Regardless of how good a driver you actually are (or percieve yourself to be), how is it relevant to any part of this discussion? Being "in touch" with a car doesn't somehow add credibility to any argument about the technical aspects of a car or the technical aspects of driving.Jacko3 wrote:So, I have been used to speed since I was a kid. I probably would have become a race car driver, but, my parents wantd me to get an education. So, I just drive cars to see what they are capable of doing. I don't do doughnuts or burn outs. I might racxe, and I only do so after taking tin to account so many other factors like the state of my tires, how my body feels and is responding, how my car is responding on that day, the way the other driver is behaving--whether they are mature, complascent, or just reckless--I can tell from the way the driver seats in the car, a littel bit about their minds set, and the risks of getting a ticket.
For me, driving is not about holding a steering wheel and stepping on the pedals. It is a lot more involved than that. For example, each steering input, dependinig on the car, requires a certain level of braking if going fast. You can't apply the brakes the same way with different steering input.
Based on this statement alone, it makes me doubt both your technical knowledge and your driving skills. First, it takes a lot of work to overheat a clutch. When a clutch is engaged, it stays engaged (assuming the engine's output doesn't exceed the clutch's torque holding capacity) until you press the clutch. Driving faster doesn't heat the clutch. Heat is introduced to a clutch when slipping occurs. This is generally highest when starting out from a stop. If driven correctly (even when racing), the process of shifting generates relatively little heat.Jacko3 wrote:Another example is when I am driving and I start smelling the clutch burning, at speeds in excess of 80 miles per hour, I hold down the clutch pedal for about a few seconds, while placing the stick in neutral. This way, you allow the clutch to dissipate heat for a few seconds before letting it go back to the fly wheel. Then, you go ahead and engage the gears again. All this is happeneing at high speeds.
Frankly, leaving the clutch engaged will likely dissipate heat faster as the heavy mass of the flywheel will absorb heat faster than the very thin layer of air that might exist between either side of the clutch disc and the flywheel and pressure plate.
Jacko3 wrote:I don't drive for luxury. I drive because it gives me much joy to know how a car behaves under different driving conditions, inputs, and mechanical conditions.
The short stint of acceleration you describe probably pales in comparison to what most magazine writers will put a car through. Many actually put the car through laps at a race track. It's doubtful you'll ever find the room to ever put a car through the type of abuse a car experiences at a race track on the street. One look at the condition of a set of tires that have been put through a number of track laps will be evidence of that.Jacko3 wrote:This is why I am always skeptical of those magazine remarks about each type of car's drining behavior. Very few of those magazine drivers drive their cars very slowly to see how it feels at slow speeds versus at high speeds. And by slowly, I mean 20 - 25 miles per hour for about 30 minutes. and then, stomp on the gas pedal to see how it behaves in instantaneous and unpredicatbale way. Of course, the tires and suspension will react to the instant request of power. And of course, you demand that power without stop until you reach a 100 miles per hour, and then you brake instantly back to 25 miles per hour and continue driving for another 30 minutes to see how the cooling system and transmission is behaving under such stresses. Manufacturers never write of this type of behavior when you buy a car. Drivers have to find this out by themselves.
