Kompresshun wrote:Good MoD is here. Give me your thoughts on the CTS Wagon with the 3.6L in it, because I know you love the LFX.
The CTS-V is the manly way to go, but I probably shouldn't have 556hp at my disposal for hauling my kid around and commuting to work.
Brian - You're making me want to pick up an old land yacht estate wagon and turbo the holy f*** out of it.
Yeah, as much as I may be a power-hungry hoon and a V8 elitist, the LFX and LF3 have sure gone a long way toward convincing me that I could happily "settle" for a V6.
Supposedly, the LFX doesn't suffer from the timing chain problems that plagued the LLT. LLT was also known for oil consumption in some cases (not on a QR25 scale, but still more than acceptable) but I think LFX fixed those as well.
I think the 3.6 wagon is a great choice. Just keep in mind that only 2012 and later models get LFX. Earlier had the LLT. Still a great engine performance-wise, but not the most reliable on earth.
What I love about the GM HFV6 is that it's seriously refined. Moreso than any other V6 I've driven. It's very smooth, it doesn't sound gravelly or coarse, it doesn't drone, and and it's responsive. It ALMOST feels like an early-90s American V8, except that even the LFX can't mask the natural imbalance of the V6 layout completely. I can see why GM decided that it was an okay alternative to the Northstar in most cases (especially with boost added) since only ultra-V8-whores like me will really care about the difference.
I sure as Hell wouldn't complain about getting to drive an LFX CTS Wagon. The big downside: V6 wagons didn't get the third pedal; only the V Wagon got a row-your-own option.