blacksrjdm wrote:U want torque then put in an LS1. With that 426hp I had around 300ft-lb of torque and that car like I said was scary fast. I'm not gonna be here all day argueing with you about torque and horsepower. Just to tell you that the SR swap is a direct bolt in engine, and depending on the body car you put it in it is between 8 and 16 wires that need to be spliced. The swap you are talking about has been available since 2000 or 2001. Obviously if there isnt an abundance of 240s swapped to VG33ER's than there may be a reason. I know that those 3.3L s/c engines are not very strong and arent going to handle too much over stock boost. Good luck though.
nevermind this was the older S12svairman wrote:didn't nissan offer a version of the s15 (200sx gt in Australia) with an available v6? (vg30)
yeah i read a little more and saw that thanks, and no need to get defensive. I'm not arguing with you or knocking the SR or your setup, this is just a infomation exchanging thread.BOOST_myantidrug wrote:No, the VG30E (SOHC V6) was used in the S12 generation Nissan Silvia
yeah sorry that bit was ment to be quoted to blacksrjdm, who was getting appearently twisted over something.BOOST_myantidrug wrote:Wait...what?
I was simply giving you information about the question you asked. How was that being defensive?
I personally think the SR is a waste of money, but that is a different discussion for a different thread. The best swap for the money is the LS. With simple bolt-ons a mild tune and a larger cam, you can easily get to the 400whp mark, and do so cheaper than rebuilding a KA, or SR, if you know what you're doing
I guess that i should say too that im not interested in which swaps are easiest or can be bought of shelf or in a kit. This is a project car that I dont intend to be finishing in less than a year, just merely a side hobby to tinker with in spare time. So like I said while the SR and LS are good options they just don't interest me.BOOST_myantidrug wrote:There are swap kits made for the LS into 240 swaps that set the motor as far back as possible. do some research and you'll find em...
Trust me, it may be the newest fanboi trend, but it really is the best bang for the buck swap there is...if you have the money for it
to me projects and cars like this are just toys for bigger boys, the best ones are never practicalBOOST_myantidrug wrote:I just don't think that the VG33R is going to be worth the time and effort in the end, regardless on your time table for finishing it.
you wanna do a cool swap that hasn't been done in a 240, but would be really cool to see...
VK56DE, just as light as the LS, good power, really rare to see as of right now, and would sound like heaven when done
This is all I'm trying to get accross to you OP. I am not getting twisted about any of it. Do as you please. Honestly just trying to get the point accross that the VG33ER may not be the best option for you at this point. though if you are stuck on it then just be prepared for disapointment as BOOST_myantidrug is saying is all.BOOST_myantidrug wrote:There are swap kits made for the LS into 240 swaps that set the motor as far back as possible. do some research and you'll find em...
Trust me, it may be the newest fanboi trend, but it really is the best bang for the buck swap there is...if you have the money for it. With this platform, if the VG33R swap was worth it, it would probably have already been done. That's how you have to look at it. The engine is not sutible for any kind of mods, and the stock supercharger is at it's max already...if you did it, you would be kicking yourself after for not doing something else
Psstsvairman wrote:VK56 swap
http://www.turbo-infiniti.com/...2d53b
i'd like to stay away from having to cut the firewall or tunnel
Nice VK45DE swap
zer...age=1
I'd like to address this nonsense...svairman wrote:Horse power is this and only this: hp= torque * rpm / 5252. Torque is twisting force measured in lbs ft. Torque is what moves your car down the strip and the better the torque curve is the quicker it will be. HP is typically a good way of knowing the approximate potential of an engine and that is why we use it so much. Keep in mind how important the torque curve is cause if you build a 400hp SR and a 400hp VQ/VG all things being equal the VQ/VG is going to be quicker in a drag car because of the extra torque down low to get the car outa the hole.
You only made 300ft/lbs with a 426hp SR, the VG makes only about 50 less with 210hp and it makes all its torque by 2800rpms. Im willing to bet your turbo was barely spooled by then.
Also the the LS swap had crossed my mind by i'd like to know which is lighter the LS or VG
Oh and some more details on the stock VG are a cast iron engine block and aluminum heads. Roller followers and forged steel connecting rods, a one-piece cast camshaft, and a cast aluminum intake manifold.
With all the gm talk i'd considered sourcing a 4.3L from an old syclone or typhone also, having the same block design as the chevy 350 im sure I could adapt a LS conversion kit. These engines used a B-W awd system also hmmmm....svairman wrote:hmm thanks for the imput, maybe I'll stick a Saab B234 in there instead