EVO VIII or WRX STI

A General Discussion forum for cars and other topics, and a great place to introduce yourself if you are new to NICO!
nlzmo400r
Posts: 4904
Joined: Wed Feb 12, 2003 12:23 pm
Car: '02 Nissan Altima QR25DE
'93 Nissan 240SX hatch KA24DE

Post

theres always room for mods, and yes the space is quite cramped, but people have been modding them since their release, so theres plenty available, also, in response to J-SPECs post, yes, once the G35 coupe gets AWD it will be hands down the coolest car on the market IMO, but the price will put it far out of reach for potential evo8 or sti owners, if a 2wd G coupe cost arond 35k or so, an AWD coupe will EASILY (or so i would think) creep up to about 4ok-42k


User avatar
Cold_Zero
Posts: 6714
Joined: Sun Oct 20, 2002 4:15 pm
Car: 2003 Nissan Altima SE 3.5
2005 Nissan Pathfinder

Post

jEzTeR wrote:It is a tight space but it has a 60k mile warranty so any work would be done by the Subaru service dept and it has no need for mods!


Tsk tsk tsk. Who has a need for mods? You havent driven in my car lately.

jEzTeR
Posts: 5224
Joined: Sun Sep 15, 2002 2:34 pm
Car: '07 Infiniti FX35
'02 Nissan Altima SE 3.5
'93 Nissan 240SX Hatch
Contact:

Post

HeHe yes Bud I can see moding the WRX just not the STI.The 2.5 300hp 300lbs tq is plenty for me.;)

K1LLA916K
Posts: 252
Joined: Thu Apr 17, 2003 8:56 pm
Car: 2003 nissan sentra gxe

Post

i dont know where u ppl live but here in sacramento the most expensive 350z that i have seen so far at the car dealer was 28Ks. with tax etc i wud say 31Ks out the door with everything the car has to offer. okay so maybe the turbo kit might be expensive since it is extremely new to the market and im not sure if it has been released yet but slap some shyt off a 300zx TT and u got yourself more car than u cud imagine for 35Ks. besides, i think the 350z defines a sports car more than any other car in production for its price today. and that 287 hp aint not bad. thats serious heat for a 3.5 liter n/a 6 banger. oh yea and the backseat deal...hmm i say screw the new car and get yourself a 240sx with a s15 front conversion and a rb26dett. oh yeah. u know what im talking about. but thats a little farfetched. but well if u were thinking about a c4 vette, try checking ou the 03 stang cobras. 33Ks and 390 horses. did i mention backseats? o yeah and they so kick the sti ad the evos azz on the strip.

User avatar
Mr1der
Posts: 36020
Joined: Tue Sep 02, 2003 8:35 am
Car: It's still not a Nissan...
Location: Lebanon TN

Post

I'm thinking the Cobras actually run a high 13 where both the AWD cars run low 13's though. Besides, who wants to drag when you can be sideways in dirt?

jEzTeR
Posts: 5224
Joined: Sun Sep 15, 2002 2:34 pm
Car: '07 Infiniti FX35
'02 Nissan Altima SE 3.5
'93 Nissan 240SX Hatch
Contact:

Post

The C4 that I was thinking about was a ZR1.I said thinking because I do want the back seats pretty bad.

As far as the supercharged cobra..I like them but would never buy one just because everyone has a mustang,and they all look just about the same in V6 or supercharged V8 form.

cosmo
Posts: 833
Joined: Mon Oct 07, 2002 1:21 pm

Post

tinted wrote:So no one has thought about the insane possibilty of turboing the RX-8 :ylsuper :pface


I've heard that there have been some serious issues in doing so.

nlzmo400r
Posts: 4904
Joined: Wed Feb 12, 2003 12:23 pm
Car: '02 Nissan Altima QR25DE
'93 Nissan 240SX hatch KA24DE

Post

i like the o3 cobra, but i agree with jezter, it is a mustang, id take an STi over a cobra anyday

TurboKA37
Posts: 2602
Joined: Sat Jun 14, 2003 10:55 am
Contact:

Post

geez nlzmo! r u on NICO 24/7? everytime i open a email about some1 posting in a forum its always u.

User avatar
PalmerWMD
Posts: 14329
Joined: Mon Apr 29, 2002 3:14 pm
Car: 2004 350Z

Post

The Evo and STi do NOT run low 13's tehy run hi 13's to low 14 in all sitautions were they are driven by someone who actually <owns> the car.The G sedan with the AUTO can beat the EVO in the quarter mile when both are driven w/ minimal risk of breakage.

