Yes sir,plus the bonus of a little more torque and horsepower.elwesso wrote:So is overall that powertrain with the 6MT a reliable setup like the 3.5L
I sort of disagree with that, although it depends what you want. My major stipulation it something 20k or under, reliable, sporty, RWD, and manual trans. There are very few options that meet that criteria, and IMO the G37 is the best bang for the buck. Other than the G, you're basically looking at Audi, BMW, VW, a couple MBs, and the CTS-V. Audi and VW don't exactly take the cake for reliability, and BMW can be a little hit and miss depending on what you're getting.Kompresshun wrote:I think you'll be happy with the G37 sedan Wes. Honestly I think you'd even be fine with a 2nd gen G35 sedan because they improved the oil consumption in those too. I've driven a few of them and have always liked them. The only reason I never have gotten one is they just never really have done a whole lot for me for how much they cost.
If I end up with another sedan i'd probably go for something more interesting like a BMW or a turbo Volvo, just for the sake of how little I drive my car anyways. The first year I had it, I racked up 20k. The second year - 9,000. I pretty much just drive it on the days Bethany has to go to daycare and when there's a lot of snow and ice on the ground.
I think he's wanting a sedan. Also, no offense but who would buy an F-Body when they already have a BMW Z4 and have owned a CTS-V? That's pretty much junk in comparisonfrapjap wrote:How about a Volvo C30? Its not RWD, but is a very fun, competent car. Handles well, has a great transmission, the T5 turbo is damned near bulletproof.
You could always go Camaro SS or 4th gen F body, too.
Agreed, that is a fantastic looking car!Kompresshun wrote:
If I were in the market for another convertible, a Sky Redline would definitely be on my list right below a Miata. 260hp in the base Redline is just plain awesome. Plus a LS1 just happens to fit right down in one too.
See for me the reliability wouldn't be a major issue either. As long as i'm fully aware of what I may have to face before buying one, I think i'd be fine with dealing with it. I seriously may take a look at them when it's time to replace the 500, because I think I would thoroughly enjoy owning one.elwesso wrote:The 335 is a fantastic car, and you can get those in AWD if you wanted as well. I drove a 335 when they came out and really liked it. Turns out they're not the most reliable with high pressure fuel pump issues, fuel injectors, and turbo/wastegate issues. IMO turbo issues just mean you get to upgrade the turbo to something bigger!!Back in 2006, the G35 was about 20k cheaper than the 335, and I felt like while overall I liked the 335i better, I'd save myself 20k and get the G35. In other words, I didn't like the 335i $20k better...
BTW, my girlfriend has a 2008 Ford Taurus, and if you would have asked me this before I drove it I would have bet $1000 I'd never be saying this, but...... That car is fantastic. The back seat is very spacious, trunk is cavernous, it's got plenty of power especially with the 6 speed auto, and it's epically smooth and quiet cruising on the road, and it gets great gas mileage for a car that size. For a daily driver, that car is great. I dare say I'd rather have that than an Altima or Maxima for daily driving...
Her car has about 135k on it and still runs great. This past weekend we went and looked at some new cars, so when she's ready to get rid of the Taurus in a year or 2 she'll know what she wants. From what we've seen, there's almost nothing that does everything as good as her Taurus.
I do love the LGT - they're fantastic looking cars. I do shy away from them for the sake of head gasket issues, but honestly that's probably the worst issue you'd ever have.elwesso wrote:Legacy GT is a consideration... My friend had a legacy GT limited and I was surprised by how nice that car is.
G8- For less money you get a better looking and nicer interior with the CTS-V. They're basically the same idea in terms of what they are.
I don't think those other ones come in Sedan and Manual trans?
I think the CL comes as a manual, and maybe the Magnum & Charger.elwesso wrote:Legacy GT is a consideration... My friend had a legacy GT limited and I was surprised by how nice that car is.
G8- For less money you get a better looking and nicer interior with the CTS-V. They're basically the same idea in terms of what they are.
I don't think those other ones come in Sedan and Manual trans?
I really think I need a sedan, or something slightly bigger. I take 1-2 road trips per year, plus I just like having space for 4 people to fit reasonably comfortable and whatnot. I'd consider a small SUV, so long as it gets about 25MPG.XenonSE-R wrote:Wes - is your requirement a sedan and RWD with a stick? Or you good with RWD/MT and not partial to a sedan?
WOW! Those G's took hard depreciation hits. Good for you, bad for the PO! I'd have a hard time arguing against that logic, too. But- the AWD doesn't come with a manual transmission, right? Thats about the only downer if you want AWD in the G.elwesso wrote:Wow that is a lot nicer that I expected. The only issue I have is this:
http://www.autotrader.com/cars-for-sale ... 4009&Log=0
For basically the same money, you get something that's 5 years newer, better MPG, arguably nicer interior, arguably looks better, and is already about 1 second faster in the 1/4 mile than the Subaru.
Now, if I could get those 2007ish Spec B's for 8-10k instead of 14-17k, then we might have something.
Just a suggestion, but I heavily considered one of these before we got the KIA: http://www.cars.com/go/search/detail.js ... listType=1elwesso wrote:I'd consider a small SUV, so long as it gets about 25MPG