WALMART - Racial Incident

A General Discussion forum for cars and other topics, and a great place to introduce yourself if you are new to NICO!
Veriest1
Posts: 3686
Joined: Wed Apr 14, 2004 5:23 pm
Car: '96 BMW M3
'93 Nissan 240SX coupe dd

Post

PoorManQ45 wrote:I never understood america's fear of suppressors.

Seriously, they are a courtesy to people around you!
Actually in some small European countries it's illegal to discharge a firearm without one.

Personally I'm a fan of Czechoslovakia's firearm laws. IIRC, and unless something has changed in the past year since I looked into it, when you come of age you can take a psych eval (and maybe some training classes) and if you pass you get a license to own guns (sorta like a drivers license). At which point you can go buy firearms to your hearts content... and carry them concealed.

Also, there's no reason law abiding citizens shouldn't be able to own full auto weapons of any sort. It's a mostly useless capability in all but a few select instances. I mean have you ever seen the muzzle rise on even a semi-auto AK47? There's a reason the M16's we issue are select fire.


User avatar
93coupe
Posts: 12924
Joined: Mon Oct 03, 2005 3:03 pm
Car: crap
Location: Maryland

Post

IB4Gwizz

User avatar
PoorManQ45
Posts: 16676
Joined: Fri Jul 02, 2004 5:13 pm

Post

snwbrdr435 wrote:
You sir are incorrect. Each state is entirely different and in MA each town is different. You have no idea how hard it is for some of my friends to legally own guns especially in places that they might actually need them to defend themselves or their loved ones, from people who don't care to take the time legally own a fire arm.
You probably don't get the NRA newsletter.

This is changing. Chicago's ban on handguns was recently overturned by the supreme court as a violation of the second amendment.

User avatar
snwbrdr435
Posts: 12721
Joined: Thu Jun 28, 2007 7:07 am
Car: 85 VW Westfalia, CBR F4i, SV650s, 1988 Honda Hawk(race)
Location: People's Republic of MA
Contact:

Post

PoorManQ45 wrote:
You probably don't get the NRA newsletter.

This is changing. Chicago's ban on handguns was recently overturned by the supreme court as a violation of the second amendment.
They just met and talked about it the ruling will come in June.

User avatar
Urabus GodofTraction
Posts: 6178
Joined: Wed Nov 03, 2004 4:36 pm
Car: 2002 Subaru WRX Wagon
2004 Suzuki SV650
1988 Toyota Land Cruiser
1994 Honda XR600R

Post

Space Monkey wrote:due to the stopping power and chance of death compared to a normal bullet they have been outlawed.
*snicker*
Space Monkey wrote:I don't see an issue here... Would this be a hindrance of your liberty? It's just a safety protocol because if you do go off the deep end we find you before you kill more people than if we did not know about you, we save lives.

Are you one of the people that complain about privacy right all the time? *just a question, I don't want to debate that*
Of course you don't see an issue. You're selling your freedoms one at a time in exchange for bubble-wrapped clothing, and you're ok with that.

You find me concrete evidence that magazine/clip size has had ANYTHING to do with an increase or decrease in fatalities. If you can't you're nothing more than a frightened child, parroting the lies fed to you.


User avatar
Urabus GodofTraction
Posts: 6178
Joined: Wed Nov 03, 2004 4:36 pm
Car: 2002 Subaru WRX Wagon
2004 Suzuki SV650
1988 Toyota Land Cruiser
1994 Honda XR600R

Post

Veriest1 wrote:Personally I'm a fan of Czechoslovakia's firearm laws. IIRC, and unless something has changed in the past year since I looked into it, when you come of age you can take a psych eval (and maybe some training classes) and if you pass you get a license to own guns (sorta like a drivers license). At which point you can go buy firearms to your hearts content... and carry them concealed.
Not quite! No mil surplus ammo, no hollowpoints, no automatic weapons, no "military rifles," no silencers/suppressors. You also need a more stringent license to carry concealed. My NRA-ILA book was publish in 2006, a quick googling shows it's current.

