I thought they do overhaul only once every 5 years??Altima coupe's been out for 4 years already!?@@mcheddadi wrote:just caught an interesting bit of informationhttp://www.edmunds.com/insidel...58251
"The Altima sits in a holding pattern, awaiting a major overhaul for model-year 2011."
anyone want to guess?
i'd say a version of the VQ37VHR or the VQ35HR (high reving)HLSD as an option. rwd maybe? if its RWD it would only be on a SE-R model or a nismo edition that could compete with the base 370z.
Hussain wrote:just looked and the I4 accord has 190HP, not 200 HP. but then again, the next gen Accord will come out the same time as the next gen altima so they may boost that power to 200 HP... we all know Honda has the motor (K20)....
lol sorry haha I didn't check the last page I thought my comment was the last on the pageHussain wrote:i replied to myself because in the previous comment i said they wouldnt do a VQ37HR or VQ35HR motor in the next gen altimas because they didnt in the maxima and that Nissan needs to bump up the power in the 2.5s to 200 HP and that the accord already has 200 hp.... then i checked and the accord has 190 hp.
well I've driven a turbo FWD nissan Altima putting an estimated 300+HP TO THE WHEELS, and I can tell you, our FWD car handles just fine at higher HP... in NO WAY are we pushing our cars to the limit now with 230 whp ...LinkNuc wrote:Don't forget its FWD, we are pushing the limit now for our weight. I wouldn't expect much more power.
I highly doubt that... to increase from 270 to 280 just isn't enough, not by today's standards... for the next generation Nissan altima Coupe, I say around 305 HP...kenya wrote:I would guess that the next rev of the Altima will have approx 280 HP on the same 3.5 VQ platform
revo knuckles did give out a new hope to all fwd enthusiasts out there. it's on the new ford focus RS and it's been highly acclaimed since its introduction.08Coupe wrote:I wouldn't expect much more then 300HP Crank on a FWD from the factory...period! They have to cover repairs and consider long term problems, front wheel trannys just dont like massive power. So the bean counters won't do it, if it was a good idea it would have been done a long time ago I fear the days of big power cars may slowly be coming to a end anyways ~~~Crap and trade
I think what he meant was pushing the traction/handling limit. the extra 70hp of blakes car can't be good on turns on a track. it must understeer like madness in the turns at high speeds. mecanical hlsd, with double wishbone suspentions or revoknuckles is the future for breaking the 300s barier and get great handling.rjdmmfl1 wrote:
well I've driven a turbo FWD nissan Altima putting an estimated 300+HP TO THE WHEELS, and I can tell you, our FWD car handles just fine at higher HP... in NO WAY are we pushing our cars to the limit now with 230 whp ...
I should have clarified my statement, I was well aware that he was talking about traction on a FWD with high horsepower... and that was my point.. I driven Blake's car and at high speeds, his car handled exremely well, never lost traction once... hell, our car from the factory loses traction on turns, but i think that has more to do with the crappy afctory tires, super high riding suspension, and lack of a decent front strit bar...mcheddadi wrote:
I think what he meant was pushing the traction/handling limit. the extra 70hp of blakes car can't be good on turns on a track. it must understeer like madness in the turns at high speeds. mecanical hlsd, with double wishbone suspentions or revoknuckles is the future for breaking the 300s barier and get great handling.
on slippery conditions and in any turns the car will understeer because of the laws of physics and because that the car has an open diff.rjdmmfl1 wrote:but with a decent suspension overhaul (even without your precious HLSD), the A/c handles 300 hp to the wheels without a problem... so the extra 30 horses at the crank shouldn't be too much for the car to handle
eh, ill just stick to going in straight lines like most people here in America lol even with my crappy factory tires i had insane grip at the track... i mean, i couldnt do a burn out at the track if i tried to! on the streets i could tho lol but CVT 3.se have tons of traction... stick shifts are a little faster BUT they cant put any of that power down to the ground off the line..... CVT FTW!mcheddadi wrote:
all this mumbo jumbo only means that on fwd, unless you can increase the traction of your car, to extra HP will be useless because after the traction limit point your car will only be able to understeer because one of the wheel will be slipping. but in a HLSD equipped car. you'll be able to use that extra torque without understeering.
anyhow, I don't doubt that blake's car is a great handling car.
The VQ could take regular before. The premium thing is really just better to prevent engine knock. However, with such things as knock sensors and timing control, there really is a low chance of that happening. I'm sure many people have run regular in their VQ and saw no problems. I personally only run premium, just for the benefits of a higher octane and the cleaning additives for the fuel system.2008AltiCoupeDan wrote:im pissed tht the VQ will now take regular cus i woulda f***in taken that goddamn engine 2nd to none. and the short shifter s***- wtf on the 6spd. so now they are gna have more s*** for the VQ's an less for us QR's makes me want to turbo mine now- but i'll still get f***ed for premium. it just pisses me off now. if they create a nismo or a se-r version im gna s*** my f***in pants. an u guys kno i dnt go on a swearfest unless im f***in pissed. i feel like the QR in its limitedness now is gna be the 'cheap' engine like the 1.8 on the sentra- no one cares about it unless its a point a to point b car. ppl like us care more about other s*** and it just f***s me in the a** to know that they are doin more versions of a higher model.
