thats exactly what i was told about the sway bars, use stocker in the rear and upgrade the front to increase traction for hard cornering. Right now im not to the point where i want to do that with y car yet because i really enjoy the way i can make my car rotate and keep it under control and higher speeds on track. For auto-x i have no experience, so you may havce to consult others for that portion. offset, i have no idea as well, S14 not my department, loko around on wheel threads to see what others are running, then work from there....corey240 wrote:this thread is awsome. now im not throwing your woods around to make a different thing but. the way i understand what you said, if i put stock sway bar on the rear with my whiteline in front it would help? i mean this as in it would help keep traction say in autocross? im just trying to totaly understand this. i read all thes threads from nico -fa-sr20club and it all confuses me but what you said i got the idea of what you were saying and it makes sense to me. i cant stand how technical people make things sound when a noob asks a question. after reading it 10 more times il understand offset, so whats a good offset on an s14
The 240sx has a nasty habit of picking up an inside rear tire. This is a definite no-no if you want to plant any power coming out of a turn. In order to run a rear sway, you'd pretty much need a custom bar up front. I had a whiteline sway up front on mine (heim endlinks) with a stock rear and it was pretty horrible. More grip = more roll, more roll resistance = picking up tires.sr20goofus wrote:i gathered from older ITA racers that larger front sway with stock rear, or stock front and no rear is the way to go.....dont stiffen up everything too much or the car wont grip on corner exit acceleration.
I've noticed the "picking up an inside rear tire" deal.AceInhole wrote:The 240sx has a nasty habit of picking up an inside rear tire. This is a definite no-no if you want to plant any power coming out of a turn. In order to run a rear sway, you'd pretty much need a custom bar up front. I had a whiteline sway up front on mine (heim endlinks) with a stock rear and it was pretty horrible. More grip = more roll, more roll resistance = picking up tires.
I dont understand what you mean by needing a custom bar upfront. Can you please explain?AceInhole wrote:In order to run a rear sway, you'd pretty much need a custom bar up front.
Thats a very interesting piece indeed. But again , can you explain something to me?....AceInhole wrote:What I mean is a custom swaybar. I'm not sure that any of the off-the-shelf bars were ever really meant to go on cars that see lateral forces over 1.0G....
Here's an example of what you might find on a road-racing car:
Do you mean that the off-the-shelf bars are incapable of being stiff enough to produce that much lateral G's , or if they seen that much lateral G's they would snap or bend??AceInhole wrote:I'm not sure that any of the off-the-shelf bars were ever really meant to go on cars that see lateral forces over 1.0G....
The following is what I've gathered from experience, and applying basic suspension theory to it. I may, of course, be incorrect in my assessment, but it seems to work for a bunch of successful racers:Slappy wrote:Do you mean that the off-the-shelf bars are incapable of being stiff enough to produce that much lateral G's , or if they seen that much lateral G's they would snap or bend??
Those bars seem to be pretty common in racing, so I'm sure any shop that does custom suspension work will be able to make one. An example of one of the shops near me is:http://www.smallfortuneracing.....htmln00b240 wrote:Thats a serious bar up there. I'd be interested in more about that bar. Info's/Links/ Custom Fab
Ok , so , what your saying here is stiffer in the front is better? Or am i reading that wrong?AceInhole wrote:as you increase the grip limits/ lateral handling capabilities of a 240sx, biasing more roll resistance to the front is beneficial for performance.
That is what I got out of it.Slappy wrote:
Ok , so , what your saying here is stiffer in the front is better? Or am i reading that wrong?
http://www.1speedway.com/608_175bars.htmn00b240 wrote:Thats a serious bar up there. I'd be interested in more about that bar. Info's/Links/ Custom Fab
Well , from reading you and AceInhole's post , im starting to think the rear of my car is overly stiff for any type of serious grip racing. My car oversteers like crazy and even when i rev match and try to correct it ect. , it still doesnt want to "put the power down" enough to ever be able to pull any serious lap times. Thanks for all the input guys.cracker wrote:
That is what I got out of it.
