What would you pay for a Supercharger kit?

General discussion forum about the 240sx, and a great place to introduce yourself to the board!
240Knightrider
Posts: 3383
Joined: Tue Jan 13, 2004 6:48 pm
Contact:

Post

Hey everyone, im working on a supercharger kit for the 240's.

I just want in idea on what everyone would actually pay for a working Supercharger kit. Thanks

Roots Blower with 6-71/2lb pulleyAll mounting brakets, screws, nuts, bolts, washersIntercooler, Piping or aftercoolerBeltFMUFuel Pump

Upgrades would include Injectors, fuel pump.. etc
Modified by 240Knightrider at 12:02 AM 12/17/2005


User avatar
masticatingcow
Posts: 2338
Joined: Fri Nov 07, 2003 8:39 am
Car: 94 Mazda FD3S

Post

What type of charger are we talking about? What would be included in the kit?

240Knightrider
Posts: 3383
Joined: Tue Jan 13, 2004 6:48 pm
Contact:

Post

Roots style blower, intercooled, all hardware included (ex. mouting brakets, pulley, etc.)

User avatar
95lstegman
Posts: 501
Joined: Tue Nov 01, 2005 8:09 am
Car: 1989 570SX, 2005 Acura RSX, 1994 Toyota Corolla

Post

if it's like an average Jackson Racing kit (but more reliable), with the ability to crank it up to 10-12psi (with varying pullies) and intercool it with water injection, and comes with EVERYTHING needed, including brackets, bolts, nuts, washers, belts, pullies, and FUEL MANAGEMENT, then i think a similar price to Jackson Racing would be fair, as long as you offer a warranty on the product. i think $2500 would be very fair, not to mention worthwhile, for a kit that comes at 7psi with no water injection. water injection and higher boost pullies could be optioned for ~$300-400 something and ~$100-150, respectively. perhaps a full high-boost kit could come with pullies for 10psi, a fuel pressure regulator to up the pressure a specified amount, and a different program on the ECU. perhaps $500 or so for that.

i think any kit sold MUST come with appropriate fuel management; at minimum, a set of 370cc SR injectors and a chipped, pre-tuned ECU designed to work with an engine that has s/c, header, and exhaust. i know it's pretty easy to chip SR ECU's. i've never busted open a KA ECU, but it seems most japanese ECU's can be chipped, and it would be a powerful, cheap method for providing fuel management, and far better than the piggy-back e-manage versions and such that come with some turbo kits.

240Knightrider
Posts: 3383
Joined: Tue Jan 13, 2004 6:48 pm
Contact:

Post

I didnt think about injectors being include but thats a good idea.

Im thinking I will start the base kit being

Roots Blower with 7lb pulleyAll mounting brakets, screws, nuts, bolts, washersIntercooler, Piping.Belt

I would step up from that.
Modified by 240Knightrider at 1:10 PM 12/16/2005

User avatar
95lstegman
Posts: 501
Joined: Tue Nov 01, 2005 8:09 am
Car: 1989 570SX, 2005 Acura RSX, 1994 Toyota Corolla

Post

please add injectors and ECU. it won't add that much, and will really help it be a bolt-on deal. contact a decent nearby tuner once you have a kit ready and have them make a chipped ECU for you for a few hundred bucks, then maybe $100 each after that with the same program. then you just buy used SR injectors and you've got a fuel system that costs you ~$200 and would be damned good and dead reliable.

User avatar
AeonTorpor
Posts: 404
Joined: Tue Jun 07, 2005 2:24 pm
Car: 1991 Nissan 240SX SE
Contact:

Post

Yeah, I deffinately agree with 95lstegman about how depends on how advanced the kit is. I already know 2 or 3 people that would probably be interested in getting a supercharger setup for the 240. And $1000-1500 for a base kit would be great, but i'd bet they'd push for the higher kit because of the extra time and money for injectors and ecu/tuning.

User avatar
Chezedik
Posts: 4726
Joined: Tue Dec 17, 2002 8:35 pm
Car: 1991 Nissan 240sx

Post

+1, w/o Fuel Management, it isn't worth doing.

chrislis
Posts: 2794
Joined: Mon Aug 29, 2005 7:44 pm
Car: 1998 240sx sE!
Contact:

Post

give me one for free and i'll wear your stickers on the inside of my hood. sounds like a sponsor, eh?