Fred..:)

User avatar
Mr1der
Posts: 36020
Joined: Tue Sep 02, 2003 8:35 am
Car: It's still not a Nissan...
Location: Lebanon TN

Post

but can the g sedan look as cool playing in mud?

nlzmo400r
Posts: 4904
Joined: Wed Feb 12, 2003 12:23 pm
Car: '02 Nissan Altima QR25DE
'93 Nissan 240SX hatch KA24DE

Post

TurboKA37 wrote:geez nlzmo! r u on NICO 24/7? everytime i open a email about some1 posting in a forum its always u.
i do what i can with what i got when i can do it ;)

nlzmo400r
Posts: 4904
Joined: Wed Feb 12, 2003 12:23 pm
Car: '02 Nissan Altima QR25DE
'93 Nissan 240SX hatch KA24DE

Post

PalmerWMD wrote:The Evo and STi do NOT run low 13's tehy run hi 13's to low 14 in all sitautions were they are driven by someone who actually <owns> the car.The G sedan with the AUTO can beat the EVO in the quarter mile when both are driven w/ minimal risk of breakage.

Fred..:)
i agree and disagree, but if you're going to go as far as saying minimal risk ,you woldnt be 'racing', basically, if you're willing to sacrifice clutches and limited slips, teh EVo8 and STi are both faster than a 35oZ 9/1o times. This is only from a standing 1/4 mile though, my friends have raced from 4omph, 6omph and 8omph roll ons, the 35oZ beating the evo8 every time. If the evo or sti is launched at reasonable rpm (i.e NOT REDLINE) hte 35oZ or G35 would probably beat them

User avatar
Mr1der
Posts: 36020
Joined: Tue Sep 02, 2003 8:35 am
Car: It's still not a Nissan...
Location: Lebanon TN

Post

straying from the actual point between the STi and Evo though, every test I've seen or read, the drivers typically put down quicker times in the Evo other than accelleration.

I still want an old Audi Turbo Quattro Coupe...

nlzmo400r
Posts: 4904
Joined: Wed Feb 12, 2003 12:23 pm
Car: '02 Nissan Altima QR25DE
'93 Nissan 240SX hatch KA24DE

Post

the a4?, i think they're great cars, but i would take an STi over either in a second, althought the audi is def nice on the inside and out, great fit and finish

User avatar
Mr1der
Posts: 36020
Joined: Tue Sep 02, 2003 8:35 am
Car: It's still not a Nissan...
Location: Lebanon TN

Post

no no, it was, I may be wrong, the first actual awd car, I think it's the car that lead to Group B being created in rally racing. It looked alot like the old GT Coupe but with really cool fender flares

User avatar
Mayhem_J30
Posts: 2643
Joined: Tue Apr 30, 2002 2:00 am
Car: Ummm...My Car
Location: Louisville, KY

Post

nlzmo400r wrote:i agree and disagree, but if you're going to go as far as saying minimal risk ,you woldnt be 'racing', basically, if you're willing to sacrifice clutches and limited slips, teh EVo8 and STi are both faster than a 35oZ 9/1o times. This is only from a standing 1/4 mile though, my friends have raced from 4omph, 6omph and 8omph roll ons, the 35oZ beating the evo8 every time. If the evo or sti is launched at reasonable rpm (i.e NOT REDLINE) hte 35oZ or G35 would probably beat them


From a roll the 350 is gonna kill it, no doubt. But on the 1/4 you HAVE to launch the Evo (maybe even the STi) from a high rpm. AWD owns the transmission due to no burn out. But anyway, read up on evolutionm.net. Those guys are all running 13's. When someone runs a 14.x they wonder what's wrong. I think some of the STi guys are even hitting high 12's and pegging 13's everytime. It's not hard to do. The launch on the Evo and STI is what it's all about. Check those 60's, they're dayum low.

User avatar
Bubba1
Moderator
Posts: 16082
Joined: Wed Oct 30, 2002 1:42 pm
Car: 2003 Nissan 350z
2024 Honda HR-V
2008 Toyota Corolla S
2001 Toyota Avalon XLS

Post

Mr1der. i believe you're speaking of the Sport Quattro, which looks like a GT coupe Quattro but with the flared fenders (and shorter wheelbase.) I have a friend who actually owns one. Pretty rare and awesome car. Lotsa carbon fiber and seriously fast. But not for the weak walleted.

User avatar
Mr1der
Posts: 36020
Joined: Tue Sep 02, 2003 8:35 am
Car: It's still not a Nissan...
Location: Lebanon TN

Post

yeah, that'd be the one, we only got like 500 or so of them over here I think....man they own...

User avatar
Bubba1
Moderator
Posts: 16082
Joined: Wed Oct 30, 2002 1:42 pm
Car: 2003 Nissan 350z
2024 Honda HR-V
2008 Toyota Corolla S
2001 Toyota Avalon XLS

Post

I think there are only a handful left in the states. Most are back in Europe. That was the original "unfair advantage" car. Factory rally monster. But comparing a Sport Quattro to an EVO/STi is like comparing a Mustang to a Ferrari.