User avatar
Space Monkey
Posts: 661
Joined: Thu Feb 07, 2008 1:22 pm
Car: 1990 Nissan 240sx

Post

charlieo wrote:You find me concrete evidence that magazine/clip size has had ANYTHING to do with an increase or decrease in fatalities.
Common sense and simple math are easy concrete evidence that a gun with more bullets has the opportunity to kill more things.

Ignorance Is Bliss.

User avatar
Urabus GodofTraction
Posts: 6178
Joined: Wed Nov 03, 2004 4:36 pm
Car: 2002 Subaru WRX Wagon
2004 Suzuki SV650
1988 Toyota Land Cruiser
1994 Honda XR600R

Post

Space Monkey wrote:
Common sense and simple math are easy concrete evidence that a gun with more bullets has the opportunity to kill more things.

Ignorance Is Bliss.
Should we ban cars over 100hp, too? Anything more is more opportunity to speed...

Your common sense is broken.

Veriest1
Posts: 3686
Joined: Wed Apr 14, 2004 5:23 pm
Car: '96 BMW M3
'93 Nissan 240SX coupe dd

Post

charlieo wrote:
Not quite! No mil surplus ammo, no hollowpoints, no automatic weapons, no "military rifles," no silencers/suppressors. You also need a more stringent license to carry concealed. My NRA-ILA book was publish in 2006, a quick googling shows it's current.
Interesting, I'm sure you're right though because my digging was confined to handgun and concealed carry laws.
Space Monkey wrote: Ignorance Is Bliss.
Apparently so.


User avatar
Space Monkey
Posts: 661
Joined: Thu Feb 07, 2008 1:22 pm
Car: 1990 Nissan 240sx

Post

charlieo wrote:
Should we ban cars over 100hp, too? Anything more is more opportunity to speed...

Your common sense is broken.
You're going to compare shootings to speeding?

Also, HP bans are already in affect in both Canada and the USA.

Stop Trolling.

User avatar
Solar_Runner
Posts: 914
Joined: Fri Nov 24, 2006 4:27 pm
Location: Rio Rancho, NM

Post


User avatar
Razi
Posts: 28373
Joined: Sun Dec 31, 2006 9:52 am
Car: Moo

Post

A decrease in bullet capacity is pointless.You can reload the gun you know....

Just because the gun can hold less bullets doesn't mean the user won't kill more people.

User avatar
dre1507
Posts: 4355
Joined: Sat Nov 07, 2009 7:41 pm
Car: Some boring Lexus that's currently at home with a smashed mouth (crashed).
Location: Miami, FL

Post

Jim: So the point of this thread was to.......tell about Walmart's failure of an intercom system?Jane: No, silly. Because Walmart's intercom system is a failure, we have to look at the governmental differences between Canada and the United States on the issue of gun control.

Modified by dre1507 at 4:25 PM 3/18/2010

Modified by dre1507 at 4:28 PM 3/18/2010
Modified by dre1507 at 4:34 PM 3/18/2010

User avatar
Space Monkey
Posts: 661
Joined: Thu Feb 07, 2008 1:22 pm
Car: 1990 Nissan 240sx

Post

Razi wrote:A decrease in bullet capacity is pointless.You can reload the gun you know....
Your understanding of a gun is very good sir

Any untrained person will not be able to reload the gun without being taken out first. Any trained person would not attempt a mass shooting with a regulated clip...

The point to the clip being regulated at 5 shots if for the least amount of impact a registered gun can make at one given incident.

I understand there are occasions where this will do nothing to help a situation, but there are times if comes in handy and those are the ones that count.
Razi wrote:Just because the gun can hold less bullets doesn't mean the user won't kill more people.
It limits the amount of shots the user has at the given time causing the user to put themselves at more risk to be caught or countered at the time of re-load.

All i can do is understand WHY the laws are there. I do not enforce them, nor care they are there as they do not effect me at all.

I do not need a gun to defend myself from the occasional hooligan. If they had a gun and already had it out pointing at me, then my gun would be useless anyways.

User avatar
PoorManQ45
Posts: 16676
Joined: Fri Jul 02, 2004 5:13 pm

Post

Space Monkey wrote:
Common sense and simple math are easy concrete evidence that a gun with more bullets has the opportunity to kill more things.

