so whats up Darryl are you throwing in a turbo in your 3.5dangeris wrote:Sometimes reading these posts gives me a chuckle. Anyone here that has the 3.5 knows that this motor is awesome and is very fast. I love it that no matter how many horses our motor comes with, it's still not fast enough. hell, it could be 500hp form the factory and still we'd be looking to drop twin turbos if possible.
I want to know too..surmanm wrote:so if i wanted to turbo my 3.5 cvt what price range am i looking at for ALL parts and transmission cooler??
just emailed them to get some solid numbers we will see what they saydeasonz wrote:
I want to know too..
6000$ without installsurmanm wrote: just emailed them to get some solid numbers we will see what they say
But I want a turbo!! I wonder what install would cost.. Another 2K?surmanm wrote:yep they just emailed me back 6k with everything dam that's a hit... but i want a turbo so bad oh man. i dont even want to think how much it will cost to install
Way to bring up an old thread.. good job Got carried away with the M's, no, there is no M4. Regarding Blake's car ... I was simply comparing his car to the current stock BMW line up... to begin talking about adding chips and exhausts and intakes and Sh*t is a bit asinine as to the point I was trying to make. But to corrcet you, the 335 is putting down , what, ~265-270 to the wheels stock (given only a 10% drivetrain loss, which os generous) Perhaps a tune and an exhasust can add an extra +100whp, perhaps it couldn't... again it bears no relevance to the point I was trying to make in my response to an earlier post... but thanks for the input, I'm guessing you have a BMW, hence the hurt feelings...Mikecom32 wrote:
I'm sorry, I know this post is old as sin, but I had to correct this.
First off, there is no BMW M4. There is, however, a BMW Z4 based M Roadster, but I believe you called this a "ZM".
Also, the 335i with the 6 speed and a chip should put down somewere around 365 wheel, with no exhaust or intake. I'm sure with some other bolt-ons, you could grace 400rwhp. I'm thinking that would win if raced against a 320whp FWD car.
I'm not bashing the project at all, just this dude.
As far as the project goes: simply amazing. I've always wondered how these CVT trannys would do with some mods. Super clean install and a great kit! Someone really put some thought and skill into this one. Great job guys!
Sorry to hear about the blown transmission!
Did you not read this post??08altima35 wrote:do all of you expressing interest have a cvt? transmission cooler or not, the safe amount you can boost a cvt (transmission cooler or not) is not worth the price when measuring whp gain vs. cost.
With the transmission cooler it has been solid ever since..speedforce180 wrote:The transmission did not blow.The pressure solenoid blew.There is a big difference between a $100 solenoid and a $2000+ transmission.However,the car had a new pressure solenoid put it a few months agon and then we installed a big transmission cooler and the transmission has been rock solid ever since. I am in possesion of Blakes car right now since he had to go to Iraq for awhile. So I will try to post some updates every now and again. So we did figure out if you are going to turbo the CVT,you need to upgrade the transmission cooler.We have a package for that now too
Tim
According to Blake it has. He's had the transmission cooler for over 2 months now and driven it both nice and hard with no effect. I think it is resolved. The only thing that is up in the air is the same damn question I've been asking SFR but has yet to reply to...and that is, will the transmission cooler be an added cost to the aleady high $5500 turbo kit, or will this be added to the kit at no additional cost?deasonz wrote:With the transmission cooler it has been solid ever since..
it's not worth it for a 3.5 why would you turbo a 2.5 it would cost your more than just gettin a 3.5. and a 3.5 has the vq35de same as the 350z i like to think the altima coupe is a sports car just like the 350z.mikegtr06 wrote:its not worh it on a 3.5 but..... on a 2.5 cvt, they have the same transmission and can do about the same. so........ 2.5 turbo "could" be more efficient than a 3.5 turbo. and be more "worth it" to do a turbo set up.
skiski329 wrote: i like to think the altima coupe is a sports car just like the 350z.
That's what i emailed Tim at SFR about this was his response :dangeris wrote:
According to Blake it has. He's had the transmission cooler for over 2 months now and driven it both nice and hard with no effect. I think it is resolved. The only thing that is up in the air is the same damn question I've been asking SFR but has yet to reply to...and that is, will the transmission cooler be an added cost to the aleady high $5500 turbo kit, or will this be added to the kit at no additional cost?
IMO, if you're paying that amount, it better come with EVERYTHING
being i run past 350Z'sRobPaulson wrote:
ok, you missunderstood what i said, i was saying that since hte 2.5 and 3.5 have the same trans, you could get the same amount of power out of the 2.5 cvt turbo as the 3.5 cvt turbo and be able to run more boost.skiski329 wrote: it's not worth it for a 3.5 why would you turbo a 2.5 it would cost your more than just gettin a 3.5. and a 3.5 has the vq35de same as the 350z i like to think the altima coupe is a sports car just like the 350z.
oh ok sorry about that you are right i did read that wrongmikegtr06 wrote:
ok, you missunderstood what i said, i was saying that since hte 2.5 and 3.5 have the same trans, you could get the same amount of power out of the 2.5 cvt turbo as the 3.5 cvt turbo and be able to run more boost.
someone posted that on the 3.5 cvt you couldnt get the hp/$ that you would on another turbo set up because the cvt cannont handle power. but to get the cvt to the same temp, it would require x amount of power... right
so on the 2.5 you could reach the same number hp wise as you could on the 3.5 turbo before teh cvt reaches its limit.
is that wrong ?
and then you would end up spending a couple thousand more than if you were to get a 3.5 but you have a big snail under hte hood and a little bit lighter package.
True you could match the hp, but how long will the 2.5's stock internals last before failing?mikegtr06 wrote:
ok, you missunderstood what i said, i was saying that since hte 2.5 and 3.5 have the same trans, you could get the same amount of power out of the 2.5 cvt turbo as the 3.5 cvt turbo and be able to run more boost.
someone posted that on the 3.5 cvt you couldnt get the hp/$ that you would on another turbo set up because the cvt cannont handle power. but to get the cvt to the same temp, it would require x amount of power... right
so on the 2.5 you could reach the same number hp wise as you could on the 3.5 turbo before teh cvt reaches its limit.