Good call. I had the Saturn Ion in mind but the Malibu is an even better example of the auto equivalent of cold oatmeal.

Good call. I had the Saturn Ion in mind but the Malibu is an even better example of the auto equivalent of cold oatmeal.

Dittoz7 wrote:Geo prizm

Jesda wrote:By that I mean:
1. Not cute
2. Note polarizing
3. Not brutally ugly
4. Not pretty
5. No heritage or legacy
6. Not fast or too terribly slow
7. Not crude but not extremely refined either
8. Not terribly unreliable, but nothing that would survive a nuclear holocaust either
9. No real cult following, few detractors

Solid example. Forgotten and left to the past. Loved by almost no one.hatedinthemind wrote:Oldsmobile Achieva
I hated mine. If not for some fond teenage memories, I'd never remember it.OriginalWheelman wrote:

Its actually a lot of fun to drive.Chaotic_Warlord wrote:Why hasn't any put the neon on this list yet, afterall you don't get more uninteresting than that.

LTD yes, but no the the Celebrity and Summit Wagon. Both have followings and the Summit wagon is BAD a**.BoostedFC wrote:80's Chevy Celebrity
80's Ford LTD
Eagle Summit Wagon

Neons are regularly raced, there were a couple of performance variants (SRT4 and ACR), and they've got a big cult community. Totally ineligible.Chaotic_Warlord wrote:Why hasn't any put the neon on this list yet, afterall you don't get more uninteresting than that.
I agree. They're just not built particularly well.Jesda wrote:Its actually a lot of fun to drive.Chaotic_Warlord wrote:Why hasn't any put the neon on this list yet, afterall you don't get more uninteresting than that.
I also agree. Nicely designed car, badly built, but Renault also made a turbo version of the car car which had real ballz.HashiriyaS14 wrote:[
I also strike down the Renault, as a French car in America is uncommon enough (even at the time) so as to make it at least borderline "interesting"
Until you try and back up.Jesda wrote:Its actually a lot of fun to drive.Chaotic_Warlord wrote:Why hasn't any put the neon on this list yet, afterall you don't get more uninteresting than that.

08 Lumina,Corsica/Lumina are great entries. Outstandingly mediocre!



Much better choices this time....Chaotic_Warlord wrote:Since my vote for the Neon was kicked out, here are 2 prime examples of less than interesting...
Ford Tempo/Mercury Topaz
Ford Escort
With the exception to the Escort Cossworth (which we can't get here) the rest of the escort/tracer/contour lineup is less than inspiring, especially when powered by its ball less SOHC 1.9L engine (whopping 94hp from the factory). But the escort is horrible looking, and they aren't unreliable, but they are horrible to work on.
Gotta disagree with you on that one. The Tempo is OBNOXIOUSLY reliable. Mine would always run with a stack of problems. I knew peopel that never changed the oil in them, just added as it burned off etc. It's really hard to kill a tempo.Chaotic_Warlord wrote:Ford Tempo/Mercury Topaz
![]()

i HATE the bubble windows!The 90s Escorts were dependable and with a manual GT, really good fun to drive. They werent quick, but they were tossable. GTs also had 1.8L Miata engines.Chaotic_Warlord wrote:With the exception to the Escort Cossworth (which we can't get here) the rest of the escort/tracer/contour lineup is less than inspiring, especially when powered by its ball less SOHC 1.9L engine (whopping 94hp from the factory). But the escort is horrible looking, and they aren't unreliable, but they are horrible to work on.









