I meant breaking in the clutch.WDRacing wrote:I'm sure you're not retarded when it comes to braking in the motor. But My only suggestion is to have the motor pull lots of vacuum while driving the first 50 miles or so. Like motor braking in 2nd for a little bit etc. AND never lug the motor during brake in...again, you probably know all this, I just have to add my .02
WD
The squat transfer the sudden shock form the drive train into down force inertia on the rear end instead of it staying in the drive train and breaking the tires loose. If squat is no good for drag racing then why do the world record turbo drag cars all squat on launch. The Titan supra, AMS Evo, or Ivan's 9 sec KAT. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QdQFV-gz ... iULZm4rH2oGODCHSR wrote:but you are way off base in assuming that "squat" is good for drag.
Assuming you weren't able to get the tires to hook the squat characteristics would be more ideal
The first thing to note is that it is natural for the car to want to squat because of energy transfer.spank044 wrote:
The squat transfer the sudden shock form the drive train into down force inertia on the rear end instead of it staying in the drive train and breaking the tires loose. If squat is no good for drag racing then why do the world record turbo drag cars all squat on launch. The Titan supra, AMS Evo, or Ivan's 9 sec KAT. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QdQFV-gz ... iULZm4rH2o
I assume you were talking to Spank because I said:WDRacing wrote:Ivans car has almost no squat dude.
Godchsr wrote:The squatting you gave in example is minimal imo.
I'm not suggesting squat is 'bad'. I am suggesting it's not optimal to have excessive squat. and if Anti-Squat can be achieved I believe that to be optimal in reducing power loss.WDRacing wrote:...Squat is not a bad thing for drag racing, simple physics explains weight transfer etc. But not all cars have a lot of squat on the launch. I define squat as by a good bit of dip in the rear end, not just a slight dip that basically can't be tuned out, there is just to much weight transfer.
My car will squat
I have no idea of it's potential. Is the Convertor the weak link in the Auto?WDRacing wrote:So...
I SERIOUSLY just want to go automatic. If I had the money to bolt up a TH400 I'd be ALL over it. Sadly, I do not have the funds for that.
I wonder how much power the KA slushbox would hold if I had Precision Industries rebuild the converter? Any guesses? Assuming that the only time it would see nitrous or more boost then 10 psi would be on the track. Also, KA auto's are literally lying around everywhere. I could probably get 4-5 donated to the cause from just Nico members alone I have one just sitting in my yard under a tarp
Mike Canter of OutLaw Pro Mod:"The rear of the car with this added weight transferred from the rising front will lift very little but it should not go down (squat). An inch or two is normal and can be best seen by looking at the relationship between the top of the slicks and the rear fender lip. This one or two inches of rise will indicate that the rear of the car is lifting and pushing harder on the tires while the front weight is being transferred (for every motion there is an equal and opposite motion).If the front of the car does not rise first then the front shocks are too stiff or the rear shocks are not stiff enough.If the rear of the car squats right away then the rear shocks are too loose."spank044 wrote:
The squat transfer the sudden shock form the drive train into down force inertia on the rear end instead of it staying in the drive train and breaking the tires loose... blah blah blah
Freebeer and Hotwings fan huh?WDRacing wrote:It's all minutia really bro...