Jacko3 wrote:Minmey15:
Then, how do we explain the use of traction control and ABS in Formula 1 cars and in the GT-R, since these sports cars are way beyond GT cars? These technologies should technically hinder the classification of these types of vehicles as non-sports oreinted cars.
Anyway, thanks for the info on the Nissan brand of cars. Yes, the Skyline and Skyline GT-R are different cars. How is your day coming along?
I was talking about your precious rear active steer. If you look around, do you see rear active steer on Formula 1 car? Now days, ABS has gotten so much better. 10 years ago, no ABS can come close to our foot, but now days, it is so much better. So I was never talking about ABS. It is pretty much standard. But traction control, Like C-Kwik was saying, totally different from Formula one traction ocntrol system. For you to use it in your arguement is just pathetic and laughable.
And to translate what you said, you think my statement excludes GT-R from being a sports car because it has traction control?
Again, do you know anything about difference between Skyline and Skyline GT-R? Our Skyline has been Front engine, rear-wheel-drive. Skyline GT-R, since BNR32, has been Front engine, all-wheel-drive, which is based on rear-wheel-drive, but once you start to lose control, it splits torque between front and rear from 0/100 to 50 /50. Are you seriously comparing this Attessa system and our little so called traction system we have in our car? Have you ever driven Skyline GT-R or real performance cars? If you have, you wouldn't compare G35 and those cars.
But to answer your question, I do not consider Skyline GT-R a sports car. Nissan brought Skyline GT-R back in 89 as BNR32 for one reason. To win Group A racing. Nissan developed RB26DETT to use in that race, and that is why it is capable of handling 600WHP without so much problems. So.. I consider Skyline GT-R a street version of a race car.