wow jaja performance machine uh?i love it when my friends ask me about the speedo after 5 minutes of thingking about it, of couse they only see the numbersDjPantsSpecR wrote:i know, my buddy was looking at a Volkswagon something or other, adn the sales woman said
"look at the speedometer, it goes to 160, that should tell you what a performance machine this is"
we left
You can doubt it all you want... but its true. I have done a couple of pulls with him from about 90, and that thing hauls ***. I have seen him hit 140, and it was no problem.zippitta wrote: I am sorry but I am going to have to throw the BS flag on the Jetta doing 160.
The aerodynamics of bikes are HORRIFICALLY bad compared to cars produced past like 1965. For example, a bike with a REALLY good Cd (A hayabusa) has a .561Cd, whereas a stock 240 has like a .32 or something.zippitta wrote: I am sorry but I am going to have to throw the BS flag on the Jetta doing 160. There has only been a few street vehicles that I have ridden in past 140... and one was my bike...RIP... it was a zx-6R and put down about 120 hp to the ground. (close to what a stock 240 has) That thing would stop pulling at 160...you want to tell me that a stock 240 with more than twice the drag is going to make it to 160....HE!! no. The other vehicles were highly moddified cars 500hp+.
i get that all the time but I am pretty sure our gauge cluster is far from perfect.Florida240sx wrote:Pardon the dirty dash.
It does not list gear or governed limit; which, tells me that it is drag limited. And when it comes to top speed, weight isnt really a factor, horsepower and aerodynamics is what it is all about.naed240sx wrote:Where did that stat come from, and is it a drag limited, computer limited or gear limited top speed? The 05 is a POS anyways that weighs a ton. That is only 14 mph away. Going slightly downhill could have helped as well.
Haha nice. I hope you were not the one taking that picture. that is what my speedo looks like when I top my car out. It read high before, and now it reads even higher because of the 4.4 diff.Florida240sx wrote:Pardon the dirty dash.
They run mid-high 15's stock if you can drive. That's faster than 90% of the cars on the road, really. You have a skewed perception of what slow is. Go drive a metro and you will understand the true meaning of slow.cyrus240sx wrote: dont get me wrong... i love my car, but without an engine swap or a turbo, 240sx's are SLOW!
no its not that i have a skewed perception, its just that what a 240sx is, which i consider is a sports car, it is damn slow, considering pretty much every other sports car will beat it hands down...InsanityInc wrote:
They run mid-high 15's stock if you can drive. That's faster than 90% of the cars on the road, really. You have a skewed perception of what slow is. Go drive a metro and you will understand the true meaning of slow.
150mph? any accurate record of this? is it stock motor with stock gear ratio?kansas240 wrote:if a naturally aspirated flathead can push 150 almost, surely a ka-t can do it with a little aero work. If you can put on a turbo kit, you can dodge a ball.