nlzmo400r wrote:we already got it all cleared up, but thanks for your input nismodrift
HAHAHA... I guess thats what i get for my slow azz AOL. I swear all those posts werent there when i replied, really.
There is no A22, the motor that was used in the 3rd gen accord was the b20 (2 liter) the 4th and 5th gen accords use an F22 series motor, 1st and 2nd gen uses the older es2 and es3 carbuerated engines.J-Spec Tuner wrote:the A22 i belive is another one, at least i think thats whats in US 3rd gen accords.
nlzmo400r wrote:i am unaware of any use of a 'b22', the only 2.2 liter that i know of that honda has made in recent years is the h22, the euro accord R got 216hp @ 72oorpm and 162.74ft lbs of tq at 67oorpm, which is very close to hte h22's power figures (assuming they added a lil power for the 'R' factor) , this motor is also 2156cc (2.2liters), and was a 4dr, which i never understood
musicsurfman wrote:SO WHAT SI GOT THE 2.2L WITH 220HP. I KNOW ITS A B22. I THOUGHT IT WAS THE PRELUDE. OHH WELL I GOT THE CARS WRONG BUT I KNOW I GOT THE ENGINES RIGHT. THE CARS SUCK ANYWAY ITS THE POWERPLANT THAT I WANT.
TomsMR2 wrote:hondas suck.. really.
its all about torque curves. theres so much fapping over the NSX, which also sucks. the z06 spanks the nsx is every way possbile, even in the infamous TwIsTiEzzzz.
toyota/dsm have been making 100hp/L motors with WAY broader curves before honda even had a b16a. hondas suck, and im not saying that because im some anti-honda nazi.. its because they actually suck.
sure, you can make them run 10's. drop enough money fixing everythign wrong with any engine and it'll run 10's. fast hondas are FAR from stock. strap a cheapass $1K turbo on your KA, and a 1K turbo on a b16a and see which is faster. hondas were never made to go fast. they were made to get great gas mileage thru technology and lightweight.
everyones now ****ting their pants because the RSX is getting like 250hp and 170tq at the wheels na.. oh wow! nissan/dsm/toyota 2.0L motors can break 300/300, usually on stock internals.
so honda can pull 100hp/L na.. everyone else has been making more hp/L and tq/L with broader curves since the 90's with turbos.
honda sucks and deserves no respect. its the geo metro of the compact car performance world.
NiSilS14 wrote:you people seem to know a lot more about hondas than i do. my friend has a B20 and wants to make it Vtec and he told me that he can fit a B18 Head on it. i said why not just get the whole B18 engine. but anyway is it possible to do that?
nlzmo400r wrote:yea its possible, with boring of the head of course, hondas are easily modifiable, and all being 'B' series motors, tehy can make countless hybrids out of them
nlzmo400r wrote:i dont think there was a h23, im sure there was only the h22, which had 2oohp, as a matter of fact, i drove one yestderday, had no poewr until u hit vtec
ooo, so i was wrong, thanks for the correct info, sorry for the false information guys, and i know about the b2o's torque, because it comes out of a crv, but i didnt know the b16 head would 'bolt on' to the b2o block, and why would honda make the h23 with no vtec for usdm with 16ohp and 2oohp for japanese (did they get a vtec head?)SloMoe wrote:The H23a came in the 92-96 preludes the USDM h23 (DOHC non-vtec) had 160hp crank horsepower and the JDM H23 had 200HP the USDM H22a (DOHC Vtec) has 200HP
89240sx wrote:blah blah blah ...who cares ... they are still slow no matter what and my point was ... why are we wasting NICO space on a Honda discussion?