Vtec Power??

General discussion forum about the 240sx, and a great place to introduce yourself to the board!
Altiman94
Posts: 5891
Joined: Sun Jun 22, 2003 12:13 pm
Car: 1989 Nissan 240SX

Post

I've seen honda swaps that the vtec wasnt working properly after the swap due to bad wiring. it is enitirely possible that it isn't working. It's almost like your turbo isnt boosting properly, but not quite. The motor is made to run better with the vtec working properly. wait until he has it running good and race him again adn then you will have no doubts about it anymore


User avatar
extheflow
Posts: 333
Joined: Sun Nov 24, 2002 3:33 am

Post

MarkEmark wrote:30 hp?!? I'd like to see the dyno chart. I'm not calling you a liar, but that's incredibly impressive for a system that acts like an aggressively ground set of cams.

I don't see how VTEC adds 30 hp if essentially all that it is is a really aggressive street-cam. An aggressive street cam for the KA (the stock ones are unbelievably mild) will add about 11 whp.

Does anyone know the specs of the camshafts (duration, lift, etc) of some of those honda engines before and after vtec is engaged?

I for one am not impressed at all by VTEC, and I HATE HATE HATE people who treat VTEC like it's a turbocharger--because it's NOTHING alike. (Actually, i was reading a rice-magazine at barnes and nobel the other day and they were saying how VTEC has reached "legendary" status among tuners for its "near-turbo top-end power." What a load of crap).

My mom has a V6 VTEC accord engine, and when vtec "kicks" in, the only thing I notice is the obnoxious sound--doesn't push you back in your seat at all, really unimpressive and uninspiring.

Anyway--yeah, you won legitimately. Too bad if his VTEC wasn't working, that's his fault.
i'm not making excuses for anyone..he will get smoked regardless on if his vtec is working or not.the specs on the cams i had that gained 30hp in vtec over the off vtec lobes wereInt-248 mid Exh-240 mid at .050"lift.(vtec)Int-206 mid Exh-206 mid at .050lift" (off vtec)it's a pretty dramatic difference.especially when the engine is designed to operate at higher RPMs with those specs.BTW i raced a hatch with a CTR swap tonight and destroyed it by quite a few cars.my swap is pretty much stock on 16psi.so you shouldn't worry.

StrangeLove
Posts: 2502
Joined: Tue Dec 02, 2003 11:35 am
Car: 1995 Nissan 240sx

Post

I had hondas for many reasons! They are ugly, I see about 4,000 civics every day and just as many accords, they are fwd, the people who drive them, and the list goes on and on...

(I don't hate the s2000)

Let us know how the race turns out

User avatar
SrS13
Posts: 249
Joined: Sun May 04, 2003 6:28 pm
Car: 1990 Fastback, 1993 Convertible Coupe

Post

extheflow wrote:i'm not making excuses for anyone..he will get smoked regardless on if his vtec is working or not.the specs on the cams i had that gained 30hp in vtec over the off vtec lobes wereInt-248 mid Exh-240 mid at .050"lift.(vtec)Int-206 mid Exh-206 mid at .050lift" (off vtec)it's a pretty dramatic difference.especially when the engine is designed to operate at higher RPMs with those specs.BTW i raced a hatch with a CTR swap tonight and destroyed it by quite a few cars.my swap is pretty much stock on 16psi.so you shouldn't worry.


16 psi really? on what turbo setup?

InlineSix
Posts: 51
Joined: Sat Jan 24, 2004 1:26 pm
Car: Cars

Post

Fish240 wrote:bsstock ITR's run HIGH 14s, you your saying in a ek body it takes off almost 2 seconds?


Yeah, Ill see if I can find it on honda-tech. My friend wants to do that swap so its about all I hear about.

InlineSix
Posts: 51
Joined: Sat Jan 24, 2004 1:26 pm
Car: Cars

Post

He said 13.5 or quicker, I just called him.

Bbill528
Posts: 412
Joined: Wed Jul 24, 2002 4:46 am
Car: 95 Nissan 240SX

Post

Vtec won't kick in if the engine is cold....

