alloveru wrote:I find this funny that this issue is still going on. I purchased a Rogue in early 08. Had the transmission replaced twice within the 6 months that I had it and still had the rattle. After a bit of complaining, Nissan bought me out. Switched to the Murano and hadn't had an issue. Now I am in a 2011 Infiniti EX35, love it so far!
I just find it hard to believe that anyone I talk to still complain about this rattle. Good luck with it!
To be fair and accurate I would say that there is not a problem with the design of the Rogue transmission. As with any vehicle there is a very small number of owners who have had problems with the transmission, but this has been very rare particularly with later models (the early 2008 builds appeared to have quite a few issues but replacement of the transmission has all but eliminated complaints other than in some very rare incidents). Also, I have only read about one case where the CVT actually failed, the rattle issue that some experienced did not lead to failure or dangerous driving conditions.
The reliability of the Rogue is rated very high, much higher than average, and complaints about the transmission are very rare as I've observed over 3 years of ownership and membership on this forum. If you look at average reliability vehicle or below average like most Dodge/Chrysler vehicles and many of the GM products you will most certainly see more failures. However, when you read about failures of conventional transmissions, you do not have people saying "the design of the conventional transmission is flawed - it's a bad design, I will not purchase another auto transmission again". Of course not, that would be crazy, the conventional transmission is a good design generally speaking but it's a complex mechanical component that can have problems, the same with Nissan's transmissions. Even though they're more reliabled than say a Dodge auto trans, if there are a few vehicles with problems some people jump to the conclusion "see, Nissan CVT trans is a bad design, and it has "has problems" don't buy this car!". But of course that is not fair, every single vehicle out there will have a small number of problems including the luxury brands Lexus etc..
I'm just trying to keep things in perspective and to be objective, if you look at the facts Nissan is still much better than most domestic brands, a lot of the Volkswagen products (contrary to popular belief) etc..
I always like to pull out my story about my friend who bought a new 2008 Toyota RAV4, it had everything wrong with it, squeeks and rattles galore, and a transmission that kept failing and leaving him stranded. It was replaced 3 times before they either bought it back or he traded it in (maybe a combo of the two). To this day he says that Toyota's are garbage, in particular their transmissions are the worst. But here's the lesson, my friend is wrong, Toyota's and the RAV4 in particular are very well-built machines, his one bad experience is just an anomyly that all manufactures have to deal with and it does not mean that all RAV4's are garbage.
It's very tough when researching vehicles and specific problems to determine the level of significance of an issues, because regardless of the car if you research online forums you're going to read about problems. Remember that people only post on forums when they're having problems and are much less likely to post about trouble-free cars, which makes it difficult to base an informed opinion on.