It's easy to carry a state ID. Which I'm sure will be more then good enough. Immigration is a serious problem and it needs to be dealt with. This is no different then the things we now endure when boarding a plane.szhosain wrote:
Is that what we are heading towards? Absurd!
Z
That...and the whole loss of cheap labor could have a disastrous effect on this already repressed economy.WDRacing wrote:In order to stop the influx of illegal immigrants you need to enforce the boarders and make life suck for them once they're already here. That's just fact. There is no "kids gloves" manner to attack this problem. Why do you think Obama is doing ZERO here? Because it's a loser of a battle and he doesn't want his name attached to it.
WD
My point is that the California driving license is, in effect, a "State ID". But, supposedly the AZ police cannot accept other state's driving licenses as adequate "proof" under this law. That is absurd!WDRacing wrote:It's easy to carry a state ID. Which I'm sure will be more then good enough. Immigration is a serious problem and it needs to be dealt with. This is no different then the things we now endure when boarding a plane.szhosain wrote:Is that what we are heading towards? Absurd!
Z
The ends justify the means by 100%. Without the ability to ask questions the authorities have no authority...how the hell are we supposed to fix something when we can't ask the required questions?
Is it really so awful to carry an ID? I mean lets stop making a mountain out of mole hill here guys. If you're legal you'll have an ID.
Those points I can agree with.WDRacing wrote:Lets all stop with the coddling here...illegal immigrants have had free reign in this country since it's inception. It HAS to stop some time and some how. Implementing some red tape crap isn't going to do a damn thing either. Going after people that hire illegals isn't going to stop them from coming into the country, sounds good on paper, sucks in practice.
In order to stop the influx of illegal immigrants you need to enforce the boarders and make life suck for them once they're already here. That's just fact. There is no "kids gloves" manner to attack this problem. Why do you think Obama is doing ZERO here? Because it's a loser of a battle and he doesn't want his name attached to it.
Not a problem!WDRacing wrote:I didn't mean to undercut your point Z.
Exactly the concern! The claim is that they cannot quickly verify the legitimacy of any out-of-state license ... if this is true, the law enforcement officer will have darn tough time knowing what to do for out-of-state drivers they happen to pull over.WDRacing wrote:Are you sure that an out of state license can't be used? If so I don't see how they can possibly expect an already under staffed police force to handle any issues that arise on the individual levels.
You don't have to be on any special list, you just need to be able to type a few words and click "search"...if that's to much for yousrellim234 wrote:As of last night when I posted golf was not on the agenda. Apparently they worked it in.
Tha said, I want to thank you for keeping us informed with your inside information. I didn't know you were on the "need to know" list at the White House and kept informed of every phone call, message to Congress or even every conversation the President has with every representative and Senator he shares a golf cart with.
The fact is, you have no knowledge hard he is or is not working on the issue.
srellim234 wrote:He inherited an ugly economy. That was his #1 priority. He succeeded in screwing it up even worse. Priority #2: screw up health reform. Mission accomplished. Now he's revisiting the economy under the guise of preventing it from happening again and is in the process of butchering Wall Street rules and regulations.
Possibly he figures there's a better chance of getting immigration reform passed after the Republicans pick up some seats in the midterm elections. The minority party always does.
It takes time to ruin so many major pieces of legislation covering such a wide range of issues. Give him a little more time. He'll get there.
Did I say that? No...srellim234 wrote:Really? A search engine tells you what he talked about on the phone and in private discussions in a golf cart? Which search engine is that?
Would it be gay of me to say I love you?srellim234 wrote:He inherited an ugly economy. That was his #1 priority. He succeeded in screwing it up even worse. Priority #2: screw up health reform. Mission accomplished. Now he's revisiting the economy under the guise of preventing it from happening again and is in the process of butchering Wall Street rules and regulations.
Possibly he figures there's a better chance of getting immigration reform passed after the Republicans pick up some seats in the midterm elections. The minority party always does.
It takes time to ruin so many major pieces of legislation covering such a wide range of issues. Give him a little more time. He'll get there.
What la la land are you living in? The recession is actually forcing illegals to go back to their home country. Mainly because of the glut of labor in this country (from high unemployment rates) and the suspension spending (of personal, local and state projects.) Also if people are cutting back on their spending the first things to go are non essential services like landscaping and house cleaning...ScorchedNX2K wrote:That...and the whole loss of cheap labor could have a disastrous effect on this already repressed economy.
Wait, you think that the people who come here illegally to work actually pay taxes? Not only do they not pay taxes, but they drain the local/state infrastructures, steal people's identities to do so (which is a felony) and send the bulk of their money over the border where it is not re-invested in your local economy. How the hell would this pull our country out of the recession?Or...it could pull us out of the recession by increasing the amount of taxable people in the country and lowering the unemployment rate (Less people, more jobs, and the immigrants who secure the right to stay will contribute equally). But I tend to be a skeptic.