USA Today wrote:The money will come from the more than $1 billion the Treasury Department set aside to pay for disposal of Old GM assets.
Come to the dark side - we have cookies.AZhitman wrote: I don't like Ford's vehicles, but I hope they sell a metric crap-ton of them and put GM / Chrysler out of their misery.
Thanks, Captain Obvious. I didn't miss that, it's irrelevant.IBCoupe wrote:Psst... Greg, it was already paid for.USA Today wrote:The money will come from the more than $1 billion the Treasury Department set aside to pay for disposal of Old GM assets.
I see what you tried (in vain) to do there.heliochrome85 wrote:How is that vette of yours Greg?
I don't believe GM will be receiving any capital in this scenario. Looks like the funds will be distributed to State governments that harbored GM production facilities. GM won't be involved in cleanup, aside from consultancy I assume. Motors Liquidation Co. will have more to do with it.AZhitman wrote:The money being already earmarked doesn't make it right.
Where's my billion dollars for sucking at a business venture?
No, but removal of a financial responsibility / liability is the same. Would I rather have $1200 a month handed to me for the next 22 years, or someone pay off my mortgage? Same deal.mattblancarte wrote: I don't believe GM will be receiving any capital in this scenario. Looks like the funds will be distributed to State governments that harbored GM production facilities.
Exactly.mattblancarte wrote:Totally lame that GM just left $3/4 billion of waste for taxpayers to clean up, though. Largest cleanup fund in history? Fail fail fail.
Wrong. They've not seen a red cent of mine.IBCoupe wrote:Did you debadge your Corvette, Greg? Replace the body panels? You're contributing to GM every time you take that car cover off.
Nope. In fact, if the costs of GM’s cleanup efforts top $1.1 billion, the rest will come from taxpayers.IBCoupe wrote:And it's not irrelevant. As far as anyone can tell, GM is done bleeding us dry. This is money we already bled. You're misrepresenting facts. This was accounted for and publicized at the time that we bailed out GM
That people see your Nissans doesn't preclude them from seeing and envying your Corvette.AZhitman wrote:Wrong. They've not seen a red cent of mine.IBCoupe wrote:Did you debadge your Corvette, Greg? Replace the body panels? You're contributing to GM every time you take that car cover off.
Perhaps you've taken the tack that since I drive it, others who wish to emulate me will also want to drive one.
In that case, I think my 8:1 ratio of Nissan:GM speaks much more loudly.
AZhitman wrote:Nope. In fact, if the costs of GM’s cleanup efforts top $1.1 billion, the rest will come from taxpayers.
unless you are in SOCAL...IBCoupe wrote: Honestly, I bet there are more people jealous of the Chevy than the Cube.
Just because parts of the sky have already fallen doesn't mean I have to accept it (or cease being pissed about it).IBCoupe wrote:AZhitman wrote:Nope. In fact, if the costs of GM’s cleanup efforts top $1.1 billion, the rest will come from taxpayers.
And when we get there, then this thread will be warranted. 'Til then, Chicken Little, shut yer beak!
Eh.heliochrome85 wrote:i dont blame you greg. they have alot of fat to cut. and no, they havent cleared the weeds just yet, but its tough to not be in awe of their turn around. their latest products are pretty damn amazing.
Agreed, and you're technically right.IBCoupe wrote:Certainly, Greg, you can object to the original bailout, but the premise of this thread looks to be that we're entering "new bailout" country, which just isn't the case. Maybe it will be in the future, but it isn't now.
QFT. The fully-equipped CTS is hands-down my favorite luxury sedan for daily driving. Super reliable, super comfy, sexy as hell.heliochrome85 wrote:i dont blame you greg. they have alot of fat to cut. and no, they havent cleared the weeds just yet, but its tough to not be in awe of their turn around. their latest products are pretty damn amazing.
Topical with a side order of suck.heliochrome85 wrote:http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/2010/1 ... t-opposer/
i dont usally link to TTAC, because they are the tea-party of the automotive world,but lo and behold, there is a reasonbly topical article today.
BTW, the Camaro is bloated and passe already, and is shedding its resale value like a prom dress.article comments wrote:Your whole tone, “only a latte per person” and “less than 2 c-notes each” was offensive. It is my money and I resent it being wasted on the single worst managed company ever and to a union that feels entitled to everything while giving nothing in return.
Yep. My folks own one, and I'd love to have a CTS-V wagon or coupe.mattblancarte wrote: QFT. The fully-equipped CTS is hands-down my favorite luxury sedan for daily driving. Super reliable, super comfy, sexy as hell.
mattblancarte wrote:QFT. The fully-equipped CTS is hands-down my favorite luxury sedan for daily driving. Super reliable, super comfy, sexy as hell.heliochrome85 wrote:i dont blame you greg. they have alot of fat to cut. and no, they havent cleared the weeds just yet, but its tough to not be in awe of their turn around. their latest products are pretty damn amazing.
I'm not sure if they have plans to or not, but I would like to see GM participate in the funding.
I absolutely love the 'synergy green' color. I really want to see it on an S30. Maybe that's just me.heliochrome85 wrote:as for the camaro, i haventt seen that level of excitement about a GM product in years
you drive an AC. you'd know about ugly butts.IBCoupe wrote:I looked at the CTS-V Coupe as being what I'd buy after law school... but that's one ugly butt.