i dont wan thread jack but i guess im still cool wit u..i wanna ask u a quick question i found someone sellin a 300zx tt wit a rb26 swap on it the engine starts nd all but needs 2 injectors...how expensive wud tht be? the guy wants 7000 for the car as it is btw...simmode1 wrote:Hey, speaking of Craigslist... A stock '94 2+2 with JDM front for $3800... http://austin.craigslist.org/ctd/1489998560.html
So who wants to call them and tell them the rear wheels are on backwards?car nut wrote:Stupid f****** a***hole dealers.
http://philadelphia.craigslist....html
Thread jack? This entire thread is one massive threadjacking.k3vin0615 wrote: i dont wan thread jack but i guess im still cool wit u..i wanna ask u a quick question i found someone sellin a 300zx tt wit a rb26 swap on it the engine starts nd all but needs 2 injectors...how expensive wud tht be? the guy wants 7000 for the car as it is btw...
Its got 180K on it, Its Green, And its 2+2 Autosimmode1 wrote:Hey, speaking of Craigslist... A stock '94 2+2 with JDM front for $3800... http://austin.craigslist.org/ctd/1489998560.html
That 94 NA looks pristine with low milescar nut wrote:Stupid f****** a***hole dealers.
http://philadelphia.craigslist....html
if i where you i'd get a tt front bumper with a nice carbon fiber lip some nice side skirts and thats it, then slam that b**** on some phat a** wheels give it a clean paint job then leave it alone unless you want to tt swap it. but expect to spend about 800 for clean body styling for your z. most of that 8 bills being the front lip.Vanessalalinda wrote:totally off topic here but can someone explain to me what getting a new body kit entail? pricewise? how hard of a job is it? where do i even find new body kits? i dont even know if these are stupid questions but i thought i'd ask
I wasn't talking about that... I was thinking what are the odds that somebody would know enuff about that car to realize that the JDM front exists, go thru the trouble of installing it and then leave the rest of the car bone stock?NissanFairladyZ32 wrote:
Its got 180K on it, Its Green, And its 2+2 Auto
Thats why its so cheap
I swear man the 240 guys gotta love you phanatik, you are the biggest proponent of slamming it on it's nuts I've ever seen and my old room mate drives a GTI that gets stuck on speed-bumps literally.phanatikz32 wrote:
if i where you i'd get a tt front bumper with a nice carbon fiber lip some nice side skirts and thats it, then slam that b**** on some phat a** wheels give it a clean paint job then leave it alone unless you want to tt swap it. but expect to spend about 800 for clean body styling for your z. most of that 8 bills being the front lip.
If it weren't for Phanatik, I wouldn't be here. I've always respected this platform, but it was Phanatik that opened my eyes to some of the visual possibilities. I'm not an advocate of 'extremely slammed' rides... but I hate wheel gap. As long as there's no wheel gap, I'm a happy camper!NolimitZ32 wrote:I swear man the 240 guys gotta love you phanatik, you are the biggest proponent of slamming it on it's nuts I've ever seen and my old room mate drives a GTI that gets stuck on speed-bumps literally.
man, there are a few more of us slamburglers on here. z32tt or whatever his username is is pretty low aswell. storry about being slammed, the other day i was driving through the city and i started hearing this wierd a** noise and i was like wtf is that? i realized that the street was all oddly curved and my car was dragging on the ground. lol mostly my front bumper but i noticed my exhaust resonaters had a few scrapes that werent there before.simmode1 wrote:
If it weren't for Phanatik, I wouldn't be here. I've always respected this platform, but it was Phanatik that opened my eyes to some of the visual possibilities. I'm not an advocate of 'extremely slammed' rides... but I hate wheel gap. As long as there's no wheel gap, I'm a happy camper!
1st of all no matter how low a gti is it will always look like a van lol. 2nd you're right, slammed cars just look so ill to me. theres nothing like riding next to a corvette and you're lower than they are. plus its almost like a right of passage now into the drift community.NolimitZ32 wrote:
I swear man the 240 guys gotta love you phanatik, you are the biggest proponent of slamming it on it's nuts I've ever seen and my old room mate drives a GTI that gets stuck on speed-bumps literally.
it's held on by 3M tape and rivets. a two piece skirt but the top piece are optional.skinZ32 wrote:
how do those side skirts actually atatch to the car?
and on the front wheel in that pic.... does the corner of the side skirt sit lower than the corner of the 99 front bumber
i like these sideskirts too...dont know yet. both are nice!simmode1 wrote:
And some nice subtle side skirts, like these:
in my opinion those side skirts would be dope if they were lower to the ground, i like flat flush skirts but those just look to stockish, i would love skirts like that but maybe 2 inches or more lower than they are.Vanessalalinda wrote: i like these sideskirts too...dont know yet. both are nice!
Wow... That is COMPLETELY opposite from what we recommend to noobs in the S-chassis board. We usually advise ppl to upgrade their suspension and braking performance before adding power, primarily as a safety precaution. I've noticed that this board doesn't seem to subscribe to that school of logic...NolimitZ32 wrote:its that I will spend my money on power, sound, wheel, etc.... before I get too deep into suspension and I like doing things right
z brakes are ok, but i would get fade all the time on the mountain, they are better for lighter cars like the s-chassis.simmode1 wrote:How much power are you planning for and do you track your car?
These are the questions we have to ask 240 drivers. It doesn't take much to overwhelm our stock brakes and we have alot of guys tracking their cars. There are even some that had to upgrade from Z32 brakes after experiencing fade at the track.
At the least, I'd consider performance pads, slotted rotors and braided lines if you do any 'spirited' driving...
except that neg. camber is necessary for optimum performance.... but i've come to terms with the fact that i'm a ricer, i dont care that my car handles like s*** as low as it is, i just love being low. also i've yet to ding my oil pan and i've been slammed for a while now. also i wouldnt really consider sound over suspension for function over form.NolimitZ32 wrote: its always function over form... any amount of camber is a a neg in my book because I want the car to perform at the top of its ability and then I'll worry bout how it looks.
I think thats a realization more ppl need to come to. Everybody has this goal in mind of building some uber badass car that's capable of laying some rediculous Time Attack smack down. When in reality, most ppl will NEVER put that performance to use on a track or even rarely on a mountain road. Sometimes, ppl set goals soooo lofty, they never even reach them.phanatikz32 wrote:but i've come to terms with the fact that i'm a ricer, i dont care that my car handles like s*** as low as it is, i just love being low. also i've yet to ding my oil pan and i've been slammed for a while now. also i wouldnt really consider sound over suspension for function over form.