i understand what you're saying... my point was that if our car doesn't suffer from really bad understeer now, I doubt an extra 30hp at the crank is the 'magical" amount to cause super significant understeer...mcheddadi wrote:
on slippery conditions and in any turns the car will understeer because of the laws of physics and because that the car has an open diff.
in a turn, if you have the same cars but one with an open diff and the other with a torsen type diff (hlsd) the car with the torsen will be able to go faster because A limited slip differential can apply varying levels of torque to either wheel, while an open differential can only apply equal turning force on both wheels on the drive.
all this mumbo jumbo only means that on fwd, unless you can increase the traction of your car, to extra HP will be useless because after the traction limit point your car will only be able to understeer because one of the wheel will be slipping. but in a HLSD equipped car. you'll be able to use that extra torque without understeering.
anyhow, I don't doubt that blake's car is a great handling car.
I'm absolutely certain that you have done all your research on wikipedia and what not, but know this, I have broken traction in my car, maybe a half a dozen times. Now, most of that is due to the CVT. Knowing what understeer feels like in many different fast FWD cars I've built, I can tell you it is about 10% now of what it used to be, and it was never that bad from the start.mcheddadi wrote:
on slippery conditions and in any turns the car will understeer because of the laws of physics and because that the car has an open diff.
in a turn, if you have the same cars but one with an open diff and the other with a torsen type diff (hlsd) the car with the torsen will be able to go faster because A limited slip differential can apply varying levels of torque to either wheel, while an open differential can only apply equal turning force on both wheels on the drive.
all this mumbo jumbo only means that on fwd, unless you can increase the traction of your car, to extra HP will be useless because after the traction limit point your car will only be able to understeer because one of the wheel will be slipping. but in a HLSD equipped car. you'll be able to use that extra torque without understeering.
anyhow, I don't doubt that blake's car is a great handling car.
thanks for your first hand impressions Blake since you drive a boosted A/C...adidas2go wrote:
I'm absolutely certain that you have done all your research on wikipedia and what not, but know this, I have broken traction in my car, maybe a half a dozen times. Now, most of that is due to the CVT. Knowing what understeer feels like in many different fast FWD cars I've built, I can tell you it is about 10% now of what it used to be, and it was never that bad from the start.
Now, I'm not knocking your mods, or saying a LSD is a bad idea, but I never felt the necessity to get one, and I have the power to actually utilize one. If you've noticed, there are 4 force inducted coupes on this forum, and with our resources, knowledge, and craftsmanship, none of us have found the need to use an LSD on the Altima Coupe.
Why may you ask? Its because with a 2 inch drop, frame stiffening sway bars, strut tower bars, endlinks, and wide rubber, there just isn't a need too. If I'm not breaking traction in a 20 mph turn going 65 at 6 pounds of boost, then neither should anyone else with even the simple additions of springs and new rubber.
So, to sum up this discussion that needed some first hand experience. I will break down the Altima's handling spectrum here. So, say we start the Altima Coupe out with a 70% slip rating for under steer. A car like a hyndai accent would have 100%.
Ok, so starting with 70%, we add springs, that will knock you down to 50%, the biggest addition you will do. Adding 7.5 inch or wider tires, will drop you down to 35%. The rear sway bar will drop you down to about 25%, front strut tower bar - 15% and the endlinks will bring you down to 10%. That's how I would break down my suspension on reducing under steer. I have felt these figures through my car, and my own body running my coupe through the canyons.
naww bruh, actually you got us back on topic... that's a good question... i went by Mossy nissan today to see of they had the new A/c's in stock.. saw one of the crooks9salesmen) at the stealership and asked him if he knew when they would be getting any in stock... he looks at my car and is like, well they didn't really change much on the new car...RaZmAn wrote:sorry for changing the current topic, but when is nissan going to update their website with the 2010 models of AC? I've been waiting patiently....aren't they supposed to be on sale oct 5th? Also they redid their financing deals for october and made it exactly what it was for september...
rjdmmfl1 wrote:
naww bruh, actually you got us back on topic... that's a good question... i went by Mossy nissan today to see of they had the new A/c's in stock.. saw one of the crooks9salesmen) at the stealership and asked him if he knew when they would be getting any in stock... he looks at my car and is like, well they didn't really change much on the new car...
I was like, well actually they changed the hood, front bumper, and headlights... they now have projectors... he's like ... uhh, you mean Xenons , they already had xenons... I'm like, uhh, no, they now have projector headlights, they never had projector headlights... he goes in and i guess checks, then he coem back with some crap about how projectpors have been around since the 90's on cars like the integra.. and i look at him like WTF are you talking about... i then breka down the diffeence between Xenons and projectors, and end the convo with.. "dude, you should know something about the car you're trying to sell" and just walked off.... its amazing how phucking brainless some of these salesmen are...