Ignorance Is Bliss.
What? So you are making the assumption that if you give any gun owner a weapon that holds more then the specified number of bullets that they will automatically use them to harm others? That makes no sense.

Veriest1
Posts: 3686
Joined: Wed Apr 14, 2004 5:23 pm
Car: '96 BMW M3
'93 Nissan 240SX coupe dd

Post

Space Monkey wrote:I understand there are occasions where this will do nothing to help a situation, but there are times if comes in handy and those are the ones that count.
I think this is the fundamental difference between many Americans and other country's citizens - we understand that freedom isn't free. It's a shame when the cost is the ultimate price one can pay but it's no reason to reduce the personal liberty or responsibility of the citizenry. This is because it's not really the individuals freedom that matters so much as it is the freedom that comes to the whole population when they collectively retain their individual freedoms.

User avatar
ProudNissanFreak
Posts: 2438
Joined: Tue Dec 09, 2008 3:34 pm
Car: 2005 Imaginary WRX STi, 2003 Civic

Post

Pokemon! Gotta catch 'em alllllll

User avatar
Urabus GodofTraction
Posts: 6178
Joined: Wed Nov 03, 2004 4:36 pm
Car: 2002 Subaru WRX Wagon
2004 Suzuki SV650
1988 Toyota Land Cruiser
1994 Honda XR600R

Post

Space Monkey wrote:
You're going to compare shootings to speeding?

Also, HP bans are already in affect in both Canada and the USA.

Stop Trolling.
New one! Alcohol! You don't need 80 proof drinks! Everyone should be happy with their 6 proof Bud Lite. Any more and people ruin their and other people's lives! Florida is among several states to ban the sale 40oz bottles. How's that doing to curb drinking problems? I mean, it's sooooo much easier to get drunk off of a 40oz bottle then it is the 32oz bottle stores offer in their place...

I can't think of a single ban or limitation on horsepower in the United States. And horsepower isn't even a constitutionally granted right!

You're an ignorant sheeple (sheerson?). Thank god you can't vote in my country.

Notice how the Canadian has been brainwashed into believing the solution relies on the authorities coming to the rescue...

S13_love
Posts: 2364
Joined: Tue Sep 02, 2008 7:00 am
Location: PNW

Post

Space Monkey wrote:You're going to compare shootings to speeding?
I don't see a problem with this.
Space Monkey wrote:Also, HP bans are already in affect in both Canada and the USA.
I wasn't aware that we had a HP ban in the U.S. ....oh, wait...we don't.

User avatar
snwbrdr435
Posts: 12721
Joined: Thu Jun 28, 2007 7:07 am
Car: 85 VW Westfalia, CBR F4i, SV650s, 1988 Honda Hawk(race)
Location: People's Republic of MA
Contact:

Post

charlieo wrote:
New one! Alcohol! You don't need 80 proof drinks! Everyone should be happy with their 6 proof Bud Lite. Any more and people ruin their and other people's lives! Florida is among several states to ban the sale 40oz bottles. How's that doing to curb drinking problems? I mean, it's sooooo much easier to get drunk off of a 40oz bottle then it is the 32oz bottle stores offer in their place...

I can't think of a single ban or limitation on horsepower in the United States. And horsepower isn't even a constitutionally granted right!

You're an ignorant sheeple (sheerson?). Thank god you can't vote in my country.

Notice how the Canadian has been brainwashed into believing the solution relies on the authorities coming to the rescue...


^ Im buying you one if i ever meet you.
Modified by snwbrdr435 at 10:00 AM 3/19/2010

User avatar
RicerX
Moderator
Posts: 2703
Joined: Thu Jan 29, 2009 9:36 am
Car: '20 Titan Pro4X
Location: Southeastern US

Post

Space Monkey wrote:
Common sense and simple math are easy concrete evidence that a gun with more bullets has the opportunity to kill more things.

Ignorance Is Bliss.
Gosh that's such a great idea. Why didn't I think of that? Because obviously people that want to shoot up an embassy are going to follow the gun laws. "I killed twelve people, but I had to reload twice because I was using the proper clip."


