speech class putting geek vs nerd in a heated debate you should try a little harder, like for example, who would win Master Chief vs Bobba Fett, or Batman vs Captain America.
^THISflohtingPoint wrote:
Droids cant be assimilated, this is true. On the flip side of this, how many droids in Star Wars are even worth anything in combat? Even the ones that are decent are a worlds less sophisticated than a Borg soldier.
The Borg are a collective mind, meaning that they're one huge super computer making computations per second that are unparalleled in the whole Star Wars universe, let alone one droid. While the droid may be thinking a bit ahead in terms of what to do in battle, the Bord would have the whole battle strategy finished, along with about a billion other sub-strategies for given variables.
I see your challenge and raise you one better, Spawn vs. Superman Prime, as proposed here...Nali wrote:
pfft those are simply Bobba Fett, and Batman win via Curbstomp
You want a tough one you have to go much deeper like:Superman vs The Void SentrySuperman
The Void Sentry
The Void Sentry cant die, morgana tried and he just came back as if nothing was wrong.Superman is nigh invulnerable, so this fight could take ages.
Spawn can do anything, he only chooses not too cuz he knows everytime he uses his powers they slowly diminish. He recreated the whole frikkin planet, we should all call him GOD.Chaotic_Warlord wrote:I see your challenge and raise you one better, Spawn vs. Superman Prime, as proposed here...http://lounge.moviecodec.com/v...47115/
MinisterofDOOM wrote:Death star. Not even a fair match. The cube wouldn't even stand a chance against a super star destroyer.
rofl...all I did was finish the image tag in an edit and it showed up.Chaotic_Warlord wrote:
Dude you are Epic fail, I copied and pasted that link in and it took me to a google search with this thread being the only result. Wow what a dumbass.
Is this what you meant to do?
No shields, and nukes are still a big deal in BSG. An B-wing could potentially rape a basestar.themadscientist wrote:A challenger appears!
This is totally untrue:MinisterofDOOM wrote:Ships from both universes can travel at faster than light speeds. But neither of them use it for anything but long distance travel. You don't use warp or transwarp in combat unless you're pursuing someone else going that fast. For fighting a stationary object, warp is useless.
You're kidding, right?Chaotic_Warlord wrote: If anyone can show blue prints that show it having the ability to move on its own power or some form of evidence that shows this,
A: Rotation has nothing to do with orbitB: The Death Star has ion engines and can travel.C: Neither Death Star was built in orbit around a planet. Both of them were hidden away in deep space. Remember in Episode IV, the heroes commenting on a Tie Fighter being so far into deep space alone shortly before discovering that it was headed to the Death Star?Chaotic_Warlord wrote:Since we are back on topic, I don't think the Death Star rotates, I think it just flows with the gravitational rotation of the planet it was built around
GTFO.Chaotic_Warlord wrote:Since we are back on topic, I don't think the Death Star rotates, I think it just flows with the gravitational rotation of the planet it was built around, therefore all the Cube needs to do is just impulse power itself to the DS's backside to keep itself safe from the Super Laser. There is absolutely no evidence that the Death Star is capable of self motivation, it's just show to be built within firing range of the the Planet it's going to destroy.
I'll agree with you on the first Death Star but the second?MinisterofDOOM wrote:C: Neither Death Star was built in orbit around a planet. Both of them were hidden away in deep space.
It's a fact of physics that a moon cannot have a moon. The pull of the host planet is too great, a course correction would have to be made in order to fake an orbit like that.BusyBadger wrote:(and don't get into some semantic debate citing Endor as a moon).
I wouldn't call him a man, maybe more of a fish...ERIC s.-14 wrote:Do these Borg guys have the superior strategic military ambushes and create a trap that can only be detected by one man??