i'm not making excuses for anyone..he will get smoked regardless on if his vtec is working or not.the specs on the cams i had that gained 30hp in vtec over the off vtec lobes wereInt-248 mid Exh-240 mid at .050"lift.(vtec)Int-206 mid Exh-206 mid at .050lift" (off vtec)it's a pretty dramatic difference.especially when the engine is designed to operate at higher RPMs with those specs.BTW i raced a hatch with a CTR swap tonight and destroyed it by quite a few cars.my swap is pretty much stock on 16psi.so you shouldn't worry.MarkEmark wrote:30 hp?!? I'd like to see the dyno chart. I'm not calling you a liar, but that's incredibly impressive for a system that acts like an aggressively ground set of cams.
I don't see how VTEC adds 30 hp if essentially all that it is is a really aggressive street-cam. An aggressive street cam for the KA (the stock ones are unbelievably mild) will add about 11 whp.
Does anyone know the specs of the camshafts (duration, lift, etc) of some of those honda engines before and after vtec is engaged?
I for one am not impressed at all by VTEC, and I HATE HATE HATE people who treat VTEC like it's a turbocharger--because it's NOTHING alike. (Actually, i was reading a rice-magazine at barnes and nobel the other day and they were saying how VTEC has reached "legendary" status among tuners for its "near-turbo top-end power." What a load of crap).
My mom has a V6 VTEC accord engine, and when vtec "kicks" in, the only thing I notice is the obnoxious sound--doesn't push you back in your seat at all, really unimpressive and uninspiring.
Anyway--yeah, you won legitimately. Too bad if his VTEC wasn't working, that's his fault.
extheflow wrote:i'm not making excuses for anyone..he will get smoked regardless on if his vtec is working or not.the specs on the cams i had that gained 30hp in vtec over the off vtec lobes wereInt-248 mid Exh-240 mid at .050"lift.(vtec)Int-206 mid Exh-206 mid at .050lift" (off vtec)it's a pretty dramatic difference.especially when the engine is designed to operate at higher RPMs with those specs.BTW i raced a hatch with a CTR swap tonight and destroyed it by quite a few cars.my swap is pretty much stock on 16psi.so you shouldn't worry.
extheflow wrote:i'm not making excuses for anyone..he will get smoked regardless on if his vtec is working or not.the specs on the cams i had that gained 30hp in vtec over the off vtec lobes wereInt-248 mid Exh-240 mid at .050"lift.(vtec)Int-206 mid Exh-206 mid at .050lift" (off vtec)it's a pretty dramatic difference.especially when the engine is designed to operate at higher RPMs with those specs.BTW i raced a hatch with a CTR swap tonight and destroyed it by quite a few cars.my swap is pretty much stock on 16psi.so you shouldn't worry.
extheflow wrote:engine is warm enough for vtec after about 20 seconds of driving on a cold day.
Fish240 wrote:bsstock ITR's run HIGH 14s, you your saying in a ek body it takes off almost 2 seconds?
Nameless EJ6 wrote:No, the engine needs to be at operating temperature. That takes much longer than 20 seconds.
You guys need to stop sitting on your computers calculating whether this guy should have won or not because of his cams or power to weight ratio. This is so retarded.
Go do the research for yourselves about VTEC. It's not a very advanced subject to comprehend. It's not only about LIFT, it's also duration. I see that some people seem to be comparing it to aggressive camshafts. Sure you can compare it, but don't forget that your gearing and weight ratio is also different. Honda's have short powerbands and short gearing, your 240's have more torque and shorter redlines. They are also fully tuned from the factory for VTEC. After swapping aggressive cams into your KA's or NA SR's, you've probably just shat all over your low end power yet made 11whp more on your top end. Please don't compare camshafts unless you take everything else into consideration.
If he was being truthfull about his VTEC not working properly, then he shouldn't have even raced you. With no VTEC engaging, it's not operating like it was designed. The air/fuel mapping will be totally off without it. He should also have a CEL if it's not in operating.
Alot of you guys think that regardless of whether his VTEC is operating or not, that he should have lost either way, you're wrong. Stock GSR swapped hatchbacks can come close to breaking 13's with everything operating properly and a good driver (and decent tires). It's night and day without VTEC. Please don't s*** on Hondas if you've never owned, built, or raced them... it's pointless to argue it over the net.
PROJECTRB240SX wrote:GSR ENGINE IN A HATCH IS GOOD FOR ABOUT LOW 14'SI USED TO BUILD HATCHES IN HAWAII. WE TRIED EVERYTHING AND THE CHEAPEST/FASTEST SETUP WE BUILT WAS THE B20 VTEC HYBRID. IT COST US ABOUT 1200 TO BUILD WITH I/H/E WE WERE UP TO $1850. OUR SETUPS WERE PUTTING 215HP AT THE WHEELS AND PUSHING HATCHES IN THE LOW 13'S.... STRIPPED HATCHES WERE RUNNING LOW 11'S OR EVEN 10'S. THE HATCH THAT RAN A 10 WEIGHED JUST OVER 2000LBS AND THE DRIVER WEIGHED 165LBS.
SrS13 wrote:Just a quick question:
How much of a difference will Honda engine with Vtec be without Vtec. I ask because I raced a Honda Hatchback I believe it was like a 1998 model with a GSR engine. I beat him with my 1990 240 with sr20 T25 turbo bossting 13-14 psi.
I beat him by 3rd gear and was a good lenght ahead Id say maybe 3-4 cars lenght.
with little traction because Im on 15s stock suspension and regular street tires.
He said his Vtec wasnt kicking in. How much of a difference will it be with Vtec kicking in??
soon2besr20 wrote:thats an excuse if i have ever heard one. Vtec kicks in automatically at i believe either 5800 or 6200 rpm. The gsr has vtec on intake and exhaust side and is gunna be pretty wquick once swapped into the body. The only thing a vtec controller can do is start you into vtec at a lower or higher rpm, so basically you handed it to him and he couldnt take it. Good job:ylsuper !