Yeah. Extenze is whack!IBCoupe wrote:I have little interest in "enhancing performance"
Yeah. Extenze is whack!IBCoupe wrote:I have little interest in "enhancing performance"
Hey, women love that you have a portable drink rest!Jesda wrote:The special part of the male anatomy that it enhanced was my gut.
So what. First... You don't own either, you ride a little motorcycle.PoorManQ45 wrote:This is "Nissan/Infiniti Car Owner Club".
Good point. You have asked your few questions about the nissan you used to have... Those few posts are over, you can leave now.PoorManQ45 wrote:The large majority of members here have only posted a few times, and that was to get help on fixing their vehicle(s).
I am here because I have a genuine interest in discussing cars, and this is a discussion forum about cars.PoorManQ45 wrote:So I would actually ask "why are you here" as you are among a handful of people that care about the performance of the vehicle while you're driving.
Small part? Entire forums dedicated to engine swaps and performance hardly constitute small. Ever look at the home page or articles? Saying that this web page does not encourage modifications is pretty ridiculous.PoorManQ45 wrote:This site mainly revolves around the sharing of information about Nissans/Infinitis, and to a smaller part, all vehicles. It does not revolve around performance modifications. That is but a very small part of the postings on this site.
That is correct. People with a large interested in doing things with their vehicles. Not just using them as an appliance.PoorManQ45 wrote:If you want to say that this is an enthusiast site, you need to look up the definition. Hell, I'll do it for you:
Enthusiast:
"1. A person who is highly interested in a particular activity or subject."
Activity or Subject. The subject here is vehicles. The activity is anything to do with vehicles.
Do you not pay any attention?Red coupe wrote: That is correct. People with a large interested in doing things with their vehicles. Not just using them as an appliance.
So we have established that this is a forum for auto enthusiasts and you say your not a part of this group.
Your not interested in the forum topic, and no one on the forum is interested in your continued posting...
So again, why are you here?
And you are dumb if you think that is true.PoorManQ45 wrote:Red coupe wrote: And yes, there are like 100k members here, you are among a VERY small percentage that care about performance.
It would be interesting to get the information from Greg.krash wrote: And you are dumb if you think that is true.
PMQ, meet a 1988 Toyota Land Cruiser.PoorManQ45 wrote: From what speed?
I have yet to be in a vehicle that didn't have sufficient passing power under 70mph...
uhm. I'm going to assume that you're ignoring all of the 240sx subforums, all of the engine specific subforums, all of the motorsports subforums, the z subforums, the skyline subforums, the g35 forum, etc etc. Sure, ignore all of that, and your right! I understand that you're not a car enthusiast, but stop pulling numbers out of the unicorn sauce to prove your point.PoorManQ45 wrote:It would be interesting to get the information from Greg.krash wrote: And you are dumb if you think that is true.
We have how many registered members? How many of them have posted even once in the last 6 months?
Active members is probably under 1k.
So that means you'd be in the 1% before you even start talking about performance related posts...
I see where he is coming from... He is retarded enough to be looking at every member who has ever joined, rather then actual members of the community.krash wrote:uhm. I'm going to assume that you're ignoring all of the 240sx subforums, all of the engine specific subforums, all of the motorsports subforums, the z subforums, the skyline subforums, the g35 forum, etc etc. Sure, ignore all of that, and your right! I understand that you're not a car enthusiast, but stop pulling numbers out of the unicorn sauce to prove your point.PoorManQ45 wrote:
It would be interesting to get the information from Greg.
We have how many registered members? How many of them have posted even once in the last 6 months?
Active members is probably under 1k.
So that means you'd be in the 1% before you even start talking about performance related posts...
So you are calling Greg and all the internet ranking sites out there retarded?Red coupe wrote: I see where he is coming from... He is retarded enough to be looking at every member who has ever joined, rather then actual members of the community.