240Knightrider
Posts: 3383
Joined: Tue Jan 13, 2004 6:48 pm
Contact:

Post

Doing some quick research I will be donig some fuel management. Not to sure im gonna use SR injectors though. As for the ECU tuned im still looking into that.

chrislis
Posts: 2794
Joined: Mon Aug 29, 2005 7:44 pm
Car: 1998 240sx sE!
Contact:

Post

would the fuel management for a supercharger be pretty similiar to that of a turbo? im not too informed on superchargers... just wonderin.

User avatar
Chezedik
Posts: 4726
Joined: Tue Dec 17, 2002 8:35 pm
Car: 1991 Nissan 240sx

Post

Yes, you just need to match a mass of fuel to a mass of air.

User avatar
MS180SX
Posts: 372
Joined: Thu Jun 23, 2005 1:42 am
Car: 1989 Hatch- Crushed
1993 Hatch- Sold
2004 350z- wrecked
2005 STI- sold
2003 CBR 954RR- Sold
2005 Chevy Colorado- Sold
1972 Chevy Nova- Gas eater
Contact:

Post

id pay about 2000 for a supercharger kit.. One would be real nice for our 2.4's.... so hurry up before i finish my turbo kit...


240Knightrider
Posts: 3383
Joined: Tue Jan 13, 2004 6:48 pm
Contact:

Post

im estimating it will be done, tested and being sold to NICO club members six months from now. I will start with nico and expand. I guess ill have to become a sponsor

User avatar
95lstegman
Posts: 501
Joined: Tue Nov 01, 2005 8:09 am
Car: 1989 570SX, 2005 Acura RSX, 1994 Toyota Corolla

Post

chrislis wrote:would the fuel management for a supercharger be pretty similiar to that of a turbo? im not too informed on superchargers... just wonderin.
Chezedik wrote:Yes, you just need to match a mass of fuel to a mass of air.
mostly the same, yes. it wouldn't be dead on b/c the supercharger will create boost down low where a turbo really won't, and a supercharger will also more than likely heat the intake charge more than a turbo unless there is a really efficient intercooler. but pretty much there differences would be minimal. i think what you were trying to get at was "would i be able to use my turbo setup's fuel management for a s/c at the same boost level," and the answer to that is no. if you're asking if it would be about the same tuning level, then the answer is "yes."

Kouks
Posts: 763
Joined: Mon Apr 18, 2005 12:32 pm
Car: 1996 Nissan 240sx S14 Sr20det
Location: Jacksonville FL

Post

2000 is fair. Proof of it working and quality parts, i have a ca, or otherwise i would have done it. This is only going to be for a dohc right? SOHC manifold is totally different.

97ka-t
Posts: 1938
Joined: Thu May 26, 2005 9:43 am
Car: 1996 Nissan Maxima
1998 Nissan Altima
Contact:

Post

I'd pay a $2.5k for a full kit w/ fuel management and intercooler.

A34D4ME
Posts: 162
Joined: Wed Dec 14, 2005 11:54 am
Car: 89 coup

Post

I thought of removing the exhaust side from a turbo and gearing it up. I think that's how the Vortec type work anyway. Problem is, where to put it?

Anyway, I can't see how you could make a cost efficient roots type unless you sell a whole lot of them. Given that companies that are already set up for this don't make one, I highly doubt its feasible.

240Knightrider
Posts: 3383
Joined: Tue Jan 13, 2004 6:48 pm
Contact:

Post

A34D4ME wrote:I thought of removing the exhaust side from a turbo and gearing it up. I think that's how the Vortec type work anyway. Problem is, where to put it?

Anyway, I can't see how you could make a cost efficient roots type unless you sell a whole lot of them. Given that companies that are already set up for this don't make one, I highly doubt its feasible.
Not feasible, watch and learn buddy.

not feasible, thats funny

DjPantsSpecR
Posts: 1711
Joined: Fri Jan 14, 2005 12:49 pm
Car: 93 Nissan MS13
92 Nissan RMS13

Post

roots or centrifugal?

either way i wont throw down any more than 1300 without an intercooler or and fuel management

User avatar
GrilledCheese33
Posts: 4745
Joined: Mon Apr 04, 2005 3:29 pm
Car: 2008 Nissan Xterra
1972 Yamaha R5
2017 Sea Doo Spark Trixx
Location: 386 FL

Post

id sya around 2k, maybe more after I hear your power results and maybe some videos of one You might have one hell of an idea going here. I know i'll be a customer if all works out for you.

gepeto
Posts: 1173
Joined: Mon Dec 20, 2004 5:41 am
Car: 1995 S14
Contact:

Post

Let's see the results and parts list but I'd be ready to spend 2000$us easily.

