I was driving my company car, 08 Prius, and there was G35 coupe in front of me driving like a maniac, going zig zag. We were going onto a freeway, and on ramp, I was right behind him, he was about to lose control, but he couldn't shake me until straight line. Does that mean Prius corners better than G35 coupe? Or one time, I was driving downhill in my wife's Honda Pilot, and this AE86 Corolla coupe(looked like he was imitating Initial D) started to tailgate me. I took off, and two minutes later, he was about two corners behind me. Does that mean Pilot corners better? In Jacko's theory, yes, it does. In my theory, no it does not.ACoupe wrote:
From what I can remember, the Dodge Shelby Charger from the mid-late 80's, though a POS, had incredible handling.My father had one and man, that thing could CORNER!It also had the biggest POS transmission on earth...
No, Jacko. You got my reply all wrong. The guy was going zig zag when I saw him. When I started to get behind him, we were going onto freeway, on ramp. 15 MHP 360 corner, going 50MPH+. I was driving a company Prius.Jacko3 wrote:Minmey15:
You got my theory all wrong. I would never have made such a claim as you stated. Zig zagging is dangerous for any car and it is not the true test of cornering.
When i talk about cornering, I am talking about sustained speeds at tight turns on windy and twisty roads. Unfortunately, I cannot even begin to explain to you, the level and degree of turns and twist that exist on a lonely 2 - 4 mile road near where I live. Each twist requires braking clutchiing and handling without stop. Any mistake in handling can cause the car to understeer and loose control.
My little Nissan does quite well in the twisties on this road becasue it is light. However, beyond a certain speed input, it becomes uncontrollable, and thus, one has to wait for the car to reduce in speed before any other maneuvers are made. It is in this instance that the G-35 outshines many cars---stability under really dangerous and unpredictable conditions.
And you are not understanding what I am saying at all. You always say that 350Z and G35 cope are the ultimate handling machine, however, I disagree.Jacko3 wrote:Minmey15:
Sentientbydesign fully understands the situation I described.
Yeah, I think Jacko misunderstood my post too. The weight of the G35 coupe makes it unmaneuverable (sp) at times. The car would need a significant weight loss and stiffer suspension to be a "superior handling" vehicle IMO.Minmey15 wrote:
And you are not understanding what I am saying at all. You always say that 350Z and G35 cope are the ultimate handling machine, however, I disagree.
Sentientbydesign even said that it is not the best handling car. So what are you exactly saying? And you never answered my question. Is this your first car? Have you driven other cars? If you have driven a Civic with good suspension downhill, you would never say that your V35 coupe would outhandle it.
And please understand that I love my V36. I think it is the best car! But that doesn't mean that it is the best handling or the fastest car. It just happens to be the car I like the most.
It does better going up though. But downhill, brake tends to fade. When you consider its weight, I think it does an excellent job! But it is not made for twisty.Sentientbydesign wrote:
Yeah, I think Jacko misunderstood my post too. The weight of the G35 coupe makes it unmaneuverable (sp) at times. The car would need a significant weight loss and stiffer suspension to be a "superior handling" vehicle IMO.
My wife complains about the "lines" I take in order to keep the G35 feeling safe around corners (I have to appease her when she's a passenger). She always says, "My Celica can take this...I can take it much faster..."
I'm seriously thinking about Dealership hopping soon. There are quite a few cars I'd like to drive just to get a feel for and compare to the G35.Minmey15 wrote:
It does better going up though. But downhill, brake tends to fade. When you consider its weight, I think it does an excellent job! But it is not made for twisty.
Celica can be nimble, and quite fast downhill. But it is FWD. FWD does not allow us to drift through corners. I sometimes go to my secret place, and go 70 MPH, and pull e-brake! No other feeling like it!
BTW, my idea of ultimate handling machine is... FC, FD, GT-R, Evo, STI, Integra and Civic Type and etc. I had Evo 9 and traded in with V36 sedan, never looked back!