BECAUSE THE WHOLE CONVERSATION STEMS FROM THE FACT THAT YOU CONTINUALLY POST HERE EVEN THOUGH YOU ARE NOT INTERESTED IN THE TOPIC OF THE FORUM.PoorManQ45 wrote:So you are calling Greg and all the internet ranking sites out there retarded?Red coupe wrote: I see where he is coming from... He is retarded enough to be looking at every member who has ever joined, rather then actual members of the community.
Greg likes to quote that we are xx,xxx members strong. He is quoting the total members, not active.
Why would I be retarded for doing the same thing?
Unicorn Sauce.ScorchedNX2K wrote:Unicorn Sauce?
When did I say I wasn't interesting in vehicles?Red coupe wrote: BECAUSE THE WHOLE CONVERSATION STEMS FROM THE FACT THAT YOU CONTINUALLY POST HERE EVEN THOUGH YOU ARE NOT INTERESTED IN THE TOPIC OF THE FORUM.
Because who the frak are you talking to?PoorManQ45 wrote:Greg likes to quote that we are xx,xxx members strong. He is quoting the total members, not active.
Why would I be retarded for doing the same thing?
Thank you.Red coupe wrote:You are retarded for comparing the motivations of yourself... An active member for 6 years with over 15 thousand posts, to the people who just sign up for quick help.
That's boring.PoorManQ45 wrote:To me a vehicle on the road is pretty much used to get from point A to B with minimal cost.
Driving is enjoyable and everywhere I go is useful.PoorManQ45 wrote:You guys seem to need to enjoy the ride, regardless of if you're actually going somewhere useful.
Having fun and driving dangerously are two different things.PoorManQ45 wrote:I would much prefer to take a vehicle to a track, if afforded the opportunity, to have fun then do so on public roads with other people around.
Razi wrote:Having a fun car doesn't mean you've got to speed to enjoy it.
^ This. Even more so when you lower it.wingFeather wrote:I you want enough power for fun city driving, and economy, then get a Cube. The damn things handle better than a 240 and are quick for 99% of driving on public roads.
Unless traffic is going 80PoorManQ45 wrote:Yep, 0-60 in under 8 seconds should do just fine...
Here's you some numbers:PoorManQ45 wrote:It would be interesting to get the information from Greg.
We have how many registered members? How many of them have posted even once in the last 6 months?
Active members is probably under 1k.
So that means you'd be in the 1% before you even start talking about performance related posts...
"en·thu·si·astAZhitman wrote: ...and no, you're not a "car enthusiast".
So, because our freeway/interstate systems are screwed up that justifies the need for more power?nissangirl74 wrote:Unless traffic is going 80PoorManQ45 wrote:Yep, 0-60 in under 8 seconds should do just fine...![]()
So... 1.2%...nissangirl74 wrote:Here's you some numbers:PoorManQ45 wrote:It would be interesting to get the information from Greg.
We have how many registered members? How many of them have posted even once in the last 6 months?
Active members is probably under 1k.
So that means you'd be in the 1% before you even start talking about performance related posts...
Total number of registered members: 156,914
Posts made today: 36,741
Topics created today: 3,205
Number of people who posted today: 1,901
FYI - we have over 700 articles written by members who are definitely concerned about more than getting from Point A to Point B. That number doesn't include the build threads either.
Yes. If you don't have the necessary power to merge at speed, you're gonna cause an accident.PoorManQ45 wrote:So, because our freeway/interstate systems are screwed up that justifies the need for more power?
I used to kinda wonder why PMQ got flamed all the time,but now i know.PoorManQ45 wrote:why?sx moneypit wrote:They could at least turbocharge it!
nissangirl74 wrote:Yes. If you don't have the necessary power to merge at speed, you're gonna cause an accident.PoorManQ45 wrote:So, because our freeway/interstate systems are screwed up that justifies the need for more power?
Stop being lazy, there's way worse stuff in this thread then that!sx moneypit wrote: I used to kinda wonder why PMQ got flamed all the time,but now i know.