User avatar
Turb0wned
Posts: 1114
Joined: Fri Jul 04, 2003 9:08 pm
Contact:

Post

hes mad cause he lost... thats what alot of them say

stueRPS13
Posts: 4
Joined: Sun Mar 14, 2004 3:10 pm
Car: spinaz yo!

Post

sounds like a pretty good excuse... but if his vtec wasent hitting you should walked him a lot harder... only one way to find out.. roll him agin.

User avatar
extheflow
Posts: 333
Joined: Sun Nov 24, 2002 3:33 am

Post

Bbill528 wrote:Vtec won't kick in if the engine is cold....
engine is warm enough for vtec after about 20 seconds of driving on a cold day.

User avatar
extheflow
Posts: 333
Joined: Sun Nov 24, 2002 3:33 am

Post

SrS13 wrote:16 psi really? on what turbo setup?
S15 swap, big exhaust, FMIC.

MarkEmark
Posts: 1857
Joined: Sun Aug 25, 2002 6:25 pm
Car: fully-built '95 240sx KA-T
Contact:

Post

extheflow wrote:i'm not making excuses for anyone..he will get smoked regardless on if his vtec is working or not.the specs on the cams i had that gained 30hp in vtec over the off vtec lobes wereInt-248 mid Exh-240 mid at .050"lift.(vtec)Int-206 mid Exh-206 mid at .050lift" (off vtec)it's a pretty dramatic difference.especially when the engine is designed to operate at higher RPMs with those specs.BTW i raced a hatch with a CTR swap tonight and destroyed it by quite a few cars.my swap is pretty much stock on 16psi.so you shouldn't worry.


I thought the VTEC lobes would have had higher lift than the non-vtec...so all VTEC honda engines, when VTEC kicks in, just have more duration, not lift v. when VTEC is disengaged?

That is quite a bit of difference in duration though, and the idea behind VTEC is no doubt incredible. I just think it's funny that VTEC was designed to keep low end torque without sacrificing high-end horsepower, but when referring to an n/a 4 cylinder honda engine, (the sub 2 liter ones anyway) the word torque almost never comes up ;)

gyfer
Posts: 395
Joined: Mon Oct 14, 2002 7:30 pm

Post

Agreed.It don't make sense if VTEC don't include higher lift.Depend on which engine, 1.6 SiR Civic can make a up to 30hp different, with or without VTEC, across the rpm range.

Say GSR 1.8 make 180hp ( Type-R is 190 if I am right )a Civic Hatch, which weight around 2200, is making 12.22:1 weight to hp ratio. You need 2800bls S14 that make 230hp to even out the power. Plus, the gearing, transmission, etc etc, I would say you need at least 260hp to take him down. Do you have 260hp ?

Do forget 180hp is from 'pretty'-stock engine number.With the power and weight, I don't see why hatchback couldn't make 13sec.

Altiman94
Posts: 5891
Joined: Sun Jun 22, 2003 12:13 pm
Car: 1989 Nissan 240SX

Post

many, many a honda has run 13 sec 1/4 mile times with b series vtec swaps. They are awesome motors to start tuning from.

User avatar
Nameless EJ6
Posts: 1228
Joined: Sun May 11, 2003 9:24 pm
Car: What the **** do you think.

Post

extheflow wrote:engine is warm enough for vtec after about 20 seconds of driving on a cold day.


No, the engine needs to be at operating temperature. That takes much longer than 20 seconds.

You guys need to stop sitting on your computers calculating whether this guy should have won or not because of his cams or power to weight ratio. This is so retarded.

Go do the research for yourselves about VTEC. It's not a very advanced subject to comprehend. It's not only about LIFT, it's also duration. I see that some people seem to be comparing it to aggressive camshafts. Sure you can compare it, but don't forget that your gearing and weight ratio is also different. Honda's have short powerbands and short gearing, your 240's have more torque and shorter redlines. They are also fully tuned from the factory for VTEC. After swapping aggressive cams into your KA's or NA SR's, you've probably just shat all over your low end power yet made 11whp more on your top end. Please don't compare camshafts unless you take everything else into consideration.