FWIW:Running a (VERY) large front bar, and no to oem rear bar on miata's is a very common practice
If I am not mistaken, running no rear bar free's the rear tires to move independent of each other in a corning state, with a bar attached, one tire has more or less grip than the other, due to the roll resistance of the bar "picking one wheel up", to compensate for the body roll. The benefit is you retain more grip (in theory) to both drive wheels. this is of course assuming you have enough roll resistance in the rest of the car (and rear springs/dampning) to keep the body roll to a minimum. But I also might not have any idea of how it actually works. This is an educated guess based off of my limited suspension knowledge, in other words; take it for what its worth.
With a blade-link swaybar, you pretty much isolate the bar in torsion. The large center bar basically twists to provide roll resistance. Factory swaybars have both twisting and bending through the multiple bends present in the bar.a_ahmed wrote:I was hyped of getting a largus front and pillowball endlinks... but... this seems quite hardcore... what i am wondering though is how does it work.
Now I know that a shorter the bar, the more stiff it is, the longer, the less stiff it is... but.. how exactly does this type of bar 'bend' or absorb the tension.. im just curious... it seems pretty much well.. straight... how does it even get mounted exactly (i wasnt quite clear from the pic if it was hanging or welded in some way to the chassis...)
only thing i can visualize in my head is that tohse side bars bend/move while the center bar keeps them tied together.. and thats what then acts as a swaybar.... am i making sense?...
There is a kit for the miata, retails for 485.00 or something just short of 500.00I talked to a local guy who had one made by a local race shop for his Colorado, he said it was right around 500.00 for his, He also has one for his s2k, but he didn't say how much it was, I assume it is in that same range.I am thinking of going this route instead of the racing beat hollow bar, all I have to do is justify spending twice as much for a one-off than for the OTS.AceInhole wrote:I'm not sure how much it'd cost, but I'd expect to pay between $400 - $600 for a one-off bar. It might be more if they actually charge time in developing it.
An easy way to check it is, next time you are at an event, unhook one end link from the chassis. If I am not mistaken, this will keep the bar from being able to provide any roll resistance. I have never done this though, I just pulled the whole bar. You might unhook both endlinks, the more I think about it.Slappy wrote:
Well , from reading you and AceInhole's post , im starting to think the rear of my car is overly stiff for any type of serious grip racing. My car oversteers like crazy and even when i rev match and try to correct it ect. , it still doesnt want to "put the power down" enough to ever be able to pull any serious lap times. Thanks for all the input guys.
Ok , thank you.cracker wrote:
An easy way to check it is, next time you are at an event, unhook one end link from the chassis. If I am not mistaken, this will keep the bar from being able to provide any roll resistance. I have never done this though, I just pulled the whole bar. You might unhook both endlinks, the more I think about it.
It's free and easy to check.
Modified by cracker at 9:19 AM 11/6/2007
You generally don't hear it, because most guys find out early enough to lose the rear bar :Psr20goofus wrote:I havnt ever heard of a 240 lifting a rear wheel on road courses, in any race series, and if it was happening im sure its because they were running rediculous spring rates and dampners combined with 1" sway bars that werent allowing enough droop of the inside wheel.
i know if you run a suspension that does not allow alot of actual travel in the rear suspension then i can see how the rear would unload. If the suspension could open up a bit more, maybe it would be less of a problem, in Auto-x your also putting the car into harsher turns, but at much lower speeds than road racing.AceInhole wrote:My car is an autox car and is admittedly sprung to not run a rear bar. I tried running with the stock rear and a heimed whiteline up front and still had major problems with the inside rear unloading. Those problems are pretty much gone with the removal of the rear bar. I still unload it on tighter stuff, but hoping some tender springs fix that.
Anyways, I randomly got a message from Jeff at 240sxMotoring.com, something like "no rear bar is awesome". I had told him to try running his time attack car without the rear like a month before.
I am no engineer --and a lousy mechanic--but had been running my S13 at Autocrosses with a Whiteline front bar and the rear Whiteline rear bar disconnected. --It "felt" better but I am not sure it was better.sr20goofus wrote:
i had planned to try the no bar idea at my last 2 track events in august and october, but i was just too busy to slid myself under the car to pull it off while at the track. I know the combination of stiff front and soft rear works well with 240's as far as swaybars go, but at point dont you think the front might be getting too stiff or too over-engineered?