Nope, those will be ok, especially if you have some really grippy tires. The rates I'm using equate to 9.8 kg/mm front and 8 kg/mm rear.WI_S14_Goldie wrote:just curious...is a coilover set-up of 8/6 or 8/10 too stiff for autocrossing?? I've talked a few guys who autocross and most of them run a spring/shock combo...
Haha, thanks. Tried the teflon tape and took it for a 30 minute shakedown and no leaks so far.DJButton wrote:Let me know if the teflon tape doesn't fix that leak I have access to AN fittings etc and sell high pressure lines, can try and help you out if you need it. Rear 1/4's don't look bad at all considering it was BFH work!
Uhh, for now I'm using a 2" dia. PVC pipe with a incorrectly-sized throttle body coupler and a custom duct tape coupler on the MAF. I'll be making an aluminum pipe in the near future, but this works for now. The idle is steady at 900. Ghetto fabulous .mirochuki13 wrote:Looking good. Nice job on the rear fenders. I'm not sure if you mentioned this, but what did you use for relocating the air intake? Did you make your own pipe, or does someone sell it?
Exhaust is a blitz realize tt (kind of heavy, but it'll do for now). Congrats on the S14, can't wait to see it.hai1206vn wrote:Matt, good job with the engine bay. What exhaust are you running?
I'll see you at RIT in a few weeks! got an s14 recently
If you want suspension adjustability without spherical bearing, i suggest SPC performance parts http://www.racinglab.com/spc-camber-kit-089.html (you can find individual components on ebay easily)
They make tension rods, camber plates, rear camber, rear toe, rear traction links, all adjustable with stiff rubber bushing. I've tried the tension rods and been impressed so far. I'm gonna get the complete rear eventually.
I have the Tein camber plates already, so that's been taken care of...hai1206vn wrote:that's good to know. I just thought it might be useful for him since he's running konis. I'm leaning toward coilovers so I won't need that
I've heard that the tein camber plates end up being ~1" taller compared to the cusco plates. If that's true, switching to the cusco would get you a bit more shock travel when lowered.nissanman04 wrote:
I have the Tein camber plates already, so that's been taken care of...
They are definitely firm, but not nearly as bouncy as the megans I had on there before. The koni dampers feel great so far.sloweighty wrote: so how are those springs feel, do they feel bouncy or are they smooth
Hmm...interesting point. That would help the issue a bit, but it's a little late now I suppose.scole wrote:
I've heard that the tein camber plates end up being ~1" taller compared to the cusco plates. If that's true, switching to the cusco would get you a bit more shock travel when lowered.
Cool...I've seen your car around campus and at pep boys once last week. Looks good!Automato wrote:nice buildup for autocross. i go to school at RIT and will be running in the events this year as well. i will be running in SM with my black sileighty and i will get absolutely rocked because of in-experience and a setup that lacks quite a bit. its all fun and games for me though, as some other ppl said earlier, maybe someday i will build my car to be competitive in my class. for now its just my dd that i can enjoy on track days. see'ya later this month.
http://www.ground-control-stor...II=73sloweighty wrote: so where did you get those springs and what brand name are they
Haha, yeah, that's not on purpose...I can't use adjustable toe links. I actually didn't want any toe back there. At least there's not as much now as there was previously.brokeAs240sx wrote:Never seen a setup w/ toe out in the rear for rwd vehicles, let me know how that works out for you.
what if I -hypothetically- hit a concrete barrier w/ the pass. rear corner last year? (hypothetically of course, that scuff on the bumper there is just a coincidence)brokeAs240sx wrote:Yea, class rules suck don't they
You can try what some guys have done w/ mild success (of course, you just got an alignment, so maybe not), but if you unbolt the suspension parts - i.e. traction arm, ruca, & toe, sometimes you can move the suspension - in this case, moving the spindle in toward the front & out toward the rear, thereby increasing the tendency to toe in.
Did your car ever get rear ended or something?
From both my 240's & friends' 240's, w/ stock toe arms, no matter what height the car, we never had a problem w/ getting toe in - no one ever had toe out. Of course, I think most of us had/have ruca's, so that may have something to do w/ it.
You mean everyone should compete in stock class then?Soravia wrote:Adusting the car too much, doesn't that defeat the purpose of driving skills?
All depends on the way you drive... for the most part, alignment settings don't make a bad driver faster at all; however, a good driver can benefit from it.Soravia wrote:I meant that for toe/camber adjustments to make a car corner better while decreasing the ability to go faster on straight lines, etc.
It's like the car is being tailored to go around the cones and not the driver doing it. That's how I feel like anyway. Especially because this is not really about who is winning what position but about making the best time a driver can get with his skill.
But that's my view of autocross anyway.
Soravia wrote:Adusting the car too much, doesn't that defeat the purpose of driving skills?
Umm...what? I don't understand your thinking on the subject. Just because I am making setup changes to my car doesn't mean that I am letting the car do all the work for me. What if these settings actually make the car perform worse than before? I have no idea what the car will do, honestly. It is all a learning experience. The attempt to make the car have better ultimate grip is an attempt to get faster times, yes, but it is also more fun to drive a car that has a higher limit. In some cases, it is more difficult to drive a car that is prepared in this fashion, so I may not actually be making it easier on myself.Soravia wrote:I meant that for toe/camber adjustments to make a car corner better while decreasing the ability to go faster on straight lines, etc.
It's like the car is being tailored to go around the cones and not the driver doing it. That's how I feel like anyway. Especially because this is not really about who is winning what position but about making the best time a driver can get with his skill.
But that's my view of autocross anyway.