Wait, that's US$13,000 ? You'd pay that much for a pile of tin and plastic that resembles a prolapsed rectum more than a car, and sounds like an excerpt from a beastiality vid played backwards while accelerating?etschell wrote:the srt-4 is faster than a g by far. it is the sickest speed for your buck car out IMO. seriously you can get one for 13k on ebay with miles.
Are you telling me you can drive 4200lbs car almost as fast as Evo or STI? Maybe you are talking about VERY SHORT none. And you need to remember the length of the course has alot to do with the subject you brought up.NSR A32 wrote:Two seconds? That's a large margin in auto-X. My 4200lb family car keeps a closer margin than that.
well the fc's and and 240s were ruining about 9 sec slower so thts pretty impressive to meNSR A32 wrote:Two seconds? That's a large margin in auto-X. My 4200lb family car keeps a closer margin than that.
So you're telling me that my 4200lbs car will go slower down a hill than a car that weighs 1000lbs less than that? I think someone was asleep in science class.Minmey15 wrote:
Are you telling me you can drive 4200lbs car almost as fast as Evo or STI? Maybe you are talking about VERY SHORT none. And you need to remember the length of the course has alot to do with the subject you brought up.
I would be very surprised to see someone race 4200lbs car against Civic type R downhill and keep up with it.
Don't get me wrong. I would never buy Civic or Integra, however, those cars do corner very well.
When I say downhill, I mean twisty downhill. And I might've been asleep in my science class, but I wouldn't say your 4200lbs car is faster than Civic.NSR A32 wrote:
So you're telling me that my 4200lbs car will go slower down a hill than a car that weighs 1000lbs less than that? I think someone was asleep in science class.
And I have been talking about corneting. And I don't know what kind of car you have, so I could not make a judgement. I just think 4200lbs is way too heavy to be competing with a light sports. But if you say it's faster, I am sure it is. Gravity tends to make a heavy car straight, but maybe your car is more nimble.NSR A32 wrote:I wasn't responding to the thread. I was responding to you.
Also, I'd be willing to bet that my car IS faster in the twisties than a Civic. I'd also bet that my car can out accelerate a Civic.
On another note, by the time the Civic gets to the top of the next hill, my car would be in another state. All about torque.
And the story would have been different if I was racing YOU off road in my Pathfinder. I love it when people have to go to another aspect of a race that never occurred to compensate. I have out cornered my friend's 240SX in my wife's 2.5 Altima at 90mph on sweeper interstate ramps. Just because said SRT-4 isnt oriented for cornering doesnt factor in the most important aspect of the race. The driver.Jacko3 wrote:Remember, this is a straightline movement, which the G-35 Coupe was bound to loose. The story would have been different on curves and tight turns.
Well said!!!!Cold_Zero wrote:
And the story would have been different if I was racing YOU off road in my Pathfinder. I love it when people have to go to another aspect of a race that never occurred to compensate. I have out cornered my friend's 240SX in my wife's 2.5 Altima at 90mph on sweeper interstate ramps. Just because said SRT-4 isnt oriented for cornering doesnt factor in the most important aspect of the race. The driver.
Are you referring to your 4th gen? If so, that thing does NOT weigh 4200lbs. Try 3200. Probably around 3500 with you and any accessories.NSR A32 wrote:
So you're telling me that my 4200lbs car will go slower down a hill than a car that weighs 1000lbs less than that? I think someone was asleep in science class.
What are you doing here? lolMettler wrote:Wait, that's US$13,000 ? You'd pay that much for a pile of tin and plastic that resembles a prolapsed rectum more than a car, and sounds like an excerpt from a beastiality vid played backwards while accelerating?
You have exceptionally poor taste... in fact I'd probably go so far as to say you literally have no taste in cars, and do not qualify to post your invalid ramblings about anything.
This whole thread is just