whtsmypaswrd wrote: From what I've read about CVT sucking gas, I suspect I'm either magic or I may have something to worry about.
Nothing to worry about. Most (not all) of us that complain spend a lot of time in true "stop and go" or deal with lots of traffic lights and stop signs. Thanks to a couple of long trips I'm averaging a little over 28; otherwise I'd be in the 26 mpg range because my Versa rarely gets up on the freeway. I took a 4,500 mile trip to Florida and back earlier this year and averaged 32.9 round trip, dealing with high winds most of the way. I've made the same trip in other cars and felt that the Versa didn't do as well as it should have.
The new Versa mpg sticker from the EPA is much more accurate. When I bought mine it was rated 30 around town, 36 on the highway. It was rated in line with other economy cars we were considering so then we moved on to the amenities for the price and bought the Versa. It was after we bought the car that the mileage estimate was revised downward. And now, in real-life reporting, other cars we were considering are delivering better than revised sticker average under the new testing while the Versa is right on the new sticker average.
Compared to the vast majority of the cars out there, our references to "sucking gas" aren't accurate. The Versa delivers better mpg than most cars. It's delivering great mileage for some, o.k. for others, but disappointing for people like me who expected more out of the car based on almost 40 years of experience and between 45-50 cars I've either owned or rented. My gas mileage is about 10% less than expected.
If the Versa gets to spend a decent amount of time actually moving down the road, not dealing with lights and stop signs, it should give you good mpg consistently. It's all about expectations and perceptions.