If he was being truthfull about his VTEC not working properly, then he shouldn't have even raced you. With no VTEC engaging, it's not operating like it was designed. The air/fuel mapping will be totally off without it. He should also have a CEL if it's not in operating.

Alot of you guys think that regardless of whether his VTEC is operating or not, that he should have lost either way, you're wrong. Stock GSR swapped hatchbacks can come close to breaking 13's with everything operating properly and a good driver (and decent tires). It's night and day without VTEC. Please don't s*** on Hondas if you've never owned, built, or raced them... it's pointless to argue it over the net.

User avatar
Nameless EJ6
Posts: 1228
Joined: Sun May 11, 2003 9:24 pm
Car: What the **** do you think.

Post

Fish240 wrote:bsstock ITR's run HIGH 14s, you your saying in a ek body it takes off almost 2 seconds?


Here, coming from someone who had a fully swapped 00 JDM ITR in his 99 EJ hatch, you can do the math (you are right btw):

I ran a 14.5 @ 99mph with a 2.4 60 foot. My car weighed 2380 with full interior. I lost traction in every gear except 5th. My transmission also utilized the 4.785 final drive which is mostly the cause of that.

It will definetely break 13's on better tires than I had, but will NEVER break off 12 seconds without more modifications or weight loss. I had I/E and a tuned OBD1 chipped ECU. Everything operating perfectly.

2 seconds is alot to ask from a swap, it won't happen.

However, in the 92-95 hatch, breaking 12's has been done with the same setup I ran and fully gutted interior excluding dash. :D

User avatar
extheflow
Posts: 333
Joined: Sun Nov 24, 2002 3:33 am

Post

Nameless EJ6 wrote:No, the engine needs to be at operating temperature. That takes much longer than 20 seconds.

You guys need to stop sitting on your computers calculating whether this guy should have won or not because of his cams or power to weight ratio. This is so retarded.

Go do the research for yourselves about VTEC. It's not a very advanced subject to comprehend. It's not only about LIFT, it's also duration. I see that some people seem to be comparing it to aggressive camshafts. Sure you can compare it, but don't forget that your gearing and weight ratio is also different. Honda's have short powerbands and short gearing, your 240's have more torque and shorter redlines. They are also fully tuned from the factory for VTEC. After swapping aggressive cams into your KA's or NA SR's, you've probably just shat all over your low end power yet made 11whp more on your top end. Please don't compare camshafts unless you take everything else into consideration.

If he was being truthfull about his VTEC not working properly, then he shouldn't have even raced you. With no VTEC engaging, it's not operating like it was designed. The air/fuel mapping will be totally off without it. He should also have a CEL if it's not in operating.

Alot of you guys think that regardless of whether his VTEC is operating or not, that he should have lost either way, you're wrong. Stock GSR swapped hatchbacks can come close to breaking 13's with everything operating properly and a good driver (and decent tires). It's night and day without VTEC. Please don't s*** on Hondas if you've never owned, built, or raced them... it's pointless to argue it over the net.


i did own one...for over a year. it was my daily driver/beater. and the engine does not have to be up to operating temps for VTEC to engage. it takes about 20seconds. i don't know what the exact parameter is but from my personal experience with the car i owned .as long as it was warm enough to idle at the normal RPM then it was warm enough for vtec.

swappedcrx
Posts: 33
Joined: Sun Mar 09, 2003 8:56 am
Car: building street cars for me and my band of misfits