A34D4ME
Posts: 162
Joined: Wed Dec 14, 2005 11:54 am
Car: 89 coup

Post

What, did I misspell feasible?

Anyway, I'm glad you're so confident. Do you have access to a machine shop? Why a roots type blower and not a screw type?

Do you have something in mind? If I had the equipment, I would go for a centrfugal type - just add a gear box to a big turbo.

InsanityInc
Posts: 2521
Joined: Wed Aug 18, 2004 7:43 am
Contact:

Post

Whatever you do, could you do us folks in CA a favor and get it CARB approved? The process is extremely simple and I think it costs like 50 bucks.

BomexS13
Posts: 2561
Joined: Fri Dec 19, 2003 8:36 pm
Car: '89 Nissan 240SX
'00 Toyota Celica

Post

Id like to see this. Do you have the finished product?

TheOne
Posts: 1836
Joined: Mon Aug 09, 2004 4:28 pm
Car: 93 240sx FB
Location: Arlington, TX

Post

A34D4ME wrote:Why a roots type blower and not a screw type?
a twin-screw supercharger is more expensive than a roots, and as far as i know lynsolm only makes so many screw type rotors, i believe they own the patents or whatever to those, and kennebell/whipple/saleen and other supercharger companies buy'em off of lynsolm, thats why the 07 shelby cobra GT500 wont have a twin-screw(because of supply issues of twin-screw superchargers).

i'd pay $2k for it, maybe even $2500 for it + some form of fuel upgrade.

User avatar
hybrid_flyer
Posts: 790
Joined: Thu Jun 17, 2004 12:51 pm
Car: 95 240sx SE wrecked....89 240 coupe now

Post

240Knightrider wrote:Doing some quick research I will be donig some fuel management. Not to sure im gonna use SR injectors though. As for the ECU tuned im still looking into that.
contact JWT, they reprogram ka ecu's for turbos, i dont think it would be that much different for a blower. But I would def. be in for one, about 12-15 lbs is what I am lookin for.

User avatar
hybrid_flyer
Posts: 790
Joined: Thu Jun 17, 2004 12:51 pm
Car: 95 240sx SE wrecked....89 240 coupe now

Post

[QUOTE

Anyway, I'm glad you're so confident. Do you have access to a machine shop? Why a roots type blower and not a screw type?

Do you have something in mind? If I had the equipment, I would go for a centrfugal type - just add a gear box to a big turbo.[/QUOTE]

centrifugal blowers can suffer from lag like turbos do under high psi applications. roots aare power from idle to redline (as I understand it)

InsanityInc
Posts: 2521
Joined: Wed Aug 18, 2004 7:43 am
Contact:

Post

hybrid_flyer wrote:centrifugal blowers can suffer from lag like turbos do under high psi applications. roots aare power from idle to redline (as I understand it)
Centrifugal blowers don't really suffer from lag the same way as a turbo, but due to reduction gearing their power delivery as compared to RPM will be noticably non-linear. However, there is never a spool time as the blower is belt-driven off the engine so lag with a centrifugal supercharger does not occur with throttle position changes, which is the main problem with turbos and road racing.

User avatar
95lstegman
Posts: 501
Joined: Tue Nov 01, 2005 8:09 am
Car: 1989 570SX, 2005 Acura RSX, 1994 Toyota Corolla

Post

exactly what i was going to say. centrifugals don't have lag per se, but boost does build with engine speed, so if you're making 8psi at redline, you'll much less in the midrange and practically nothing at 2000rpm, maybe 3psi at 3000rpm. not useful, not fun. more power thanks to better efficiency at the huge cost of tiny boost at low engine speeds.

and don't get JWT to do your ECU unless you don't mind spending a ton on it. they charge $500+ each.

and BTW, i don't think you'll be seeing 12-15psi out of a roots-type s/c kit unless it's specifically made to supply that much. one designed for 7psi won't cut it at all.


Return to “240sx General Discussion”