Grow up, please.vicQ45 wrote:my pen15
If you don't have anything worthwhile to say, don't bother posting. Next time, I will simply use the delete button instead.
Z
Grow up, please.vicQ45 wrote:my pen15
man, you must have had the complete opposite experience i had...i was extremely happy with that car. i never had any problems with it, other than having to replace the headgasket witha metal one and arp fasteners.of all the cars i've owned, i miss that one the mostsensibleS13driver wrote:IMO the MK3 Supra is most definitely NOT underrated. It is a piece of crap in most respects; unreliable, uninspiring, overweight, undersprung.
No, it's not a Porsche because it's watercooled!BadMojo wrote:Interesting choice. On one hand, it's a Porsche, so you could argue that it's starting off from a position of "over-rated". Still, the Boxster does have the odd stigma of being the "Porsche for ladies".
I find the unquestioning devotion to the rear-engine 911 to be kind of odd. Do the 911 faithful really believe that the Boxster's not a Porsche because it's mid engine?
OK, but is the Cayman S a Porsche? It did reputedly spank the Carrera S on the 'Ring. I'm sure 911 owners around the world shed a tear when they read that.charlieo wrote:No, it's not a Porsche because it's watercooled!
Think outside the box, 6k for that TA would be a good buy. I could sell it later on and make a few $$$ I wasn't actually serious about my lowball offer to Statix but would still buy it if he said yes. I am still waiting for a nice S2000 though.charlieo wrote:Whoa whoa whoa?
Miata>S2000>TA? Makee no sensee!.
Great calls!wonS14aero wrote:Mazda 626 GT turbo
Mazda MX-6 GT turbo
Mitsubishi Mirage turbo
Ditto. It had good really underrated cars in the beginning of the thread now everyone is just naming cars that if they were more common would be rated but because no one has heard of them, they are then proclaimed "underrated" which they aren't, they are just rare!SeVa-S13 wrote:This has now become the "Cool, not-so-common-anymore cars" thread apparently...