Post

As a sr20det'ed s13 owner living in a house of turbo charges and all motor imports i can say this and i have dyno charts and timeslips to back-up everyword. My roommate has a 88 civic hatch with an all OEM ls/vtec set-up that runs 13.53 @103.5 on 205-50-15 Azenias and 12.8@101 on 23" MandH slicks. Oem rods pistons,cams intake manifold open header and runnin a pig rich "mugen" chip. On the highway we are a neck and neck race to 115mph(damn limiter) the car weighs in at about 2100 lbs and makes 172.2 hp to the wheels as measures at Car-Tech in Ft. Lauderdale. Point of the story is that its perfectly possible with tuning and bolt-ons that you could get a heck-of a race from a swapped EF or EG as these motors are proven to make 190-210 from a GS-R or a relatively mild LS or CR-Vtec. My car isn't the fastest stock T25 in the world in a matter of fact i can't figure where my top end is at but at my last dyno i put down 225 hp 225 ft/lbs of torque before a couple more upgrades.13.4 & 103 mph for me. If his vtec didn't work who cares he lost. He shoulda stayed home that night but dont try to write off a civic cause now you got a front-mount. Last night a "stock" GSRed EG hatch walked me on a 50 or so shot of nitrous from a 2nd gear roll. Shot out a car and a half and i couldnt pull him in.

User avatar
PROJECTRB240SX
Posts: 3673
Joined: Fri Jun 13, 2003 5:33 pm
Car: 1972 DATSUN 240Z W/ SR20DET

Post

GSR ENGINE IN A HATCH IS GOOD FOR ABOUT LOW 14'SI USED TO BUILD HATCHES IN HAWAII. WE TRIED EVERYTHING AND THE CHEAPEST/FASTEST SETUP WE BUILT WAS THE B20 VTEC HYBRID. IT COST US ABOUT 1200 TO BUILD WITH I/H/E WE WERE UP TO $1850. OUR SETUPS WERE PUTTING 215HP AT THE WHEELS AND PUSHING HATCHES IN THE LOW 13'S.... STRIPPED HATCHES WERE RUNNING LOW 11'S OR EVEN 10'S. THE HATCH THAT RAN A 10 WEIGHED JUST OVER 2000LBS AND THE DRIVER WEIGHED 165LBS.

soon2besr20
Posts: 17
Joined: Mon Mar 15, 2004 9:03 am

Post

thats an excuse if i have ever heard one. Vtec kicks in automatically at i believe either 5800 or 6200 rpm. The gsr has vtec on intake and exhaust side and is gunna be pretty wquick once swapped into the body. The only thing a vtec controller can do is start you into vtec at a lower or higher rpm, so basically you handed it to him and he couldnt take it. Good job:ylsuper !

User avatar
Nameless EJ6
Posts: 1228
Joined: Sun May 11, 2003 9:24 pm
Car: What the **** do you think.

Post

PROJECTRB240SX wrote:GSR ENGINE IN A HATCH IS GOOD FOR ABOUT LOW 14'SI USED TO BUILD HATCHES IN HAWAII. WE TRIED EVERYTHING AND THE CHEAPEST/FASTEST SETUP WE BUILT WAS THE B20 VTEC HYBRID. IT COST US ABOUT 1200 TO BUILD WITH I/H/E WE WERE UP TO $1850. OUR SETUPS WERE PUTTING 215HP AT THE WHEELS AND PUSHING HATCHES IN THE LOW 13'S.... STRIPPED HATCHES WERE RUNNING LOW 11'S OR EVEN 10'S. THE HATCH THAT RAN A 10 WEIGHED JUST OVER 2000LBS AND THE DRIVER WEIGHED 165LBS.


Low 11's or 10's? With 215 whp? That not possible even in a 2000 pound gutted hatch.

User avatar
BoostFab
Posts: 3529
Joined: Wed Dec 03, 2003 8:23 am
Car: S13cp, S13fb, S14z
Location: Nismo Land
Contact:

Post

SrS13 wrote:Just a quick question:

How much of a difference will Honda engine with Vtec be without Vtec. I ask because I raced a Honda Hatchback I believe it was like a 1998 model with a GSR engine. I beat him with my 1990 240 with sr20 T25 turbo bossting 13-14 psi.

I beat him by 3rd gear and was a good lenght ahead Id say maybe 3-4 cars lenght.

with little traction because Im on 15s stock suspension and regular street tires.

He said his Vtec wasnt kicking in. How much of a difference will it be with Vtec kicking in??


first of all, VTEC isn't nitrous--you will not feel "WOW" kick; all VTEC does is engaging a higher lift on the cams ~5.5K RPM.

come'on man, you can't be expecting a NA motor keeping up to a boosted motor, especially you're pushing at 13-14lb/psi.

have that gsr motor boosted 13-14lb/psi and we'll see a different story.

