nwmrkt wrote:
i agree, there are way better ways to kill timeDittoz7 wrote:
I can't believe you bumped this topic back up...what was the reason for this?scottotrauma wrote:i can't believe i just read all ten pages of this
I hate to be the bearer of bad news but the gto was a RWD car.. and had an awesome powerplant.. Granted styling of it was very boring, but it performs beautifullygot_chub wrote:when a company resurrects an older car they usually destroy it in the process. look at the Malibu, impala, hummer, Monte Carlo, 300c, charger, duster(escort), bronco II, cougar or gto. all those got messed up and came out all crappy FWD yes they are all American but there are not that many jap car companies that were around before the 50 and still in existence today if they were around they didn't start coming over here till after WWII
LS engine ftw.urcaptnspeaking wrote:
I hate to be the bearer of bad news but the gto was a RWD car.. and had an awesome powerplant.. Granted styling of it was very boring, but it performs beautifully
lol i didnt even catch that post cuz i dint read half of this crapurcaptnspeaking wrote:
I hate to be the bearer of bad news but the gto was a RWD car.. and had an awesome powerplant.. Granted styling of it was very boring, but it performs beautifully
yep teh cats out of the bag......im illiterateidahotuner wrote:that is wc for you. posting without reading
Yeah like the new members "dat talk liek dis, wit some ballin chrome tailights that maik uz kool."White Comet wrote:thanks i think theres a few of us on here