The Bose sounds fine as long as you ignore door rattles. It may not pop the welds in your trunk but then it isn't simply a large boom box.lucidd wrote:Ok... . on the BoSe system on their G's or... the new Acura/Panasonic ELS sound systems?Thx. L
I bet if you actually test this out you would fine it is actually pretty accurate, but not what many really want. The one thing I find it lacks a little bit (and my hearing lacks this as well) is on the highs. The bass is fine but not 1 gigawatt like many who drive around with the license plate rattling expect. The mid-range are right on and the treble is probably ok but I have to run it up in order to make it sound like I want it to sound and it doesn't allow enough latitude to overcome the one place I want a little boost.lucidd wrote:Agreed- this bOSe system will not pop your welds- not what I'm looking for anyways.
Andit does sound like a large boom box- sometimes worse.
I'm just looking for sound clarity. The Bose doesn't have that... Most music is produced with a muddy midrange, and the lack of high freq. Bass is ok but heard better. L
The best way is to test it with a test disk if you want to know if it is accurate or not. The problem with listening to songs you know is where you know them from. Why some find certain systems 'muddy' is often because they are flat with few peaks. Regardless of the system nearly all listeners will boost the bass, the treble or both. Technical reviewers will often find the Infiniti Bose sounds better than the Lexus Mark Levinson while the car owners tend to go for the grass is greener on the other side.lucidd wrote:Guess I'd make more sense in an sound forum... Does this bose system sound good with certain songs? -yes. But is it great? NO. And does sound -"sound"- different to the next person?-yes.
... a good way to find out what you have in your car - our cars, is to go do a comparison test.
It's like a test drive - chose a route [like Jacko's secret track] ... then take your car on it, then take a GTR [if you find one... but just an example].
Take a cd - list of songs that you are familiar with - maybe some favorites and then listen to your system... then listen to another with the same cd.Compare to lets say a: BMW 3series Harman Kardon, or Lexus Mark/Levinson, or Audi's B&O, or Acura's ELS, or a aftermarket alpine show car-something different.And compare - objectively... diff volumes, settings, songs... You'd be surprised at what you'd find.
IMO-The Bose/Infiniti Studio on Wheels system is just as loud... or even louder... BUT nowhere close to the above mentioned sytems - in *sound clarity. ... U'll only know what I mean if you did a comparison test. L
PS. I still do have my 07 G35. Just a fair comparison to what's out there is in turn when getting a new / second car
You should be listening to it from the inside, no wonder it sounds muddy to some.Sentientbydesign wrote:I defended Bose systems for years because the system in my 96 I30 was superb. I'd actually go to my car to listen to music because nothing in the house could compare.
Then a bad bad thing happened. The notorious Clarion Head Unit died. So I got another one in better condition from a 97 and had it repaired. My CDs never sounded as good after that.
So, I think that the Head Unit might be to blame, but I will say that I wouldn't dare touch a premium package because I think the Bose in the G sounds like poop flushing in a toilet when heard from outside during a thunderstorm.
The base audio sucks just as bad
Great idea! Actually, I'd like to see modular designs throughout the industry.pfarmer wrote:
You should be listening to it from the inside, no wonder it sounds muddy to some.
Seriously I wish all cars were sold without a sound system. It will have an interface for system sounds and you would connect all in a similar fashion to what you do with a home rack mounted system. You go to the dealer, you pick the sound system of your choice, the speakers, amp, whatever and then it is professionally installed. The sound system would provide an industry standard video output for display. Hmm... just like the good old days right between the vehicle specific units when the norms were basically din or double din only how we view what is occurring is different.
Perry
Not really a new idea since this was the norm for early 'premium cars'.Sentientbydesign wrote:
Great idea! Actually, I'd like to see modular designs throughout the industry.
For instance...I love the new Camaro body design, but I don't want to touch the rest of the car. Imagine purchasing a chassis from one manufacturer, drivetrain from another, interior from another.
And before any nay-sayers come up with "what about engine fitment" standardisation could fix every problem posed.
Just think:
Japanese ElectronicsItalian InteriorJapanese WheelsGerman styling?
And how did you measure this, hopefully not by listening.lucidd wrote:I totally agree. I've used a sine wave from 20hz-20khz for my home theatre system as well as my cmputer system. Both of them have a flatter response=consistent volume throughout the playback of most of the freq, than my Bose system in my car.
That is basically the point, the source you use and how you measure it. A car is a difficult environment since even if you set it up something like a human or a bag of groceries gets in the way.Vince B wrote:I'm sorry to say but running a single sine wave for testing freq.resp. is not the optimal method to say the least. What did you use as a reference? An O-scope, calibrated spectrum analyzer? If so you should have used pink/white noise to calibrate/test. Further more just to mention I have never been a big fan of Bose speakers especially for home/pro sound use BUT I will have to say the system in my wifes G37 coupe is worlds better than the previous G35 coupe she had. After the G35 she went to an Acura and I personally think their Panasonic based systems lack adequate headroom but hey what do I know? I have only repaired consumer electronics for over 22 years, worked as a recording and pro sound engineer and have played various musical instruments on a professional level since I was 14 years old.
I don't understand half of what you said but it does sound cool. LOLVince B wrote:I'm sorry to say but running a single sine wave for testing freq.resp. is not the optimal method to say the least. What did you use as a reference? An O-scope, calibrated spectrum analyzer? If so you should have used pink/white noise to calibrate/test. Further more just to mention I have never been a big fan of Bose speakers especially for home/pro sound use BUT I will have to say the system in my wifes G37 coupe is worlds better than the previous G35 coupe she had. After the G35 she went to an Acura and I personally think their Panasonic based systems lack adequate headroom but hey what do I know? I have only repaired consumer electronics for over 22 years, worked as a recording and pro sound engineer and have played various musical instruments on a professional level since I was 14 years old.