User avatar
Urabus GodofTraction
Posts: 6178
Joined: Wed Nov 03, 2004 4:36 pm
Car: 2002 Subaru WRX Wagon
2004 Suzuki SV650
1988 Toyota Land Cruiser
1994 Honda XR600R

Post

snwbrdr435 wrote:


^ Im buying you one if i ever meet you.
I drink Maker's Mark in pretty much every form. On the rocks and with ginger ale top out the list.

User avatar
RustyBucket
Posts: 143
Joined: Mon Dec 28, 2009 2:04 pm
Car: '94 Infiniti Q45

Post

charlieo wrote:Notice how the Canadian has been brainwashed into believing the solution relies on the authorities coming to the rescue...
May I suggest Mr. Pot has a look in the mirror before saying things about Mr. Kettle?

The USA has one of the highest rates of incarceration in the world. That sounds a lot like relying on the authorities coming to the rescue and locking away the "Bad People". There is also the "terrorlst" boogeyman that seems so effective at getting new regulations introduced.

User avatar
PoorManQ45
Posts: 16676
Joined: Fri Jul 02, 2004 5:13 pm

Post

RustyBucket wrote:There is also the "terrorlst" boogeyman that seems so effective at getting new regulations introduced.
Oh Snap!

A man after my own heart!

I agree 100%... If we want to get this thread locked down quickly we can discuss the BS that is "Homeland Security" and this fictitious terrorlst threat.
RustyBucket wrote:The USA has one of the highest rates of incarceration in the world. That sounds a lot like relying on the authorities coming to the rescue and locking away the "Bad People".
I can't speak for anyone but my family, but if you commit a crime towards my family on our property you will be shot

User avatar
Urabus GodofTraction
Posts: 6178
Joined: Wed Nov 03, 2004 4:36 pm
Car: 2002 Subaru WRX Wagon
2004 Suzuki SV650
1988 Toyota Land Cruiser
1994 Honda XR600R

Post

RustyBucket wrote:May I suggest Mr. Pot has a look in the mirror before saying things about Mr. Kettle?

The USA has one of the highest rates of incarceration in the world. That sounds a lot like relying on the authorities coming to the rescue and locking away the "Bad People". There is also the "terrorlst" boogeyman that seems so effective at getting new regulations introduced.
You won't hear me unrealistically relying on the authorities, Mr. Bucket (horray, the containers for names theme continues!).

My solution for "Bad People" and terrorists are remarkably similar... two in the chest, one in the head. Also education. I giveth and I taketh.

911 is for telling the coroner to bring the oversized ziplock bags. Also fires.
Modified by charlieo at 2:35 PM 3/19/2010

User avatar
PoorManQ45
Posts: 16676
Joined: Fri Jul 02, 2004 5:13 pm

Post

charlieo wrote:My solution for "Bad People" and terrorists are remarkably similar... two in the chest, one in the head. Also education. I giveth and I taketh.
When in doubt, double tap that bitc*

User avatar
s0m3th1ngAZ
Posts: 3856
Joined: Fri Mar 25, 2005 10:11 am
Car: 96' Miata
2014 Focus ST

Post

All guns should fire flowers.

User avatar
Dattebayo
Posts: 33288
Joined: Sun Aug 25, 2002 10:04 am
Car: 2004 Nissan Frontier Desert Runner
Location: NE DC

Post

Space Monkey wrote:Common sense and simple math are easy concrete evidence that a gun with more bullets has the opportunity to kill more things.
You fu*king hypocrite.

User avatar
Bmore-coupe
Posts: 6440
Joined: Fri Sep 26, 2008 4:00 pm
Car: 08 Altima Coupe 3.5
Location: Baltimore, MD

Post

PoorManQ45 wrote:
When in doubt, double tap that bitc*
If that was a Zombieland reference, that movie was great.

User avatar
PoorManQ45
Posts: 16676
Joined: Fri Jul 02, 2004 5:13 pm

Post

Bmore-coupe wrote:
If that was a Zombieland reference, that movie was great.
It was


Return to “General Chat”