User avatar
PROJECTRB240SX
Posts: 3673
Joined: Fri Jun 13, 2003 5:33 pm
Car: 1972 DATSUN 240Z W/ SR20DET

Post

http://www.turbofast.com.au/Drag.html

HERE TYPE IN THE STATS AND THIS CALCULATOR IS ULTRA CONSERVATIVE. YES IT DID RUN A 10.99 AND I WISH I STILL HAD THE TIMESLIP..... THIS WAS BACK IN 2000.

User avatar
PROJECTRB240SX
Posts: 3673
Joined: Fri Jun 13, 2003 5:33 pm
Car: 1972 DATSUN 240Z W/ SR20DET

Post

I'M SORRY I FORGOT TO SAY WITH I/H/E IT WAS AROUND 230HP AT THE WHEELS. THE B20 VTEC WAS 215 BY ITSELF..... I'M NOT TRYING TO CONVINCE YOU OF ANYTHING BUT ITS BEEN DONE AND THEY DO IT CONTINUOSLY. HELL THERE USED TO BE A HAWAIIAN WEBSITE DEVOTED TO THE B20 VTEC CARS THAT WERE BUILT.

User avatar
SrS13
Posts: 249
Joined: Sun May 04, 2003 6:28 pm
Car: 1990 Fastback, 1993 Convertible Coupe

Post

soon2besr20 wrote:thats an excuse if i have ever heard one. Vtec kicks in automatically at i believe either 5800 or 6200 rpm. The gsr has vtec on intake and exhaust side and is gunna be pretty wquick once swapped into the body. The only thing a vtec controller can do is start you into vtec at a lower or higher rpm, so basically you handed it to him and he couldnt take it. Good job:ylsuper !


yeah he said his vtec controller was not reading rpms and if it not reading rpms then Vtec wont know when to engage correct?

User avatar
PROJECTRB240SX
Posts: 3673
Joined: Fri Jun 13, 2003 5:33 pm
Car: 1972 DATSUN 240Z W/ SR20DET

Post

WRONG THE VTEC HITS AT THE PREDETERMIND MOMENT THE ECU TELLS IT TOO..... THE VTEC CONTROLLER ALTERS THE SIGNAL TO SPEED UP ENGAGEMENT OF VTEC, IF THE AVC IS SETUP WRONG IT COULD STOP THE COMPUTER FROM ENGAGING THE VTEC PROPERLY. MY FRIENDS SI HAD TWO WIRES BACKWARDS AND VTEC WASN'T ENGAGING BECAUSE THE ECU LEAD WAS BEING GROUNDED OUT.

InlineSix
Posts: 51
Joined: Sat Jan 24, 2004 1:26 pm
Car: Cars

Post

when you say B20 vtec. do you mean B20 block with a b16 vtec head?

User avatar
PROJECTRB240SX
Posts: 3673
Joined: Fri Jun 13, 2003 5:33 pm
Car: 1972 DATSUN 240Z W/ SR20DET

Post

NOPE ITS A B20 BLOCK WITH A B18C1 HEAD... ITS THE CRV BLOCK WITH A GSR HEAD.

InlineSix
Posts: 51
Joined: Sat Jan 24, 2004 1:26 pm
Car: Cars

Post

yeah, you can do b16 or b18 head, wasnt sure on your set up. from your experences, what would you recomend. the b20 block setup or the itr engine in a ek hatch. both engines would go into an ek hatch btw

User avatar
PROJECTRB240SX
Posts: 3673
Joined: Fri Jun 13, 2003 5:33 pm
Car: 1972 DATSUN 240Z W/ SR20DET

Post

I know they do.... I would do the b20 as it usually cost less and has about 40 more chp. The itr engine puts down 175ish at the wheels while the b20 vtec hybrids I have built put down 215whp so roughly 240ish chp. Its and easy build and can run off the itr ecu.


Return to “240sx General Discussion”