Fleetwood Mac with Mick on the drums should do you.lucidd wrote:Ok- so I'm no sound expert- still learning- since I started to research sound in an audiophile way... Only a few yrs ago. So yes, still learning.
Source= sine wave 20hz-20khz downloaded from a source on net that is recommended by audiophile forum- I think it was AVforum or toms hardware...
I use an inexpensive Realistic sound level meter- I got from eBay... So it may NOT be the best tool... ... But I do have a secondary Pioneer MCACC mic (originally for my amp calibration)... Hooked up to my laptop-using freeware to measure it's input. It works- but not a professional way.
So I'm glad there's a professional sound guy here! Don't get me wrong- I'm not saying your wifes G is ______.. Like I sed, I got one too. Just on this forum, and really glad that there are members that can help and add and disagree with my findings-or senses.
Ok guys I do believe that a sine wave is definitive part of objectively measuring the freq response in any system... Measure of response• not necessarily a persons listening experience... Which incorporates a whole slew of other factors. I don't know if it is too much to ask- but can you guys try listening to some songs at mid-then higher volumes - with SNARE drums(or similar sounds) mixed with other instruments and vocals---? And let me know how that instrument sounds in comparison to the rest? Thanx in andvance!!! Just want see if only I get listener fatigue due to the snare drum set of freqs being too loud is common throughout all these systems or just mine? Thx L
An issue with using a sine wave and a graphic analyzer or other instrument is that it will show the peaks and valleys, it will not show harmonics and other qualities that count in a system. Consider the speakers as they output a sinewave at a particular frequency compared to outputting several at the same time.lucidd wrote:Source= sine wave 20hz-20khz downloaded from a source on net that is recommended by audiophile forum- I think it was AVforum or toms hardware...
---------------------------
Ok guys I do believe that a sine wave is definitive part of objectively measuring the freq response in any system... Measure of response• not necessarily a persons listening experience... Which incorporates a whole slew of other factors.
I actually find the lows fairly good, not with the punch that blows welds on your trunk but for a factory system, pretty good. The highs are a little harder for me to tell since that is one area I have a little problem with as well as dropouts in my right ear in voice ranges. But then this is the point of not trusting your ears. If I were to test everyone here they would all be different. Different or not that is how we do listen to music.audtatious wrote:I've had aftermarket systems in my cars since the mid 80's and can find little fault with the system in my coupe, being it is from the factory. Sure, highs could be clearer with aftermarket tweeters (easy fix.....Just don't know if I want my MB Quarts or JL's in there) and additional low frequency response would be improvements but for day to day listening I am very happy with the factory setup.
RTA/O-scope with pink noise is the only true way to determine the sound characteristics of an audio system. The only time I have found sine wave sweeps to be helpful in a car is to determine any major holes or if certain frequencies rattle interior parts. Pink noise tests are not the end-all either as having a flat response simply does not sound good, IMO. It's also not advisable to compare home systems to car systems either as in a home you have a large space and are usually 3-6-9-12+ feet away from the speakers where in the car you have proximity and on/off axis responses to deal with.
While I hated the Bose system in my previous 2k2 Maxima (and replaced it within 2 years of ownership) I am quite content with the setup Infiniti has put in the G.
To me with modern cars so much is tied to them. I debated this when purchasing my 'G'. If you want an aftermarket unit what do you do, get the base or get the upgrade. Which is the best to remove? Problem is that the audio unit is also the nav display, the display for a/c, etc. It is like having an all in one home unit and the dvd player dies with no external inputs.tollboothwilley wrote:You know what they say "No highs, no lows, must be BOSE"
Their high end home audio is a different story though.
I really hate the stock sound setup in the G as well. That is why it was the first thing to go. I've never liked the stock stereo in any car I've been in though. Its always the first thing changed out.
I will attribute most of the quality issues with the BOSE to the headunit, however, Even with an ALPINE HU the speakers virtually cut off at 10K Hz and the bass just sucks.
That being said, I'd never buy a car based off audio quality. They always suck.
In the case of aftermarket the issues I see is the interface. Nearly everything on the 'G' is a balanced output, everything on many amps are setup for non-balance. So you need to adapt. the other issue is simply mounting. In my 300m it was simply a single dim hu unit with a plastic adapater, for the 'G' it is a totally different story. What I see is that because of the display it may be the one to go first and replaced with another one dedicated to a new controller which interfaces to the rest such as nav, etc. Whatever it is not nearly as seemless as it could be. Even diagnostic functions for the car are tied to it.audtatious wrote:Factory can easily be adapted to aftermarket without losing functionality.
They don't so I'll just leave things alone for now. The trunk is small enough without me trying to stuff a sub and multiple amps into it. I don't want the added weight either.
Or go with a 40 buck adapter that provides 4 inputs. I think a lot of people do not take this into consideration and they end up with problems with their headunits that they can not figure out.audtatious wrote:I had not researched the outputs from the G-series headunits and assumed it was similar to the 2k2 Maxima Bose system. Being balanced outputs you can simply intercept the signal(s) before the amp(s) and attach RCA's. At that point you can utilize an amp that accepts balanced inputs and go from there. Additional reading tells me the amps do all the processing so the balanced signals should be flat. The end result would be a fully functional factory system with aftermarket amp(s)/speakers