JimmyMethod wrote: I'll give you that a skilled tradesperson can pull in a lot of money, (I knew an underwater welder who, after 10 years,m moved to the nice part of St. Thomas) but in what way are they actually innovating? They are just following directions.
Think of this skilled person to be a PHD in his specific field. Now, lets say this person sees a problem with the common methodology used to to X task(this is just one small example of how ANYONE can contribute to society[in your lame brained way of thinking about how people contribute to society]). He comes up with a new method that is widely accepted as the best way of doing things, thus he has become an innovator, inventor, and contributed to society(again, in your 'special' way).
JimmyMethod wrote: THAT'S the part I found to be humorous... I really can't stop laughing at that...
It was meant to be partially a joke. However, discount said individuals contribution to society.
JimmyMethod wrote:my opinion of 'Les Ecrivans' has diminished with the fact that society no longer relies on books for it's entertainment. We as a people read so little that a writer, while potentially 'good', really has no effect on the populace.
The populace of today Jimmy. Dont forget about the last 2000 years. Its only in the last 10-15 years that this big shift has been made away from conventional entertainment to television, vid games and the internet. There will most likely be a rebound eventually.
In addition, there will always be intellectuals who read books and poetry. I still read both. Some of society is not entertained by television or Hollywood exclusively. Some arnt entertained by either.
JimmyMethod wrote: ... part of me wants to say that if a gunman came into MaccyD's and started shooting, he'd be more of a force for good than the person who stopped him.
The ignorant bigot wanabe elitist part? I think i give you to much credit.....
JimmyMethod wrote:
...because I have a global perspective on higher education, and can compare our antiquated system of only supplying it to the wealthy to that of other civilized countries that supply it to all, you think I grew up in a cave?
-24000 average annual tuition paid for a stateside 4 year.
-15000 average annual tuition paid for a British 4 year.
-17000 average annual tuition paid for a Ireland 4 year.
-8000 average annual tuition paid for a Australian 4 year.
-Europe is much more affordable, but they pay such high taxes so it balances itself out. About 1300 dollars per year.
-Germany has an awesome higher education policy, 1000 euros where ever you go regardless of where your from.
-China? Who knows, it was a void to google.
-Japan has a dictatorship style of education. If you fail a test, your out. If you pass, your in like flint.
-India is cheap.
-France sucks.
-The rest of the world.... Heres where that nice doctrine falls apart. Africa, Southern America, Mexico, just to name a few.
So your right to a degree, American degrees are pretty much the most expensive in the globe. HOWEVER.... Its pretty much a known world fact that the best universities in the globe are in America. The best, highest paid, most renowned teachers come here because of our 'capitalist' system of government.
So i could say, you get what your pay for.
Also, its called student loans. You may have never heard of these, but a a vast majority of people use them and get a very nice education without having it spoon feed to them.
In addition, i would LOVE to know what kind of global experience you have with foreign education systems. Please tell.
JimmyMethod wrote:I will admit to being the child of a Ph.D and M.D. and the grandchild of the owners/founders of a fairly successful aluminum extrusion and anodizing company.
I already knew where you came from, it oozes out of you in your posts. It would have just been cooler if you had been raised in a cave.
JimmyMethod wrote: However, how does that exclude me from saying that I think education should be provided to not just the wealthy?
Your all over the place with your 'arguments'.
JimmyMethod wrote:Your logic is backwards. Maybe if I was saying we should hike up the price so no one else can go you bitching about me being from a wealthy family would make sense.
Yea.. makes... sense.... Relevance..? Along with a few other things....
JimmyMethod wrote: The UN didn't 'implement' it, member nations set out to accomplish it on their own, and succeeded. Education is cheap pretty much everywhere of note, but here.
I never said the UN implemented it.. It was a doctrine that was written in 66 with the ideas, as you said, that it would be implemented on its own. Self implemented by the countries inside the UN. The whole idea behind the writing of this thing was to see it implemented, i suppose my terminology when i spoke of this was misleading.
Some member nations succeeded, most did not. Education is not cheap and readily available everywhere else. Cheaper than here, yes.
JimmyMethod wrote: It's 'laughable' how little you know about the world/what I'm saying. This isn't some lofty future goal... It's been going on for decades.
It has been progressing, but it is still a lofty future goal. To think otherwise is to ignore over 50 percent of the globe.
JimmyMethod wrote: This is exactly my point, you fail at even understanding global culture, let alone contributing to it.
What your saying is mostly crap, so im glad i dont know much about it. Knowledge has spawned out of some of the crap you have posted through my own independent research, you can take credit for that if you like.
Oh, please tell me how you understand even a substantial fragment of global culture and contribute accordingly at the age of 22 while your still in college?
JimmyMethod wrote: ... why would Europe need to start another society?
Because it could be a Utopian society, where only the Einsteins, the Darwins, the Froyds, Shakespeares, Beethovens and Jimmy were allowed in. Cant you picture it Jimmy? You would never have to see another McDonnalds in your life. You would never have to look down your nose at a construction worker or plumber. You could be rid of all of the people who contribute nothing to society, so no one could hold you back. Think of what Jimmy could do!
JimmyMethod wrote: ...Again, I say that 'making a bunch of money' doesn't make you a productive member of society. If the inventor of the 'pet rock' was never born, the world would be no worse, and perhaps a better place.
Your argument goes all over the place, again. You jump from contributing to society, to making money, then back to contributing to society as if you yourself didnt bring those subjects up.
JimmyMethod wrote: This is the internet, and I'm quite sick.
Good for you Jimmy.
JimmyMethod wrote:I just find it hilarious that you decided to ridicule my grammar with such an atrocious paragraph.
The paragraph was sound. Apostrophes have no place in the internet, there simply isnt the time for them anymore. Your is a commonly used replacement now for you're. At least in my head it is..
JimmyMethod wrote: I've seen you fall back on ad hominem and argumentum ad populum. I'm waiting for something of value.
Ahh Jimmy Jimmy... Bringing up fallacies in latin that i may have made through out my many arguments. If you want to make a point, you need to be specific. Point out these specific fallacies please, or that comment is completely useless. You see Jimmy, fallacies are very tricky for most people and require a great deal of scrutiny to discern if a true fallacious argument has been made. Simply because you say that i have committed such fallacies does not make it so.
You have no authority here, so get over yourself kid. No, i didnt need a comma there either.
EDIT - ROTFLMAO at BB's flagrancy raking system. They even have matching glasses, isnt that cute?