Haha...good one (sarcasm applied)marlin29311 wrote:What's all this talk about the first halfrican american president?
LOL, have you ever *been* to DC?White Comet wrote:Fast forward to today with the inauguration coverage. All morning they've been interviewing people about what they think about it, etc, etc. EVERY single person they asked (with the exception of one older lady) were African American.
and the coin that he has is the only money to be printed without "in god we trust" on it IIRCCold_Zero wrote:I think the term that you are looking for is over exposure. They are marketing this guy (President Elect Obama) to the hilt. They have coins, dishes and DVDs (not to mention all the apparel) that they are making money off of his appeal. Not to mention all the **** that they will be selling in DC for this momentous occasion. You can't turn on the TV without seeing Obama being portrayed as a Rock Star and having Chris Matthews proclaiming that he gets a funny feeling that runs up and down his leg when the man speaks. Not to mention that his campaign has made up an "Office of the President Elect" which is no where in the US Constitution. But was created so that Barry can platy President before he is sworn in to the Official Office.All this over exposure and over marketing will be his demise in this Post Modern culture that resents these kinds of activity (over marketing).
It is not really the historical significance of the first half White and half African being elected and inaugurated to the office of the President of the United States that is the issue. It is all the distractions and everything that is being affixed to this "historic event."
In my wife's school corporation, they sent out a suggestion of websites that teachers can use to create curriculum to teach on this historic event. Yet when Tony Dungy was the first Black Head Coach in the NFL to win the Super Bowl, her school corporation was silent. What the travesty is that IMHO Tony Dungy is more of a role model that I would want my daughter to strive to be more like than any President of the United States, Obama included.
The fact that Obama is a successful black man is not the 'big deal'.Jesda wrote:A lot of Americans think its REALLY AMAZING that a black man can succeed at something besides rapping or playing basketball. I feel sorry for those people, the morons with tunnel vision who think a black president is the most shocking and amazing thing to ever happen.
Brilliant.White Comet wrote: I don't remember news coverage the first time a Chinese guy rode on a train or something else equally retarded to point out
Brilliant.Jesda wrote: The nonsense will wear off in a week and the new president can get down to business.
Brilliant.Cold_Zero wrote: What the travesty is that IMHO Tony Dungy is more of a role model that I would want my daughter to strive to be more like than any President of the United States, Obama included.
....aaaand brilliant.Cold_Zero wrote: What Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. fought for transcends politics and should not be high jacked for the latest, greatest event, especially for one person's benefit.
You don't think America being willing to elect a black man to the presidency isn't at all a reflection of MLKJ's work?Cold_Zero wrote:It should also be noted, especially since everyone (National News Media and the Obama Handlers) were affixing the election and inauguration of Obama to the Dr Martin Luther King Jr legacy (because of the Holiday).
While one person may share similarities with Adolf Hitler, Obama is by no means just like Adolf Hitler...sileighty_stev0n wrote:obama seems to me like possibly the most convincing 'salesman' ever.
He's very articulate, well educated, and has the ability to get the masses to back him with an extreme passion (reminds me of adolf hitler).
what worries me is the possibility that he is just that, a talker. and since he has now talked his way into office, when it comes time to act - he will fall short. But we will see.
No, but that is not what King's legacy is all about (getting a black man elected to the position of the Presidency of the United States). To sell it short by affixing it to the Presidency of one man, sells it short. Again, the work that King did transcends all this.JimmyMethod wrote:
You don't think America being willing to elect a black man to the presidency isn't at all a reflection of MLKJ's work?
i completely agree, but I'm worried that Obama was voted in BECAUSE he's black and not his political stance. If i white candidate had the exact same political stance woudl he be as widely received by the African American community? There's no 2 ways about it that obama had many black supporters. You can't tell me the entire black community agree with his viewpoints. I'm sure many backed him because of his skin color. As positive and ground breaking as it is to have a black president, I fell that many would have voted for ANY black candidate and not Obama. I almost feel that he's the token black guy and thats all it took for some to vote him in. I'm willing to bet that some who voted for him couldn't tell you his position on certain issuesJimmyMethod wrote:The 'big deal' having to do with our president being black, is that it is an indication that our society can put aside old prejudices and put aside the scars of the past to elect a man who, to many, sits as a reminder of those wounds.
The media will probably still blame Bush, saying that it was his fault in the first place. This will probably happen for the next 4 year or so I would imagine.bobotech wrote:I wonder about this, we have built up Barry so much over the last year, what will happen when everyone's normal day to day life do NOT change or change for the worse (economy still crashing)?
Its one thing for Bush to fail, everyone expects it so when he screws up, its just Bush as usual. But if Barry screws up or rather say Barry doesn't make impressionable changes that the average Joe the plumber can see, what will happen to him?
Um... I'm pretty sure most if not every civil rights triumph in the last 50 years could be shown to be owing to MLKJ's legacy...Cold_Zero wrote:No, but that is not what King's legacy is all about (getting a black man elected to the position of the Presidency of the United States). To sell it short by affixing it to the Presidency of one man, sells it short. Again, the work that King did transcends all this.
Hmmmm.JimmyMethod wrote:they all think that electing Barack Obama is an indication that we really aren't a bunch of racist xenophobes, which is their stereotype of us.
Who is this monolithic 'they'?Cold_Zero wrote:Even though they did not blame Clinton for the Recession and the Al Qaeda threat that Bush inherited.
Most of these people had spend a lot of time in the U.S. and know that it's just a stereotype, but collective feelings vs. individual's feelings are different (groupthink, yo).AZhitman wrote:If they're ignorant enough to perceive the whole population of the US as "racist xenophobes", then I'd also take their opinion of The Barry with a big chunk of rock salt.
Now you are catching on, Jimmy.JimmyMethod wrote:If you are just trying to be difficult/obstinate, fine.
I would find sweet Irony if in your travel stories you are referring to Europe. The majority of Europe is down right xenophobic towards all the immigrating groups from North Africa, Sub Saharan Africa and the Middle East. I would take sweet sweet pleasure in being called a racist xenophobe by the Europeans.JimmyMethod wrote:Anyway,I recently spent some time outside the U.S. and talking to people in various countries, and they all think that electing Barack Obama is an indication that we really aren't a bunch of racist xenophobes, which is their stereotype of us.