Aztek72
Posts: 205
Joined: Thu Feb 20, 2003 4:06 pm

Post

Last year I had a really close call in my Q45. I mashed the pedal coming off an offramp. I pegged the tach at 7 grand doing 85mph to avoid a parade of big rigs in the slow lane and at the apex, the rear wheels lost a hold of the tarmac. What happened next was the mother of all slides. I went from the offramp and slid into the far left lane doing 90mph and in the process scared the **** out co-worker.

Since then and a dozen or so close calls in the Q and Supra I was on the lookout for a new AWD car. So when I had the chance to test drive the Evo and STI in August I sold the dawg. After all the test drives, I have an EVO parked next to my Q now. I'll list the pro's and con's of each:

EVO:

Pros:1- Great handling. The EVO is the better driver's car of the two. It's also easier for an average joe to jump in and drive fast. Handling is sharper and the brakes have better feel to them.2- Less body-roll.

Cons:1- Cheap interior. Besides the ergonomic, sporty recaros, the interior just screamed Rubbermaid. Jumping in the car reminded me of the new Alty.2- Less power. The power downlow is no match for the Suby. You have to keep running the tach at full-boil to make the best use of the power, dropping below 3k and you deal with big-time lag. STI:

Pros:

1- Way better power. There's no blips in this super-even powerband. 2- Audi-ish interior. The standard WRX had a really nice int. but Subaru ups the ante here- without seeing the Subaru impresa on the steering wheel, you'd think you were behind the wheel of an Volkswagen or Audi. The seats and color schemes is a nice touch as well. 3- The computerized differential control kicks glute.

Cons:

1-Brutish. There's nothing precise about this car, it's like using a broad sword to spread butter on your toast. The steering isn't as responsive as the EVO (or the Q for the matter)2- Despite the power advantage not as fast it's the Mitsu contemporary around the track.3- Bigger price tag.4- NO STEREO!?!?

I ended taking the EVO home because it's just the better real-world car of the two. I'm saving up some money for some minor (exhaust, intake, shocks, performance pads) mods. Still the verdict is you can't go wrong with either car.

TurboKA37
Posts: 2602
Joined: Sat Jun 14, 2003 10:55 am
Contact:

Post

the recaros in the EVO are a Con??

Aztek72
Posts: 205
Joined: Thu Feb 20, 2003 4:06 pm

Post

Please read again and try to comprehend this time.

TurboKA37
Posts: 2602
Joined: Sat Jun 14, 2003 10:55 am
Contact:

Post

oh now i see, i read it the wrong way

nlzmo400r
Posts: 4904
Joined: Wed Feb 12, 2003 12:23 pm
Car: '02 Nissan Altima QR25DE
'93 Nissan 240SX hatch KA24DE

Post

i thought the same about the evo8 interior, my chioce would still be an STi, but i wouldnt say comparing an audi quatro to an STi or evo is like comparing a mustang to a ferrari, thats a bit farfetched

Aztek72
Posts: 205
Joined: Thu Feb 20, 2003 4:06 pm

Post

nlzmo400r wrote:i thought the same about the evo8 interior, my chioce would still be an STi, but i wouldnt say comparing an audi quatro to an STi or evo is like comparing a mustang to a ferrari, thats a bit farfetched


If he's talking about those Gruppe B Quatro's then it's definitely not far-fetched. Audi made a few hundred homologation production versions of those beasts so they are indeed rare. Along with Formula 1, hill-climbers and funny car dragsters, the old gruppe B rally cars were the most extreme racing machines of the time. Some could reach 0-60 in 2.8 seconds and 1/4 times of 10 secs. flat and in gravel.

User avatar
Mr1der
Posts: 36020
Joined: Tue Sep 02, 2003 8:35 am
Car: It's still not a Nissan...
Location: Lebanon TN

Post

I'm hardcore, I'd take em both!

man Tommy Dreamer rocks...

User avatar
K240
Posts: 641
Joined: Fri Jun 27, 2003 9:36 pm
Car: 1993 240sx

Post

I think i would go for the STi even though i would hesitate. Subaru has been dealing with AWD cars for a while. =]

User avatar
Mr1der
Posts: 36020
Joined: Tue Sep 02, 2003 8:35 am
Car: It's still not a Nissan...
Location: Lebanon TN

Post

Audi Sports Quattro owns...and it's even a hatch back

User avatar
K240
Posts: 641
Joined: Fri Jun 27, 2003 9:36 pm
Car: 1993 240sx

Post

nlzmo400r wrote:i thought the same about the evo8 interior, my chioce would still be an STi, but i wouldnt say comparing an audi quatro to an STi or evo is like comparing a mustang to a ferrari, thats a bit farfetched


Thats true. =]


Return to “General Chat”