That's because you entire country's population is only slightly more than all of California's. When you got a whole lot more people, you tend to have a whole lot more things going on.Space Monkey wrote:We do have criminals, although we don't have a regular occurrence of mistaken use of fire arms causing harm to our "too stupid" citizens. We also don't have a lot of gun armed incidents.
This is a misconception that many don't understand. Yes that statement is true, but also flawed. Even if you have more people the ratio of incidents would be the same if it were happening here. Canada's ratio for fire arms incidents is far lower that the states making your statement false.Dattebayo wrote:
That's because you entire country's population is only slightly more than all of California's. When you got a whole lot more people, you tend to have a whole lot more things going on.
The large majority of gun related crimes are committed using guns that were not acquired lawfully.Space Monkey wrote:We do have criminals, although we don't have a regular occurrence of mistaken use of fire arms causing harm to our "too stupid" citizens. We also don't have a lot of gun armed incidents.
Not really. If you follow the rules, it takes ~6 months to get a FA weapon. On the other hand, I can have one tomorrow if I were to go the black market route.Space Monkey wrote:This is just scary retarded. Who needs a FAW to defend their home? Unless you are already doing incriminating things?
Well clearly you didn't understand what this means.Space Monkey wrote:This is a misconception that many don't understand.
Figure it out smartypants.Dattebayo wrote:When you got a whole lot more people, you tend to have a whole lot more things going on.
Your point is invalid. It has nothing to do with reasons as to why you have such a large problem with fire arm incidents.PoorManQ45 wrote:
The large majority of gun related crimes are committed using guns that were not acquired lawfully.
Also an invalid factual opinionated statement.PoorManQ45 wrote:Not really. If you follow the rules, it takes ~6 months to get a FA weapon. On the other hand, I can have one tomorrow if I were to go the black market route.
So, the people committing these crimes don't follow the rules to get their weapons. So regulations won't matter.
We don't have the enemies that America has for good reasons.charlieo wrote:All I need to know about Canada is that it's easy to get into and easy to leave.
That and they live in a giant padded crib provided by their government.
You also have more protection forces (local and government) per person than Canada has. There are many other aspects to consider Dave. You can't just say it happens because you have more people in your country. My previous statement proved your ideology incorrect.Dattebayo wrote:
Well clearly you didn't understand what this means.
Figure it out smartypants.
You didn't prove sh*t... You just don't understand what I said, obviously. Or how I meant it. Or anything, pretty much. More people = more problems, proven fact. Nobody said it was directly proportional, you assumed that. Go take a sociology class or something.Space Monkey wrote:My previous statement proved your ideology incorrect.
Huh? We have over 10 times as many people in the USA.Space Monkey wrote:
Your point is invalid. It has nothing to do with reasons as to why you have such a large problem with fire arm incidents.
I thought this was funny...Is that bad?lino wrote: All black people, leave the store now.
Dattebayo wrote:
You didn't prove sh*t... You just don't understand what I said, obviously. Or how I meant it. Or anything, pretty much. More people = more problems, proven fact. Nobody said it was directly proportional, you assumed that. Go take a sociology class or something.
Uh, I agreed with that point...but i also showed that it can be false. If you only compare things one way you make skewed results. You must take percentages for ratios and other perspectives into account or you can not claim fact on anything without bias.Space Monkey wrote:Yes that statement is true
Pulling out the wakopedia stats eh? Unfortunately that does not show the crime involving fire arms.PoorManQ45 wrote:
Huh? We have over 10 times as many people in the USA.
The crime rate in the USA is 4982 crimes per 100,000 residents. This is from 2004.
The crime in Canada is 7,518 reported incidents per 100,000 people. This is from 2006.
What is your viewpoint on firearms? I personally have 7 firearms right now. Yet I have not, and have no intention to harm anyone unnecessarily. I don't understand what you're getting at.
Are you suggesting that having a gun makes you more likely to commit a crime?
This is indeed correct.Space Monkey wrote:If I'm not wrong, any American can go get a gun at any time regardless of their knowledge of the weapon?
XenonSE-R wrote:So, kids, that means that if Canada had a 100% annual homicide rate, the US would only have to have a 10% annual homicide rate to match actual homicide numbers.
Right, because your neighbor to the south acts like a shield. If Canada did for itself what the United States does for it, Canada would be up to it's ears in problems, too.Space Monkey wrote:We don't have the enemies that America has for good reasons.
Maybe, but that is all speculation.charlieo wrote:
Right, because your neighbor to the south acts like a shield. If Canada did for itself what the United States does for it, Canada would be up to it's ears in problems, too.
I don't see an issue here... Would this be a hindrance of your liberty? It's just a safety protocol because if you do go off the deep end we find you before you kill more people than if we did not know about you, we save lives.charlieo wrote:Canadian gun controls laws are considerably stricter than our local Canadian is implying. You have to be a member of a range to own a handgun, semi-automatic centerfire rifles are limited to 5 round mags, handguns 10, and you have to obtain authorization to move a handgun to and from a range.
PoorManQ45 wrote:I never understood america's fear of suppressors.
Seriously, they are a courtesy to people around you!
counter point?Space Monkey wrote:
LoL This is true. Pop bottle, potato, ect...PoorManQ45 wrote:Seriously, if you wanted to silently kill someone you can make a suppressor very quickly out of household items.
I didn't ask about the law, I asked for your viewpoint on the subject.Space Monkey wrote:Suppressor is illegal in Canada.
Why no hollow points? They are more humane then FMJs. Can you have truncated cones?Space Monkey wrote:You may purchase the ammunition required for your gun, but no hollow points n such.
References pwn you. It was towards d!ck.PoorManQ45 wrote:
I didn't ask about the law, I asked for your viewpoint on the subject.
I am not very knowledgeable about ammo or guns in general, although i believe due to the stopping power and chance of death compared to a normal bullet they have been outlawed.PoorManQ45 wrote:Why no hollow points? They are more humane then FMJs. Can you have truncated cones?
You sir are incorrect. Each state is entirely different and in MA each town is different. You have no idea how hard it is for some of my friends to legally own guns especially in places that they might actually need them to defend themselves or their loved ones, from people who don't care to take the time legally own a fire arm.Space Monkey wrote:If I'm not wrong, any American can go get a gun at any time regardless of their knowledge of the weapon?