assuming eibach is 1" all around.... 1.2-1.3 is perfectmrmark wrote:So would the same spring rate and about .2-.4 " lower drop than Eibach do the trick?
Turnaround would depend on Road Magnets availability and my availability.
assuming eibach is 1" all around.... 1.2-1.3 is perfectmrmark wrote:So would the same spring rate and about .2-.4 " lower drop than Eibach do the trick?
Turnaround would depend on Road Magnets availability and my availability.
sameDominican Drift wrote:Im interested but I would like to see Specs and price before i get into anything.
Well......I don't think they're going to tear a car apart and develop a spring without some commitment on purchasing. Once we agree on specs, we will need deposits from 12 buyers. If not, the project will not happen.Dominican Drift wrote:Im interested but I would like to see Specs and price before i get into anything.
Well, I cared a great deal before I purchased the Eibachs. Eibach took the R&D and produced the springs with precision tolerance, block resistance, light weigh materials, road tested, etc.. Plus, they took into consideration the weight of the car and rated the springs then supplied a 1.0 drop all around. Now, I'm going to sound like a broken record, but... I thing Eibach could have gotten away with a 1.0 front & 1.1 rear and this is what I'm suggesting for the RM's.auditech10 wrote:See nobody cared of the specs on the Eibachs they just called everywhere and anywhere trying to find them.
To the R&D Dept monitoring this thread:mrmark wrote:Unfortunately, the R&D department has been monitoring this thread and decided there wasn't enough true interest to warrant them spending all that time to measure and develop a spring setup.
Funny how no one is asking the right questions about dynamic performance and damper rate matching.caug1 wrote:how could you guys buy springs that has no specs. what if springs turns out softer then they already are. it's a no no.are these springs progressive or regular?WHATS UP WITH YOU GUYS?
I think on 3 people agreed to front a deposit, and that wasn’t going to cut it. We needed 12, so that is what stopped the project in its tracks.Eyedea wrote:
To the R&D Dept monitoring this thread:
Quite unfair to make a judgement on interest considering we haven't had any input from the manufacturer as per specs, deposit amount, turn around times, reliability, price range of the final product etc from you.
So far the communication has been from a proxy, MRMark. For your information, there are more people buying this platform and the interest in the springs will not change. We need this item.Would be great if you gave us an input on this before we trash this thread and move on to other sources.
Here's an idea.....why not put together the specs via your vast knowledge and post it here. That way we can see who is really serious and I can possibly get this back on track.maxnix wrote:Funny how no one is asking the right questions about dynamic performance and damper rate matching.
All are concerned with static looks only. So much for math and the quantitative sciences in the curriculum.
Yes!! Anything over 1.2 in the front will result in negative camber that can't be corrected, so 1.4 vs. 1.2 is dramatic in my opinion and the opinion of my service guy at Infiniti.auditech10 wrote: I mean seriously, if the drop is rated at 1.3 and somebody is adament on having 1.4 or 1.2 do you really think that they wont buy them because of that?
Alright, I’m a little vexed now!!!!auditech10 wrote:Cake,In all reality it doesnt matter if you drop it an inch or a foot, you will eventually have problems. That is why they say "For off road use only" and to use at your own risk.And by the way, with the 1.1 or whatever it was in the front for the Eibachs for you, you ARE changing your camber specs whether you like it or not. Thats what happens when you change the distance between the spring seat to the mounting point on the body. Im not trying to pick a fight, btw.Cheers
"Reality" As in real life? You gotta be joking, right!?! Go lower your car a "foot" and get back to us and I'll keep my car at 1.1 or whatever. We will see if it matters.auditech10 wrote:In all reality it doesn’t matter if you drop it an inch or a foot, you will eventually have problems.
what does this have to do with anything? <--- strictly a rhetorical question on my part, so spare me of an answer on this one.auditech10 wrote:That is why they say "For off road use only" and to use at your own risk.
I’m not debating the fact that camber changes once a car is lowered. It’s common knowledge for most people who lower cars. …and that is why the good ole boys at Infiniti have the proper alignment tools/machines to adjust camber back to spec as long as the car hasn’t been lowered too much.auditech10 wrote:And by the way, with the 1.1 or whatever it was in the front for the Eibachs for you, you ARE changing your camber specs whether you like it or not.
LOL its all good baby!!! That is what forums are all aboutauditech10 wrote:Im not trying to pick a fight, btw.Cheers
But as you stated with your 1.1 inch drop that you already had problems, right??? Thanks for proving my point.CakeDaddy wrote:"Reality" As in real life? You gotta be joking, right!?! Go lower your car a "foot" and get back to us and I'll keep my car at 1.1 or whatever. We will see if it matters.
gjh20 wrote:i've been watching this thread & need to know if i can get springs or not. i work with Butler Tire in ATL & have a customer w/money on hand and is very serious about springs or coilovers. whats up???