Post by
95lstegman »
https://forums.nicoclub.com/95lstegman-u33967.html
Sun Dec 18, 2005 7:06 pm
then you do it. sounds like a total waste to me. just get a dam small turbo and a bigger one and run them in parallel with a valve that switches between them. you'll save weight, space, and headache. plus, the hardware is already out there, and cheap. you can get misc. piping and actuators from stock TT vehicles with unequal turbos like the Supra and RX-7.
and for the OP, the reason i say NO FMU is quite simple. sure, some companies do it, but that doesn't mean it's right. food for thought:your stock injectors run at about 45psi of fuel pressure, which ramps up to something like 55psi or whatever under WOT. the stock fuel pump is limited to between 65-75psi depending on the model and condition, and flow rate at that pressure will not be optimal anyways, so you upgrade your fuel pump. great. with an FMU using stock injectors, you'll need about a 12:1 rising rate for boost. this means +12psi of fuel pressure for every 1psi of boost. so now your fuel pressure under full boost is no longer a nice, injector-friendly ~55psi, but a rough 55+(12*7)=139psi. do you think injectors were made for this? no, they weren't. do you think the walbro fuel pump was made to deliver this kind of pressure? no, it wasn't. it was designed for that much overall flow, but not at that pressure.
hence, people using FMU's often will experience injector death down the road, and unless they are fortunate enough to have a wideband to detect it very early, their engine will be toasted by the failure. i've seen it plenty of times in the Honda world, and Nissan's don't have some godly injectors that are immune to an untimely, overpressurized death.
so go ahead and offer an FMU with it, but as always, i recommend to everyone that asks me about boost not to bother with a kit that offers an FMU unless it's optional. it's ALWAYS a waste of money.