Bill Maher on tax increases...

A General Discussion forum for cars and other topics, and a great place to introduce yourself if you are new to NICO!
User avatar
RobPaulson
Posts: 6577
Joined: Mon Jun 09, 2008 4:04 am
Car: 2013 Subaru WRX

Post

RCA wrote: Who was talking to you?

Look was it an assumption, yes. But you are dramatic.
you were posting in a public forum homie. and i said what i said as a sort of an 'ib4'.

your statement was so blatently retarded and fanboish i had to comment. sorry your an easy target and i was bored :rotfl :rotfl


User avatar
AZhitman
Administrator
Posts: 54542
Joined: Mon Apr 29, 2002 2:04 am
Car: 58 L210, 63 Bluebird RHD, 64 NL320, 65 SPL310, 66 411 RHD, 67 WRL411, 68 510 SR20, 75 280Z RB25, 77 620 SR20, 79 B310, 90 Z32, 91 GTi-R, 92 Silvia Qs, 98 S14, 23 Z.
Location: Surprise, Arizona
Contact:

Post

Alfador wrote:I suppose the option alternative to a company maximizing profits would be a company willfully paying people they don't need to do a job more inefficiently. Sounds a lot like the federal government if you ask me.
:yesnod

Do Not Want.

User avatar
Jesda
Posts: 39644
Joined: Mon May 05, 2003 1:50 pm
Location: STL, DTW
Contact:

Post

AZhitman wrote:
PoorManQ45 wrote:What is your viewpoint on the government helping companies increase profits at the cost of American jobs?
I'd need examples. That's not a very well-worded question.
Its also loaded and misleading. PMQ should get a show on cable news.

User avatar
RCA
Posts: 8225
Joined: Mon Jan 22, 2007 8:09 am

Post

Alfador wrote:It's amusing that you make such petty assumptions with no basis in fact.

No. Honestly, I'm not religious. When I'm pressed on the issue by zealots I 'd categorize myself as agnostic. Who am I to say what is or isn't out there? You can't prove god exists to a skeptic anymore than you can prove he doesn't to a faithful. Some might characterize me as a quiet atheist (the kind who doesn't go around harassing people just for having religion). The truth of the matter is I really don't give two s***.

I'm here, now, and my belief of disbelief in a purportedly magical Jew isn't going to change the fact that I need to get up, go to work every morning, and earn my keep. It doesn't change the fact that something either offends my sensibilities or does not, and it does not change the fact that Bill Maher is a jackass, and people who belittle someone else just because of their religious beliefs are hypocrites barely better than organized hate groups like the KKK. The fact of the matter is someone has a belief structure different than yours, and for that, you hate them, possibly fear them, and belittle them for it.

Hypocrites like you make ridiculous straw man analogies to make those you disagree with look unreasonable, and it's just sad. It's hilarious that you inject what you claim to be my opinion into an argument when I have said no such thing, nor given any indicator that I believe it in the least. People who do that usually don't have anything of value to say so they just need to resort to hyperbole and logical fallacy to get their point across in the most asinine way possible. You may as well just go around calling people's mothers whores for all the good it will do.

Honestly, Stephen Schwarzman is just another rhetorical jackass, no different than Bill Maher. He just happens to be on a different end of the spectrum, and he doesn't get as much attention because he hasn't played the martyr card and cried about everyone hating him because he's a biggot like Maher did.
I posted this because I agree that the last people who should be up in arms are those being taxed. It is a 3% hike but their wealth has grow and for the other 95% it hasn't and some of the things said are ridiculous. You respond by ridiculing Bill Maher instead of posting how you feel about the comments. I haven't seen all his stuff so to be honest I have no idea why so many are up in arms but either way, why would you post unless it was relevant. It seemed like you were just babbling on about nothing.
RobPaulson wrote:you were posting in a public forum homie. and i said what i said as a sort of an 'ib4'. your statement was so blatently retarded and fanboish i had to comment. sorry your an easy target and i was bored :rotfl :rotfl
I don't agree but that's fine.

Next time change your verbiage, because it's deceiving.

Alfador
Posts: 3043
Joined: Thu May 19, 2005 4:55 pm
Car: 1990 Nissan 240SX Hatch
Location: The People's Republic of Taxachusetts
Contact:

Post

RCA wrote: I posted this because I agree that the last people who should be up in arms are those being taxed. It is a 3% hike but their wealth has grow and for the other 95% it hasn't and some of the things said are ridiculous. You respond by ridiculing Bill Maher instead of posting how you feel about the comments. I haven't seen all his stuff so to be honest I have no idea why so many are up in arms but either way, why would you post unless it was relevant. It seemed like you were just babbling on about nothing.
You posted something from the reigning king of being a d!ck. Even to his fans and supporters he's known to be highly polarizing. To not expect responses critical of him in general is foolish. Beyond that, you took the extra step of making false assumptions about people you don't really know in some recoiled defensive attempt at eloquence.

As for the actual tax matter. It's all rhetoric. Meaningless, divisive, pompous rhetoric. He is pretty much everything he accuses everyone else of being, i.e. a "useless schmuck who contributes absolutely nothing to society " and gets paid for being such.

The wealthy already contribute more to the financial underpinning of society than anyone else, and honestly, that whole redistribution of wealth thing was tried, and it didn't work out so well. He blames trillion dollar deficits on rich people paying taxes, when the federal gov't just gave the state of MA a couple million bucks for actually LOWERING their educational standards to conform with federal standards for public schools. We now teach things at later years because it makes the rest of the country look bad when we don't. We're getting federal grant money to do that. That's some good spending right there.

Tax what you want, it really doesn't matter. To whine about the whiners wining is in and of itself, whining. When investment curtails because the money is being taken away to feed "overworked" social programs giving handouts to people, job growth will stall (as if it hasn't already) and we can go right back to overworking our newly liberated free lunches with a new line of people who just lost out on the job market and wind up right back where we started. Plinking a tax rate up and down a half a point isn't going to make that better or worse. Modern economic systems are too self correcting to have their balances swayed by such meaningless gestures.

User avatar
PoorManQ45
Posts: 16676
Joined: Fri Jul 02, 2004 5:13 pm

Post

Jesda wrote:
AZhitman wrote: I'd need examples. That's not a very well-worded question.
Its also loaded and misleading. PMQ should get a show on cable news.
Hehe, I <3 jesda.

It was a completely loaded question. There was no right answer to that question Greg. If you had answered it would just make you look bad :biggrin:


Return to “General Chat”